| Date |
Text |
| 2021-07-07 13:32:02 | 1ST REVIEW FBC-2020 MECHANICAL |
| | PERMIT-21061218 |
| | |
| | CODES IN EFFECT: |
| | |
| | FBC B- FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | FBC M- FLORIDA MECHANICAL CODE |
| | FBC EC- FLORIDA ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | FBC FG- FLORIDA FUEL GAS |
| | FBC EX- FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE |
| | FBC RES- FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE |
| | FS- FLORIDA STATUTES |
| | FAC- FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | WPB- WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC |
| | |
| | PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED. |
| | A COMPLETE REVIEW CANNOT BE COMPLETED UNTIL THE |
| | INFORMATION IS CLEARER AS TO WHAT THIS PERMIT SHALL |
| | INCLUDE. THERE ARE CONFLICTING DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) PLEASE PROVIDE OUTDOOR AIR CALCULATIONS BASED ON THE |
| | 2020 FBC M 403.3.1.1 AND TABLE 403.3.1.1 AND NOT THE |
| | ARCHITECTURAL OCCUPANT LOAD. THE OUTDOOR AIR |
| | CALCULATIONS MUST BE CALCULATED BASED ON THE USE OF |
| | SPACE. ( RTU-1 KITCHEN SHOULD HAVE 182 CFM OF OUTDOOR |
| | AIR WITH 473 CFM OF EXHAUST; THE TOTAL CFM?S OF OUTDOOR |
| | AIR FOR RTU-1 SHOULD BE 204 CFM, WHICH IS LESS THAN THE |
| | 600 CFM PROVIDED BUT THE NUMBERS SHOULD BE RIGHT. RTU-2 |
| | DINING-BAR OUTDOOR AIR SHOULD BE 973 CFM, WHICH IS MORE |
| | THAN THE TOTAL OUTDOOR AIR SHOWN. RTU-3&4 ENERGY |
| | SUMMARY REPORT PAGE 20 INDICATES THE USE OF EACH SPACE. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE OUTDOOR AIR CALCULATIONS BASED ON EACH |
| | USE OF SPACE. FBC 403.3.1.1 AND TABLE 403.3.1.1. BASED |
| | ON THE ENERGY SUMMARY REPORT AND TABLE 403.3.1.1 THE |
| | OUTDOOR AIR REQUIRED FOR THIS TENANT SPACE WOULD BE |
| | 1,100 CFM. |
| | |
| | 2) THE ENERGY SUMMARY REPORT IS FOR A RESTAURANT AND |
| | FOR THE TENANT UPFIT, IT SHOWS THE USE OF SPACE IN THE |
| | FUTURE TENANT UPFIT. THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SIZING |
| | CALCULATIONS DOES NOT SHOW THE SAME SPACES. THE |
| | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS SHOWS THE |
| | FUTURE TENANT SPACE AS A SHELL . |
| | |
| | 3) THE EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS LISTS RTU-3 AND |
| | RTU-4 AS PROJECT NAME: S DIXIE CAF? RESTAURANT WPB. THE |
| | DRAWINGS SHOW THESE TWO UNITS ARE FOR THE FUTURE |
| | TENANT. PLEASE CLEAR UP THIS PROJECT AND ONLY SHOW THE |
| | RESTAURANT IN THIS PROJECT. |
| | |
| | 4) PLEASE PROVIDE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR THIS PROJECT |
| | SHOWING HOW THE NEW RTU?S WILL BE SUPPORTED ON THE |
| | EXISTING ROOF. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 5) SHEET M-3: THE RTU-4 IS NOT SHOWN ON THE OUTDOOR AIR |
| | CALCULATIONS. PLEASE INCLUDE RTU-4 IN THIS TABLE. FBC |
| | 107.2 |
| | |
| | 6) PLEASE SHOW THAT THE NEW RTU?S WILL MEET THE |
| | CLEARANCE AND FALL PROTECTION. FBC M 304.11 |
| | |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM. |
| | |
| | MICHAEL EDWARDS |
| | MECHANICAL EXAMINER |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET |
| | WEST PALM BEACH FL. 33401 |
| | 561-805-6728 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
