| Date |
Text |
| 2021-07-09 13:09:13 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) THERE ARE NO INDICATIONS OF SMOKE ALARMS. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101 |
| | |
| | 17.6.3.4.1 SMOKE ALARMS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN |
| | DAY-CARE HOMES IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH 9.6.2.10. |
| | |
| | AS A NEW LARGER OCCUPANCY, THE SA SHALL BE |
| | INTERCONNETED SO THAT |
| | WHEN ONE GOES OFF TEHY ALL GO OFF. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 72 |
| | |
| | 29.5.1.1* WHERE REQUIRED BY OTHER GOVERNING LAWS, |
| | CODES, OR STANDARDS FOR A SPECIFIC TYPE OF |
| | OCCUPANCY, APPROVED SINGLE- AND MULTIPLE-STATION SMOKE |
| | ALARMS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS FOLLOWS: |
| | (1)* IN ALL SLEEPING ROOMS AND GUEST ROOMS |
| | (2)* OUTSIDE OF EACH SEPARATE DWELLING UNIT SLEEPING |
| | AREA, WITHIN 21 FT (6.4 M) OF ANY DOOR |
| | TO A SLEEPING ROOM, WITH THE DISTANCE MEASURED ALONG A |
| | PATH OF TRAVEL |
| | (3) ON EVERY LEVEL OF A DWELLING UNIT, INCLUDING |
| | BASEMENTS |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE SA LOCATIONS AND DETAILS OF BEING |
| | INTERCONNECTED. FYI THEY DO NOT NEED TO BE HARD WIRED, |
| | THEY MAKE BLUETOOTH SA THAT ARE BATTERY POWERED. |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) WITH THE PROPOSED INCREASE IN CLIENTS, THE OCCUPANCY |
| | IS CLASSIFIED AS A GROUP DAY CARE HOME. |
| | |
| | 17.6.1.4.1 SUBCLASSIFICATION OF DAY-CARE HOMES. |
| | SUBCLASSIFICATION |
| | OF DAY-CARE HOMES SHALL COMPLY WITH 17.6.1.4.1.1 AND |
| | 17.6.1.4.1.2. |
| | |
| | 17.6.1.4.1.1 FAMILY DAY-CARE HOME. A FAMILY DAY-CARE |
| | HOME SHALL |
| | BE A DAY-CARE HOME IN WHICH MORE THAN THREE, BUT FEWER |
| | THAN SEVEN, |
| | CLIENTS RECEIVE CARE, MAINTENANCE, AND SUPERVISION BY |
| | OTHER THAN THEIR |
| | RELATIVE(S) OR LEGAL GUARDIAN(S) FOR LESS THAN 24 HOURS |
| | PER DAY, GENERALLY |
| | WITHIN A DWELLING UNIT. |
| | 17.6.1.4.1.2 GROUP DAY-CARE HOME. A GROUP DAY-CARE HOME |
| | SHALL |
| | BE A DAY-CARE HOME IN WHICH NOT LESS THAN 7, BUT NOT |
| | MORE THAN 12, |
| | CLIENTS RECEIVE CARE, MAINTENANCE, AND SUPERVISION BY |
| | OTHER THAN THEIR |
| | RELATIVE(S) OR LEGAL GUARDIAN(S) FOR LESS THAN 24 HOURS |
| | PER DAY, GENERALLY |
| | WITHIN A DWELLING UNIT. |
| | |
| | 17.6.1.7 OCCUPANT LOAD. |
| | |
| | 17.6.1.7.2 IN GROUP DAY-CARE HOMES, ALL OF THE |
| | FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY: |
| | (1) THE MINIMUM STAFF-TO-CLIENT RATIO SHALL BE NOT LESS |
| | THAN TWO STAFF |
| | FOR UP TO 12 CLIENTS. |
| | (2) THERE SHALL BE NOT MORE THAN 3 CLIENTS INCAPABLE OF |
| | SELF-PRESERVATION. |
| | (3) THE STAFF-TO-CLIENT RATIO SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE |
| | MODIFIED BY THE |
| | AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION WHERE SAFEGUARDS IN |
| | ADDITION TO THOSE |
| | SPECIFIED BY SECTION 17.6 ARE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | IT IS THE INTENT OF THIS CODE TO CLASSIFY CHILDREN |
| | UNDER THE AGE OF 30 MONTHS |
| | AS INCAPABLE OF SELF-PRESERVATION. EXAMPLES OF DIRECT |
| | INTERVENTION BY |
| | STAFF MEMBERS INCLUDE CARRYING A CLIENT, PUSHING A |
| | CLIENT OUTSIDE IN A |
| | WHEELCHAIR, AND GUIDING A CLIENT BY DIRECT HAND-HOLDING |
| | OR CONTINUED |
| | BODILY CONTACT. IF CLIENTS CANNOT EXIT THE BUILDING BY |
| | THEMSELVES WITH |
| | MINIMAL INTERVENTION FROM STAFF MEMBERS, SUCH AS VERBAL |
| | ORDERS, CLASSIFICATION |
| | AS INCAPABLE OF SELF-PRESERVATION SHOULD BE CONSIDERED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE NUMBER AND AGE OF CLIENTS |
| | AND WITH THE STAFF TO CLIENT RATIO THAT COMPLY WITH THE |
| | CODE |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
