| Date |
Text |
| 2021-07-26 12:53:03 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) THE PROPOSED DOOR INSTALL IS WITHIN AN ASSEMBLY |
| | OCCUPANCY. |
| | |
| | THERE ARE NO INDICATIONS OF THE REQUIRED EXIT DOOR |
| | HARDWARE INDICATED IN THE CODE BELOW. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 13, EXISTING OCCUPUCANCIES. |
| | |
| | 13.2.2.2.3 ANY DOOR IN A REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS FROM |
| | AN AREA HAVING |
| | AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 100 OR MORE PERSONS SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED TO BE PROVIDED |
| | WITH A LATCH OR LOCK ONLY IF THE LATCH OR LOCK IS PANIC |
| | HARDWARE OR |
| | FIRE EXIT HARDWARE COMPLYING WITH 7.2.1.7, UNLESS |
| | OTHERWISE PERMITTED |
| | BY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: |
| | (1) THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL NOT APPLY TO DELAYED-EGRESS |
| | ELECTRICAL LOCKING |
| | SYSTEMS AS PERMITTED IN 13.2.2.2.5. |
| | (2) THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL NOT APPLY TO SENSOR-RELEASE |
| | OF ELECTRICAL |
| | LOCKING SYSTEMS AS PERMITTED IN 13.2.2.2.6. |
| | 13.2.2.2.4 LOCKING DEVICES COMPLYING WITH 7.2.1.5.5 |
| | SHALL BE PERMITTED |
| | TO BE USED ON A SINGLE DOOR OR A SINGLE PAIR OF DOORS |
| | IF BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING |
| | CONDITIONS APPLY: |
| | (1) THE DOOR OR PAIR OF DOORS SERVE AS THE MAIN EXIT |
| | FROM ASSEMBLY |
| | OCCUPANCIES HAVING AN OCCUPANT LOAD NOT GREATER THAN |
| | 600. |
| | (2) ANY LATCHING DEVICES ON SUCH A DOOR(S) FROM AN |
| | ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY |
| | HAVING AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 100 OR MORE ARE RELEASED BY |
| | PANIC HARDWARE OR FIRE EXIT HARDWARE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE FOR THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
