| Date |
Text |
| 2022-07-12 13:35:44 | NFIP PEER REVIEW |
| | |
| | CHRISTOPHER S. THROOP, C.B.O., CFM |
| | PLANS EXAMINER II PX3169/SFP306 |
| | INSPECTOR BN4338 |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL BU1635 |
| | ASFPM CERTIFIED FLOODPLAIN MANAGER US-21-11935 |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | (561) 805-6726 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | CONSTRUCTION DRAWING ELEVATION CERTIFICATE |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1. LINE A1 OWNERS NAME APPEARS TO BE RICARDO RODRIGUEZ. |
| | PER WARRANTY DEED SUBMITTE4D FOR REVIEW, THE OWNER'S |
| | NAME SHOULD BE "HG 1041 LAKEWOOD LLC" |
| | (SEE ALSO-PERMIT APPLICATION) |
| | PROVIDE CLARIFICATION (CONTRACT FOR SALE/WARRANTY |
| | DEED/OTHER), THAT RICARDO RODRIGUEZ IS THE OWNER? |
| | |
| | 2. LINE C2(F) IS MISSING DATA. |
| | |
| | 3. LINE C2(G) IS MISSING DATA |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| 2022-07-11 13:10:06 | NFIP REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1- THIS BUILDING IS GOING TO BE BUILT IN A AE FLOOD. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | A)FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A2.0 AND FOUNDATION PLAN ON SHEET |
| | S1 DON'T SPECIFY THE PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION. |
| | PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION. SEC. 107.3.5.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PARTIALLY ADDRESSED. SHEET A2.0 SPECIFIES PROPOSED |
| | FINISHEDD ELEVATION OF THE MAIN HOUSE BUT IS NOT |
| | SPECIFYING THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION OF THE GARAGE. |
| | ALSO, FOUNDATION PLAN ON SHEET S1 DOESN'T SPECIFY THE |
| | FINISHE FLOOR ELEVATION AT THE MAIN HOUSE AND THE |
| | GARAGE. PROVIDE INFORMATION AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | B)UNABLE TO OPEN DRAWING A2.0 ON PROJECTDOX. IT LOOKS |
| | LIKE THE DRAWING IS TOO BIG. REDUCE DRAWING SIZE FOR |
| | PROPER PLAN REVIEW PROCESSING AND STORAGE. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: THESE APPLIES TO ALL DRAWINGS. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THESE APPLIES TO ALL DRAWINGS. STILL UNABLE TO OPEN |
| | DRAWINGS. THEY HAVE TOO MUCH INFORMATION. BACKGROUND |
| | LAYERS AND ISOMETRIC DRAWINGS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR |
| | PERMITTING PURPOSES. PLEASE DELETE UNNECESSARY |
| | INFORMATION. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | C)REVISE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE SUBMITTED (SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS): |
| | (1) OK. |
| | (2)OK. |
| | (3)OK. |
| | |
| | (4)SPECIFY EQUIPMENT PROPOSED ELEVATION. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PROPOSED ELEVATION IS INCORRECT. PLANS SHOW EQUIPMENT |
| | IN GARAGE. ALSO, SURVEYOR NEEDS TO DESCRIBE TYPE OF |
| | EQUIPMENT AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE ELEVATION |
| | CERTIFICATE ITEM C2(E). |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT DATES WHEN THE SURVEYOR SIGNED |
| | AND SEALED THE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE. SIGNATURE DATE |
| | SHOULD BE THE DATE IT WAS SIGNED BY THE SURVEYOR. THESE |
| | ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WAS REVISED. ONLY THE DATE OF THE |
| | DIGITAL SIGNATURE SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
