| Date |
Text |
| 2021-12-21 09:49:16 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #21070135 |
| | |
| | IMPORTANT: REPEAT COMMENT, NOT ADDRESSED: |
| | PLEASE UPLOAD A SMALLER FILE FOR SHEETS A1.0, A2.0. |
| | THESE DRAWINGS ARE TOO LARGE AND WE CAN NOT PROPERLY |
| | OPEN AND MARK THEM WHEN PERMIT IS READY FOR ISSUANCE. |
| | THEY HAVE TOO MUCH INFORMATION. MAYBE BY DELETING THE |
| | BACKGROUND LAYERS WILL HELP. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- THIS BUILDING IS GOING TO BE BUILT IN A AE FLOOD |
| | ZONE WITH THE BASE FLOOD BFE: 12.2 FEET BASED ON NAVD |
| | 1988. |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ORDINANCE REQUIRES A TWO (2) |
| | FOOT FREE BOARD ABOVE THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION (SEC. |
| | 18-284 CITY ORDINANCE NO. 4729-17). NEED TO SPECIFY THE |
| | PROPOSED FINISHED ELEVATION IN ALL FLOOR PLANS. |
| | DURING THE PERMITTING OF THIS STRUCTURE THREE DIFFERENT |
| | FLOOD ELEVATION CERTIFICATES WILL BE REQUIRED (SEC. |
| | 107.3.5.1.1 CITY AMENDMENTS): |
| | A) CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. |
| | B) BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION. |
| | C) FINISHED CONSTRUCTION. |
| | NOTE: |
| | NEED TO PROVIDE THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS ELEVATION |
| | CERTIFICATE NOW FOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | A)FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET A2.0 AND FOUNDATION PLAN ON SHEET |
| | S1 DON'T SPECIFY THE PROPOSED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION. |
| | PROVIDE THE REQUIRED INFORMATION. SEC. 107.3.5.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B)UNABLE TO OPEN DRAWING A2.0 ON PROJECTDOX. IT LOOKS |
| | LIKE THE DRAWING IS TOO BIG. REDUCE DRAWING SIZE FOR |
| | PROPER PLAN REVIEW PROCESSING AND STORAGE. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO DRAWING A1.0 ALSO. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | C)REVISE ELEVATION CERTIFICATE SUBMITTED (SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS): |
| | (1) GARAGE INFORMATION IS INCORRECT. THIS BUILDING HAS |
| | AN ATTACHED GARAGE. |
| | (2)THE VERTICAL DATUM SPECIFIED ON ITEM C2 DOESN'T |
| | MATCH VERTICAL DATUM USED FOR THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION |
| | (BFE), |
| | (3)SPECIFY GARAGE SLAB PROPOSED ELEVATION. |
| | (4)SPECIFY EQUIPMENT PROPOSED ELEVATION. |
| | |
| | D)REVISE THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE THE |
| | TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET A5.0. |
| | COORDINATE WITH PLANS AND ELEVATION CERTIFICATE TO |
| | AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- LOT DRAINAGE. |
| | PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE FINISHED FLOOR |
| | ELEVATION REQUIRED BY COMMENT #1 ABOVE, WHEN PREPARING |
| | THE DRAINAGE PLAN. PROVIDE PLAN SHOWING THE EXISTING |
| | AND PROPOSED GRADES. SHOW GRADES ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES |
| | TO VERIFY THEY DON'T GET AFFECTED BY-THE NEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISE RETAINING WALL DETAIL ON SHEET A1.2: |
| | A)CLARIFY FOOTING DEPTH (5'-01/64" MIN?) AND FOOTING |
| | DEPTH BELOW GRADE (3'-4" MIN?). SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALL |
| | PROPOSED SWALES. SPECIFY ALL DIMENSIONS. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | C)IT LOOKS LIKE THE DRAIN WEEP HOLE IS DIRECTED TO THE |
| | NEIGHBOR'S PROPERTY. THIS IS NOT ALLOWED. SEC. 107.2.5 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | D)RETAINING WALL AND PROPOSED FENCES REQUIRED SEPARATE |
| | PERMITS. SEC. 105.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | NOTE: A DRAINAGE CERTIFICATION WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE INSPECTOR FOR FINAL INSPECTION |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 3- OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 4- ENTRY DOOR DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE MIN. CLEAR WIDTH |
| | OF 32" AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R311.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 5- BEDROOM EGRESS WINDOWS W1 AND W3 DON'T COMPLY WITH |
| | SEC. R310.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | WINDOW SCHEDULE SPECIFY 5'-0" HIGH SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. |
| | TYPICALLY, 5-0" HIGH SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS DON'T PROVIDE |
| | THE 24" CLEAR OPENING HEIGHT. REVISE AS REQUIRED OR |
| | PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S CUT SHEETS SHOWING THAT |
| | SPECIFIED WINDOW SIZE PROVIDES 24" CLEAR OPENING AND |
| | MIN. REQUIRED TOTAL CLEAR OPENING. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 6- NEED BATHROOM WITH MAXIMUM POSSIBLE PRIVACY AND A |
| | DOOR THAT PROVIDES 29" MIN. CLEAR OPENING AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. R320 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 7- SHOW ON PLANS CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS BY ALL THE |
| | BEDROOMS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R315.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 8- OK. |
| | 9- OK. |
| | |
| | 10- STRUCTURAL PLANS: |
| | A)OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B)STRUCTURAL PLANS TO SPECIFY ROOF TRUSSES DEAD AND |
| | LIVE LOADS. CLEARLY SPECIFY TOP AND BOTTOM LOADS. |
| | INCLUDING THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD AS REQUIRED BY TABLE |
| | R301.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEE FOOTNOTES "B" AND "G". |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C)STRUCTURAL PLANS SHOW A VENTED ATTIC. COORDINATE WITH |
| | REVISED ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. IT IS NOT CLEAR IF ATTIC |
| | IS DESIGNED AS VENTED OR UNVENTED. SEE COMMENT BELOW. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | STILL NOT CLEAR IF THE ATTIC IS DESIGNED AS VENTED OR |
| | UNVENTED. ENGINEER'S PLANS SHOW VENTED ATTIC WHILE |
| | ARCHITECT'S PLANS SHOW UNVENTED ATTIC. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH TO AVOID MORE CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | COORDINATE WITH ITEM #10(A)BELOW REGARDING ATTIC |
| | VENTILATION. |
| | (NOTE: THERE WAS A TYPO ON MY PREVIOUS CHECKLIST. I |
| | REPEATED NUMBER 10 TWICE BY MISTAKE. I APOLOGIZE). |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 10-SHEET A5.0: |
| | A)IT IS NOT CLEAR IF BUILDING IS DESIGNED WITH A VENTED |
| | OR UNVENTED ATTIC. TYPICAL WALL SECTION SHOWS AN |
| | UNVENTED ATTIC, WHILE THE SECTION AT BOND BEAM DETAIL |
| | ABOVE THE WALL SECTION SHOWS A VENTED ATTIC. |
| | REVISE/CLARIFY AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: IF VENTED, THEN SPECIFY VENT SIZE AND SPACING. |
| | IF UNVENTED, THEN PROVIDE PROVIDE ICC EVALUATION REPORT |
| | FOR THE FOAM R-30 INSULATION SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT |
| | TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R316 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE REPORT IN |
| | WRITING PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SEE ITEM #10(C) ABOVE. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B)EXTERIOR DOOR BUCK DETAIL SPECIFIES 1X4 OR 2X4 P.T. |
| | BUCK. THIS SIZE OF BUCK DOESN'T PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO |
| | THE DOOR FRAME AS REQUIRED. BY SEC. R609.7.2.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C)TYPICAL WINDOW DETAIL SHOWS BEVELED BUCK. BEVELED |
| | BUCKS ARE NOT ALLOWED. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. |
| | R609.7.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 11- OK. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 12- PARTITIONS ON FLOOR PLAN AND WALL LEGEND SHOWN ON |
| | SHEET A2.0 NEED TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE SHEAR WALLS |
| | SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER ON SHEET S1. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SHEARWALL CONSTRUCTION STILL NOT CLEAR. ENGINEER SHOWS |
| | WOOD STUDS, WHILE ARCHITECT SHOWS METAL STUDS. |
| | COORDINATE AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE COMPLETE SHEARWALL |
| | DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS.SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 13- REVISE THE CODE REFERENCE PROVISION SPECIFIED ON |
| | SHEET A0.0. THIS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IS R3 NOT R2. |
| | SEC. 310.5 FBC-BUILDING. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 14- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. ENERGY CALCULATIONS COMMENTS |
| | WERE NOT ADDRESSED: |
| | |
| | A)ENERGY CALCULATIONS FORM IS REQUIRED TO BE CERTIFIED |
| | AT THE BOTTOM OF THE FORM BY THE OWNER, THE OWNER'S |
| | ARCHITECT OR OTHER AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNED BY |
| | THE OWNER PRIOR TO RECEIVE THE PERMIT AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | B)PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING OWNER NAME, BUILDER NAME, PERMIT OFFICE AND |
| | JURISDICTION NUMBER (THIS JURISDICTION IS 604700). SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | C)A/C AREA SHOWN ON ITEM #6 DOESN'T MATCH A/C AREA |
| | SHOWN ON PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | D)ITEM #11 WILL NEED TO BE COORDINATED WITH REVISED |
| | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. SEE ITEM #10(A) ABOVE. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | E)REVISE THE ATTIC VENT RATIO ON PAGE 2 OF 4. |
| | TYPICALLY, THE RATIO IS 1/150 NOT 1/300. SEC. R806.2 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. OR PERSON PREPARING THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS |
| | SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE 1/300 RATIO AS REQUIRED BY |
| | THE EXCEPTION ON SEC. R806.2. NOTE: ARCHITECT OF RECORD |
| | NEEDS TO REVIEW/APPROVE THEM PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | F)REVISE THE BUILDING ORIENTATION SPECIFIED FOR WALLS, |
| | DOORS AND WINDOWS. THE ENTRY DOOR FOR THIS HOUSE IS |
| | FACING SOUTH NOT NORTH. SEE NORTH ARROW ON PLANS AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | G) REVISE DOOR INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 4. IT LOOKS |
| | LIKE THE GARAGE OVERHEAD DOOR 11'X8' WAS INCLUDED. ONLY |
| | THE DOORS SEPARATING A/C AREAS FROM NON A/C AREAS ARE |
| | TO BE CONSIDERED. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | H) BUILDER TO SIGN AND COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE |
| | LEVEL (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC- ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. ENERGY CALCULATIONS COMMENTS |
| | WERE NOT ADDRESSED: |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 15- PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC 61G20-3.001 |
| | FOR: |
| | A)ROOF SHINGLES. |
| | B)ROOF UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 16- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL L PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: THIS APPLIES ALSO TO PRODUCT APPROVALS ALREADY |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 17- OK. |
| | |
| | 18- SIDEWALK NOTES ON SHEET A1.0 NEED TO BE COORDINATED |
| | WITH THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. SIDEWALK IS NOT |
| | INCLUDED IN THIS PERMIT. SEPARATE PERMIT IS REQUIRED. |
| | COORDINATE NOTES WITH THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. |
| | SEC. 105.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT |
| | NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT |
| | DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE |
| | TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION |
| | SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, |
| | INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, |
| | STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, |
| | VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS |
| | SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF |
| | THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO |
| | CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH |
| | TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED |
| | FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT |
| | OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS |
| | REVIEW |
| | |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
