| Date |
Text |
| 2022-12-29 17:35:59 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) FOURTH BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #21070135. |
| | |
| | PROVISO: NOTE: |
| | BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| | MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER |
| | THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES APPLY (EXCEPT FOR |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS DEFERRED SUBMITTAL). |
| | |
| | ***IMPORTANT****CONTRACTOR TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION |
| | IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME OR IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED |
| | INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | ***IMPORTANT*** |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE CERTIFIED AT THE BOTTOM |
| | OF FORM BY THE OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT BEFORE ISSUING |
| | THE PERMIT. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1- THIS BUILDING IS GOING TO BE BUILT IN A AE FLOOD. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | A)FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A2.0 AND FOUNDATION PLAN ON SHEET |
| | S1 DON'T SPECIFY THE PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION. |
| | PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION. SEC. 107.3.5.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SHEET A2.0 SPECIFIES PROPOSED FINISH ELEVATION OF THE |
| | MAIN HOUSE BUT IS NOT SPECIFYING THE FINISHED FLOOR |
| | ELEVATION OF THE GARAGE. SAME COMMENT APPLIES FOR |
| | FOUNDATION PLAN. |
| | NOTE: REVISED DRAWING A2.0 WAS NO UPLOADED TO |
| | PROJECTDOX. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | B)UNABLE TO OPEN DRAWING A2.0 ON PROJECTDOX. IT LOOKS |
| | LIKE THE DRAWING IS TOO BIG. REDUCE DRAWING SIZE FOR |
| | PROPER PLAN REVIEW PROCESSING AND STORAGE. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: THESE APPLIES TO ALL DRAWINGS. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISED DRAWING A2.0 WAS NO UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | C)REVISE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE SUBMITTED (SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS): |
| | (4)SPECIFY EQUIPMENT PROPOSED ELEVATION. |
| | PROPOSED ELEVATION IS INCORRECT. PLANS SHOW EQUIPMENT |
| | IN GARAGE. ALSO, SURVEYOR NEEDS TO DESCRIBE TYPE OF |
| | EQUIPMENT AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE ELEVATION |
| | CERTIFICATE ITEM C2(E). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | EQUIPMENT LOCATED IN THE GARAGE IS NOT DESCRIBED. ALSO, |
| | THERE IS NOT INFORMATION FOR A/C PROPOSED ELEVATION |
| | (INSIDE AND OUTSIDE UNIT). |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | 2- LOT DRAINAGE. |
| | D)RETAINING WALL AND PROPOSED FENCES REQUIRED SEPARATE |
| | PERMITS. SEC. 105.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | COMPLIED. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH FENCE PERMIT |
| | 22120482. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | 7- SHOW ON PLANS CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS BY ALL THE |
| | BEDROOMS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R315.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | PARTIALLY DONE. REVISED DRAWING E1 DOESN'T SHOW A |
| | CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE MASTER |
| | BEDROOM. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISED DRAWING E-1 WAS NOT UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX. |
| | |
| | 11-SHEET A5.0: |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | B)REVISED EXTERIOR DOOR BUCK DETAIL DOESN'T SHOW FULL |
| | SUPPORT OF THE DOOR FRAME. SIZE OF STRUCTURAL BUCK IS |
| | NOT SPECIFIED. THERE ARE ONLY SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | BLOCKING PIECE. ALSO, COORDINATE WITH DOOR PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FOR TYPE OF DOOR FRAME TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | DOOR BUCK DETAIL WAS REVISED BUT TYPICAL WINDOW DETAIL |
| | WAS REVISED AS WELL. NOW WINDOW DETAIL SHOWS A BEVELED |
| | BUCK. BEVELED BUCKS ARE NO LONGER ALLOWED. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. R609.7.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL |
| | |
| | |
| | 15- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | NOTE: ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE NOT REVISED AND |
| | RESUBMITTED. SAME COMMENTS APPLY. SEE BELOW: |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | A)ENERGY CALCULATIONS FORM IS REQUIRED TO BE CERTIFIED |
| | AT THE BOTTOM OF THE FORM BY THE OWNER, THE OWNER'S |
| | ARCHITECT OR OTHER AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNED BY |
| | THE OWNER PRIOR TO RECEIVE THE PERMIT AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | B)PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING OWNER NAME, BUILDER NAME, PERMIT OFFICE AND |
| | JURISDICTION NUMBER (THIS JURISDICTION IS 604700). SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | F)REVISE THE BUILDING ORIENTATION SPECIFIED FOR WALLS, |
| | DOORS AND WINDOWS. THE ENTRY DOOR FOR THIS HOUSE IS |
| | FACING SOUTH NOT NORTH. SEE NORTH ARROW ON PLANS AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | G) REVISE DOOR INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 4. IT LOOKS |
| | LIKE THE GARAGE OVERHEAD DOOR 11'X8' WAS INCLUDED. ONLY |
| | THE DOORS SEPARATING A/C AREAS FROM NON A/C AREAS ARE |
| | TO BE CONSIDERED. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | 16- PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC 61G20-3.001 |
| | FOR: |
| | (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW |
| | PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL): |
| | |
| | A)ROOFING COVER MATERIAL (NOTE: COORDINATE WITH PLANS. |
| | ELEVATIONS CALL FOR CONCRETE TILE, SECTIONS ON SHEET |
| | A4.0 CALL METAL ROOFING PANELS, WALL SECTIONS CALL FOR |
| | SHINGLES UNDER A ROOF TILE NOTE???. REVISE/CLARIFY ALL |
| | PLANS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | B)ROOF UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | C)SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. |
| | D)OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR (SEE SIZE ON PLANS) |
| | E)SLIDING GLASS DOORS. |
| | F)ENTRY DOOR. |
| | G)FLOOD VENTS (COORDINATE WITH ITEM #18 BELOW) |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | TO AVOID MORE CONFUSION/DEALS PLEASE SUBMIT ALL THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS AS A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL AFTER THE |
| | PERMIT ISSUED AS MENTIONED ON ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE |
| | LETTER. COORDINATE ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS WITH DESIGNER |
| | OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | 17- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ARCHITECT'S LETTER STATING THAT HE APPROVES ALL THE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVALS AND NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE |
| | SUBMITTED IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. THERE IS NO WAY OF KNOWING |
| | WHICH PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE REVIEWED/APPROVED. |
| | WHEN PROVIDING A LETTER FOR PRODUCT APPROVAL REVIEW, |
| | THE ARCHITECT NEEDS TO CLEARLY IDENTIFY EACH SPECIFIC |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER AND MODEL. |
| | A PREFER ALTERNATIVE IS FOR ARCHITECT TO STAMP A REVIEW |
| | STAMP OR TO WRITE ON EACH PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE |
| | REVIEWED/APPROVED. THIS WAY IT WILL EXPEDITE THE REVIEW |
| | PROCESS. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS BASED ON PLANS SUBMITTED: |
| | |
| | 18- FOUNDATION PLAN: |
| | A) FOUNDATION PLAN IS MISSING THE 6" DROP ON THE SLAB |
| | AS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A2.0. |
| | |
| | B)FOUNDATION FINISH FLOOR IS BELOW THE 2 FEET FINISH |
| | FLOOR ELEVATION REQUIRED BY CITY ORDINANCE (SEC. 18-284 |
| | CITY ORDINANCE NO. 4729-17). NEED TO SPECIFY FLOOD |
| | VENTS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R322.2.2 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 19- PLANS NEED TO SPECIFY THE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION OF |
| | THE OUTSIDE A/C UNIT. SEC. R322.1.6 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 20- FINISH ROOFING IS NOT CLEAR. ELEVATIONS CALL FOR |
| | CONCRETE TILE, SECTIONS ON SHEET A4.0 CALL METAL |
| | ROOFING PANELS, WALL SECTIONS CALL FOR SHINGLES UNDER A |
| | ROOF TILE NOTE???. REVISE/CLARIFY ALL PLANS AS REQUIRED |
| | TO MATCH. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #16 ABOVE. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 21- REVISE BEDROOM EGRESS WINDOWS SIZE. SINGLE HUNG |
| | WINDOWS DON'T SEEM TO COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM CLEAR |
| | OPENING REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R310.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | TYPICALLY, 60" HEIGHT WINDOW DOESN???T PROVIDE THE 24" |
| | CLEARLY HEIGHT OPENING. REVISE WINDOW SIZE AS REQUIRED |
| | OR PROVIDE MANUFACTURER???S SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 22- SIZE OF GARAGE OVERHEAD DOOR IS NOT PROVIDED NOW. |
| | PROVIDE INFORMATION: SIZE AND DESIGN PRESSURES. SEC. |
| | R301.2.1 FBC=RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
