| Date |
Text |
| 2022-07-11 15:27:59 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) THIRD BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #21070135 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | IMPORTANT: REPEAT COMMENT, NOT ADDRESSED: |
| | PLEASE UPLOAD A SMALLER FILE FOR SHEETS A1.0, A2.0. |
| | THESE DRAWINGS ARE TOO LARGE AND WE CANNOT PROPERLY |
| | OPEN AND MARK THEM WHEN PERMIT IS READY FOR ISSUANCE. |
| | NOTE: THEY HAVE TOO MUCH INFORMATION. BACKGROUND LAYERS |
| | AND ISOMETRIC DRAWINGS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR PERMITTING |
| | PURPOSES. PLEASE DELETE UNNECESSARY INFORMATION. THESE |
| | APPLIES TO ALL DRAWINGS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1- THIS BUILDING IS GOING TO BE BUILT IN A AE FLOOD. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | A)FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A2.0 AND FOUNDATION PLAN ON SHEET |
| | S1 DON'T SPECIFY THE PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION. |
| | PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION. SEC. 107.3.5.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PARTIALLY ADDRESSED. SHEET A2.0 SPECIFIES PROPOSED |
| | FINISHED ELEVATION OF THE MAIN HOUSE BUT IS NOT |
| | SPECIFYING THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION OF THE GARAGE. |
| | ALSO, FOUNDATION PLAN ON SHEET S1 DOESN'T SPECIFY THE |
| | FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION AT THE MAIN HOUSE AND THE |
| | GARAGE. PROVIDE INFORMATION AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | B)UNABLE TO OPEN DRAWING A2.0 ON PROJECTDOX. IT LOOKS |
| | LIKE THE DRAWING IS TOO BIG. REDUCE DRAWING SIZE FOR |
| | PROPER PLAN REVIEW PROCESSING AND STORAGE. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: THESE APPLIES TO ALL DRAWINGS. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THESE APPLIES TO ALL DRAWINGS. STILL UNABLE TO OPEN |
| | DRAWINGS. THEY HAVE TOO MUCH INFORMATION. BACKGROUND |
| | LAYERS AND ISOMETRIC DRAWINGS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR |
| | PERMITTING PURPOSES. PLEASE DELETE UNNECESSARY |
| | INFORMATION. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | C)REVISE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE SUBMITTED (SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS): |
| | (1) OK. |
| | (2)OK. |
| | (3)OK. |
| | |
| | (4)SPECIFY EQUIPMENT PROPOSED ELEVATION. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PROPOSED ELEVATION IS INCORRECT. PLANS SHOW EQUIPMENT |
| | IN GARAGE. ALSO, SURVEYOR NEEDS TO DESCRIBE TYPE OF |
| | EQUIPMENT AND LOCATION AS REQUIRED BY THE ELEVATION |
| | CERTIFICATE ITEM C2(E). |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT DATES WHEN THE SURVEYOR SIGNED |
| | AND SEALED THE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE. SIGNATURE DATE |
| | SHOULD BE THE DATE IT WAS SIGNED BY THE SURVEYOR. THESE |
| | ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WAS REVISED. ONLY THE DATE OF THE |
| | DIGITAL SIGNATURE SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- LOT DRAINAGE. |
| | A)OK. |
| | B)OK. |
| | C)OK. |
| | |
| | D)RETAINING WALL AND PROPOSED FENCES REQUIRED SEPARATE |
| | PERMITS. SEC. 105.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 3- OK. |
| | 4- OK. |
| | 5- OK. |
| | 6- OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 7- SHOW ON PLANS CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS BY ALL THE |
| | BEDROOMS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R315.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PARTIALLY DONE. REVISED DRAWING E1 DOESN'T SHOW A |
| | CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE MASTER |
| | BEDROOM. |
| | |
| | 8- OK. |
| | 9- OK. |
| | |
| | 10- STRUCTURAL PLANS: |
| | A)OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B)STRUCTURAL PLANS TO SPECIFY ROOF TRUSSES DEAD AND |
| | LIVE LOADS. CLEARLY SPECIFY TOP AND BOTTOM LOADS. |
| | INCLUDING THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD AS REQUIRED BY TABLE |
| | R301.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEE FOOTNOTES "B" AND "G". |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. CLEARLY SPECIFY TOP |
| | CHORD LIVE AND DEAD LOADS AND BOTTOM CHORD LIVE AND |
| | DEAD LOADS. NOTE: SEE FOOTNOTES "B" AND "G" OF TABLE |
| | R301.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C)STRUCTURAL PLANS SHOW A VENTED ATTIC. COORDINATE WITH |
| | REVISED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. IT IS NOT CLEAR IF ATTIC |
| | IS DESIGNED AS VENTED OR UNVENTED. SEE COMMENT BELOW. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ARCHITECT NEEDS TO SPECIFY LOCATION OF THE VENTS |
| | SPECIFIED ON TYPICAL WALL SECTION 1/A5.0. SHOW VENT |
| | LOCATIONS ON THE ROOF PLAN. |
| | |
| | 11-SHEET A5.0: |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A)IT IS NOT CLEAR IF BUILDING IS DESIGNED WITH A VENTED |
| | OR UNVENTED ATTIC. TYPICAL WALL SECTION SHOWS AN |
| | UNVENTED ATTIC, WHILE THE SECTION AT BOND BEAM DETAIL |
| | ABOVE THE WALL SECTION SHOWS A VENTED ATTIC. |
| | REVISE/CLARIFY AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: IF VENTED, THEN SPECIFY VENT SIZE AND SPACING. |
| | IF UNVENTED, THEN PROVIDE ICC EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE |
| | FOAM R-30 INSULATION SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT TO |
| | VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R316 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE REPORT IN |
| | WRITING PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ARCHITECT NEEDS TO SPECIFY LOCATION OF THE VENTS |
| | SPECIFIED ON TYPICAL WALL SECTION 1/A5.0. SHOW VENT |
| | LOCATIONS ON THE ROOF PLAN. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B)EXTERIOR DOOR BUCK DETAIL SPECIFIES 1X4 OR 2X4 P.T. |
| | BUCK. THIS SIZE OF BUCK DOESN'T PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO |
| | THE DOOR FRAME AS REQUIRED. BY SEC. R609.7.2.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISED DETAIL DOESN'T SHOW FULL SUPPORT OF THE DOOR |
| | FRAME. SIZE OF STRUCTURAL BUCK IS NOT SPECIFIED. THERE |
| | ARE ONLY SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE BLOCKING PIECE. ALSO, |
| | COORDINATE WITH DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR TYPE OF DOOR |
| | FRAME TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | 12- OK. |
| | 13- OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 14- REVISE THE CODE REFERENCE PROVISION SPECIFIED ON |
| | SHEET A0.0. THIS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IS R3 NOT R2. |
| | SEC. 310.5 FBC-BUILDING. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 15- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | A)ENERGY CALCULATIONS FORM IS REQUIRED TO BE CERTIFIED |
| | AT THE BOTTOM OF THE FORM BY THE OWNER, THE OWNER'S |
| | ARCHITECT OR OTHER AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNED BY |
| | THE OWNER PRIOR TO RECEIVE THE PERMIT AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS COMMENT: |
| | B)PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING OWNER NAME, BUILDER NAME, PERMIT OFFICE AND |
| | JURISDICTION NUMBER (THIS JURISDICTION IS 604700). SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | C)OK. |
| | D)OK. |
| | E) OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | F)REVISE THE BUILDING ORIENTATION SPECIFIED FOR WALLS, |
| | DOORS AND WINDOWS. THE ENTRY DOOR FOR THIS HOUSE IS |
| | FACING SOUTH NOT NORTH. SEE NORTH ARROW ON PLANS AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | G) REVISE DOOR INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 4. IT LOOKS |
| | LIKE THE GARAGE OVERHEAD DOOR 11'X8' WAS INCLUDED. ONLY |
| | THE DOORS SEPARATING A/C AREAS FROM NON A/C AREAS ARE |
| | TO BE CONSIDERED. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 16- PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC 61G20-3.001 |
| | FOR: |
| | (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR REVIEW |
| | PRIOR TO INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL): |
| | |
| | A)ROOF SHINGLES. |
| | B)ROOF UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | C)SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS AS SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OF |
| | RECORD. |
| | NOTE: PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS FOR HORIZONTAL |
| | SLIDING WINDOWS NOT FOR SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 17- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: THIS APPLIES ALSO TO PRODUCT APPROVALS ALREADY |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 18- OK. |
| | |
| | 19- INFORMATIONAL: |
| | SIDEWALK NOTES ON SHEET A1.0 NEED TO BE COORDINATED |
| | WITH THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. SIDEWALK IS NOT |
| | INCLUDED IN THIS PERMIT. SEPARATE PERMIT IS REQUIRED. |
| | COORDINATE NOTES WITH THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. |
| | SEC. 105.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
