| Date |
Text |
| 2021-07-22 13:06:26 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1) THERE ARE INDICATIONS OF NEW TILE, HOWEVER, NO |
| | SPECIFICATIONS SHEETS FOR THE FLOOR UNDERLAYMENT NOR |
| | PROPSED TILE THAT INDICATE MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS PER |
| | NFPA |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CH 30 |
| | |
| | 30.3.3.3 INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH. |
| | 30.3.3.3.1 INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH SHALL COMPLY WITH |
| | SECTION 10.2. |
| | |
| | 30.3.3.3.3 INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH SHALL COMPLY WITH |
| | 10.2.7.1 OR |
| | 10.2.7.2, AS APPLICABLE |
| | |
| | 10.2.1.1 CLASSIFICATION OF INTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS |
| | SHALL BE IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH TESTS MADE UNDER CONDITIONS SIMULATING |
| | ACTUAL |
| | INSTALLATIONS, PROVIDED THAT THE AUTHORITY HAVING |
| | JURISDICTION IS |
| | PERMITTED TO ESTABLISH THE CLASSIFICATION OF ANY |
| | MATERIAL FOR WHICH |
| | CLASSIFICATION BY A STANDARD TEST IS NOT AVAILABLE, |
| | UNLESS OTHERWISE |
| | PROVIDED IN 10.2.1.2 OR 10.2.1.4. |
| | 10.2.1.2 THE PROVISIONS OF 10.2.1.1 SHALL NOT APPLY TO |
| | MATERIALS HAVING |
| | A TOTAL THICKNESS OF LESS THAN 1?28 IN. (0.9 MM) THAT |
| | ARE APPLIED DIRECTLY |
| | TO THE SURFACE OF WALLS AND CEILINGS WHERE BOTH OF THE |
| | FOLLOWING |
| | CONDITIONS ARE MET: |
| | (1) THE WALL OR CEILING SURFACE IS A NONCOMBUSTIBLE OR |
| | LIMITED COMBUSTIBLE |
| | MATERIAL. |
| | (2) THE MATERIALS APPLIED MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | CLASS A INTERIOR |
| | WALL OR CEILING FINISH WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | 10.2.3, |
| | USING FIBER CEMENT BOARD AS THE SUBSTRATE MATERIAL. |
| | |
| | 10.2.7* INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH TESTING AND |
| | CLASSIFICATION. |
| | 10.2.7.1* CARPET AND CARPET LIKE INTERIOR FLOOR |
| | FINISHES SHALL |
| | COMPLY WITH ASTM D 2859, STANDARD TEST METHOD FOR |
| | IGNITION |
| | CHARACTERISTICS OF FINISHED TEXTILE FLOOR COVERING |
| | MATERIALS. |
| | 10.2.7.2* FLOOR COVERINGS, OTHER THAN CARPET FOR WHICH |
| | 10.2.2.2 |
| | ESTABLISHES REQUIREMENTS FOR FIRE PERFORMANCE, SHALL |
| | HAVE A |
| | MINIMUM CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX OF 0.1 W/CM2. |
| | |
| | 10.2.7.4 INTERIOR FLOOR FINISHES SHALL BE GROUPED IN |
| | THE CLASSES SPECIFIED |
| | IN 10.2.7.4.1 AND 10.2.7.4.2 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE |
| | CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX |
| | REQUIREMENTS. |
| | 10.2.7.4.1 CLASS I INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH. CLASS I |
| | INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH |
| | SHALL HAVE A CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX OF NOT LESS THAN |
| | 0.45 W/CM2, AS DETERMINED |
| | BY THE TEST DESCRIBED IN 10.2.7.3. |
| | 10.2.7.4.2 CLASS II INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH. CLASS II |
| | INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH |
| | SHALL HAVE A CRITICAL RADIANT FLUX OF NOT LESS THAN |
| | 0.22 W/CM2, BUT LESS |
| | THAN 0.45 W/CM2, AS DETERMINED BY THE TEST DESCRIBED IN |
| | 10.2.7.3. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE SPEC SHEETS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) THERE IS AN INDICATION OF NON-BEARING WALL BUT NONE |
| | FOR THE RATED TENANT SEPARATION WALL BY THE PROPOSED |
| | SHOWER. |
| | |
| | THE PROPOSED WORK APPEARS TO INVOLVE THE EXISTING WALL |
| | BOARD AND THUS THE REQUIRED FIRE RATING. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ENSURE |
| | COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
