| Date |
Text |
| 2022-05-20 09:27:23 | SIGNATURE REVIEW FAILED |
| | 1) PLAN LABELED E1.0.1 WITH TITLE BLOCKS OF MCVEGH & |
| | MAN GUM ENGINEERS AND KEITH SPINA ACHITECT HAVE TITLE |
| | BLOCKS WITH NO DIGITAL SIGNATURE |
| | 2) REPORT LABLED STRUCTURAL REVIEW LETTER HAS A SEAL |
| | AND DIGITAL SIGNATURE BY CHELSEA MARAJH ENGINEER WITH A |
| | DIGITAL SIGNATURE THAT IS CORRUPTED AND CANNOT BE |
| | CERTIFIED |
| | |
| | PLEASE FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS OUTLINED BELOW TO CORRECT |
| | THIS ISSUE. |
| | |
| | FS471/FS481 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT OR |
| | ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE |
| | SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS OR DIGITALLY SEALED AND |
| | SIGNED. |
| | |
| | EITHER UPLOAD A DIGITALLY OR ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED PLAN |
| | TO THE SIGNATURE FOLDER WITH YOUR RESUBMITTAL (IF |
| | APPLICABLE) AND COMPLETE THE UPLOAD TASK IN PROJECTDOX, |
| | OR YOU CAN SUBMIT ONE ORIGINAL SIGNED AND SEALED PAPER |
| | ORIGINAL WITH A WET SIGNATURE TO THE BUILDING |
| | DEPARTMENT. |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RESUBMITTAL FORM. |
| | |
| | SIGNATURE DOCUMENTS ARE TYPICALLY REVIEWED WITHIN TWO |
| | BUSINESS DAYS AFTER SUBMITTAL; DIGITALLY SIGNED |
| | DOCUMENTS ARE PREFERRED. |
| | PLEASE EMAIL [email protected] AND CC TO |
| | [email protected] WITH ANY QUESTIONS |
| | |
| | MICHAEL PETERSON |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6746 |
| | |
