| Date |
Text |
| 2021-07-07 10:47:20 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1) A FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS REQUIRED; HOWEVER, THERE |
| | ARE NO FIRE SPRINKLER DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. SIMPLY |
| | STATING SHOP DRAWINGS WILL BE SUBMITTED IS NOT |
| | ACCEPTABLE WITH THE MASTER PERMIT. |
| | |
| | PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004, |
| | FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE |
| | POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF |
| | APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT, |
| | CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR |
| | AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER |
| | SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA) |
| | AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS |
| | PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS. |
| | |
| | 61G15-30.003 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGINEERING |
| | DOCUMENTS. |
| | (1) ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS ARE PREPARED IN THE COURSE OF |
| | PERFORMING ENGINEERING SERVICES. WHEN PREPARED FOR |
| | INCLUSION WITH AN APPLICATION FOR A GENERAL BUILDING |
| | PERMIT, THE DOCUMENTS SHALL MEET ALL ENGINEER?S |
| | RESPONSIBILITY RULES, SET FORTH IN CHAPTERS 61G15-31, |
| | 61G15-32, 61G15-33, AND 61G15-34, F.A.C., AND BE OF |
| | SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND |
| | EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT |
| | WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE, ADOPTED IN SECTION 553.73, F.S., AND APPLICABLE |
| | LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED |
| | BY THE AHJ. THE DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE: |
| | (A) INFORMATION THAT PROVIDES MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS |
| | REQUIRED FOR THE SAFE OPERATION OF THE SYSTEM THAT IS A |
| | RESULT OF ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS, KNOWLEDGE AND |
| | EXPERIENCE. |
| | (B) LIST FEDERAL, STATE, MUNICIPAL, AND COUNTY |
| | STANDARDS, CODES, ORDINANCES, LAWS, AND RULES, WITH |
| | THEIR EFFECTIVE DATES, THAT THE ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS |
| | ARE INTENDED TO CONFORM TO. |
| | (C) INFORMATION, AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD, NEEDED FOR THE SAFE AND EFFICIENT OPERATION OF |
| | THE SYSTEM. |
| | (D) LIST ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA; REFERENCE PROJECT |
| | SPECIFIC STUDIES, REPORTS, AND DELEGATED ENGINEERING |
| | DOCUMENTS. |
| | (E) IDENTIFY CLEARLY ELEMENTS OF THE DESIGN THAT VARY |
| | FROM THE GOVERNING STANDARDS AND DEPICT/IDENTIFY THE |
| | ALTERNATE METHOD USED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | STATED PURPOSE OF THESE RESPONSIBILITY RULES. |
| | (2) ENGINEERS SHALL LEGIBLY INDICATE THEIR NAME AND |
| | BUSINESS ADDRESS, ON ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS. ENGINEERING |
| | DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY OR |
| | CONCEPTUAL USE, SHALL CLEARLY NOTE THE INTENDED PURPOSE |
| | OF SUCH DOCUMENTS. |
| | (3) WHEN ELEMENTS OF THE PROJECT ARE SHOWN ON AN |
| | ENGINEERING DOCUMENT ONLY FOR INFORMATION OR |
| | CLARIFICATION AND THE ENGINEER DOES NOT INTEND TO |
| | ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ELEMENTS, THE ENGINEER |
| | SHALL CLEARLY NOTE ON THE DOCUMENTS THE EXTENT OF HIS |
| | RESPONSIBILITY. |
| | (4) ENGINEERING DRAWINGS SHALL BE LEGIBLE AND CLEARLY |
| | DEFINE AND DELINEATE THE WORK IN THE PROJECT. THEY MUST |
| | ALSO COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 61G15-23, F.A.C., SEALS. |
| | (5) ENGINEERS SHALL CLEARLY NOTE ON ANY PRELIMINARY |
| | ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS THAT SUCH DOCUMENTS ARE NOT IN |
| | FINAL FORM, BUT ARE BEING TRANSMITTED TO THE PUBLIC |
| | AGENCY TO RECEIVE AGENCY REVIEWS, COMMENTS AND |
| | INTERPRETATIONS. THE DOCUMENTS MAY SUBSEQUENTLY BE |
| | REVISED BY THE ENGINEER TO REFLECT RESOLUTION OF ISSUES |
| | WITH THE PUBLIC AGENCY PRIOR TO FINAL ACTION BY THE |
| | AGENCY. CHANGES, REVISIONS AND MODIFICATIONS TO A |
| | PROJECT MAY PROMPT ADDITIONAL DOCUMENT SUBMITTAL FOR |
| | AGENCY APPROVAL ACTION ON THE SAME PROJECT. |
| | SPECIFIC AUTHORITY 471.033(2), 471.008 FS. LAW |
| | IMPLEMENTED 471.033(1)(G), 471.025(3) FS. HISTORY?NEW |
| | 1-26-93, FORMERLY 21H-30.003, AMENDED 11-13-08. |
| | |
| | |
| | 61G15-32.003 COMMON REQUIREMENTS TO ALL FIRE PROTECTION |
| | ENGINEERING |
| | DOCUMENTS. |
| | (1) THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS |
| | SHALL PROVIDE THE ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS TO BE USED |
| | IN THE PREPARATION OF THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM LAYOUT |
| | DOCUMENTS AND TO INDICATE THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE |
| | WORK, AND TO DESCRIBE, DETAIL, DIMENSION, LABEL AND |
| | DEFINE THE FIRE PROTECTION COMPONENTS, SYSTEM(S), |
| | MATERIALS, ASSEMBLIES, EQUIPMENT AND ITS STRUCTURAL AND |
| | UTILITY SUPPORT SYSTEM(S), INSOFAR AS THEY INVOLVE THE |
| | SAFEGUARDING OF LIFE, HEALTH OR PROPERTY. |
| | (2) THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS |
| | SHALL SPECIFY THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE |
| | ACCEPTANCE TESTING OF THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AND |
| | COMPONENTS, WHICH SHALL BE BASED UPON APPLICABLE CODES |
| | AND STANDARDS, WHERE AVAILABLE. |
| | (3) THE OCCUPANCY OF THE AREA OR DESCRIPTION OF A |
| | SPECIFIC HAZARD BEING PROTECTED BY THE FIRE PROTECTION |
| | SYSTEM(S) SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM |
| | ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS. |
| | (4) THE APPLICABLE CODE AND STANDARD TO BE USED IN THE |
| | PREPARATION OF THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM LAYOUT |
| | DOCUMENTS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM |
| | ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS. WHEN CODES AND STANDARDS ARE NOT |
| | AVAILABLE OR APPLICABLE, AND SAID LAYOUT DOCUMENTS ARE |
| | TO BE BASED ON ENGINEERING JUDGMENT, ANY REASONS AND |
| | ASSUMPTIONS MADE TO DEVELOP THE FIRE PROTECTION CONCEPT |
| | SHALL BE IDENTIFIED ON THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM |
| | ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS. |
| | (5) STRUCTURAL SUPPORT AND STRUCTURAL OPENINGS REQUIRED |
| | BY THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE |
| | FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS AND SHALL |
| | BE REFERENCED ON STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS. |
| | (6) WHEN LAYOUT DOCUMENTS CONTAIN MATERIAL DEVIATION |
| | FROM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD'S FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM |
| | ENGINEERING DOCUMENT, SUCH LAYOUT DOCUMENTS ARE NOT |
| | COMPLIANT UNLESS THEY ARE ACCOMPANIED BY REVISED |
| | ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS MADE AND SEALED BY THE ENGINEER |
| | OF RECORD FOR THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM. |
| | (7) REQUIREMENTS FOR ACTIVATION CONTROL SYSTEMS, |
| | SEQUENCE, OPERATING PARAMETERS, INTERLOCKS, SAFETY |
| | RELATED DEVICES, INDICATORS AND ALARMS, SHALL BE SHOWN |
| | ON THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS, |
| | UNLESS SHOWN ON OTHER RELATED DOCUMENTS. |
| | (8) ANY INFORMATION DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE ENGINEER |
| | OF RECORD TO ASSIST THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION |
| | IN UNDERSTANDING THE OWNER?S INTENDED USE AND PROPOSED |
| | PROTECTION OF THE BUILDING OR FACILITY AND TO PROVIDE |
| | SUFFICIENT DIRECTION TO THE INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR OR |
| | OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES REGARDING THE LAYOUT OF THE |
| | SYSTEM(S), SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE FIRE PROTECTION |
| | SYSTEM ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS. |
| | SPECIFIC AUTHORITY 471.008, 471.033(2), FS |
| | LAW IMPLEMENTED 471.005(7), 471.033(2), FS |
| | HISTORY?NEW 5-19-93, FORMERLY 21H-32.003, AMENDED |
| | 4-2-2000, 6-26-01 |
| | |
| | 61G15-32.004 DESIGN OF WATER BASED FIRE PROTECTION |
| | SYSTEMS. |
| | (1) WATER BASED FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS INCLUDE, BUT |
| | ARE NOT LIMITED TO, AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS OF WET, |
| | DRY, FINE WATER SPRAY (MIST), MANUAL, AND DELUGE VALVE |
| | CONTROLLED TYPES, PUMPING SYSTEMS, STANDPIPES, FIRE |
| | WATER MAINS AND DEDICATED FIRE PROTECTION WATER |
| | SOURCES. |
| | (2) TO ENSURE MINIMUM DESIGN QUALITY IN FIRE PROTECTION |
| | SYSTEM ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS, SAID DOCUMENTS SHALL |
| | INCLUDE AS A MINIMUM THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WHEN |
| | APPLICABLE: |
| | (A) THE POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE FIRE PROTECTION WATER |
| | SUPPLY AS DEFINED BY 633.021(18) F.S. |
| | (B) APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARD TO BE APPLIED, OR IN THE |
| | CASE WHERE NO SUCH STANDARD EXISTS, THE ENGINEERING |
| | STUDY, JUDGMENTS, AND/OR PERFORMANCE BASED ANALYSIS AND |
| | CONCLUSIONS. |
| | (C) CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR |
| | AREA. |
| | (D) DESIGN APPROACH, WHICH INCLUDES SYSTEM TYPE, |
| | DENSITIES, DEVICE TEMPERATURE RATING, AND SPACING FOR |
| | EACH SEPARATE 42 HAZARD OCCUPANCY. |
| | (E) CHARACTERISTICS OF WATER SUPPLY TO BE USED, SUCH AS |
| | MAIN SIZE AND LOCATION, WHETHER IT IS DEAD-END OR |
| | CIRCULATING; AND IF DEAD-END, THE DISTANCE TO THE |
| | NEAREST CIRCULATING MAIN, AS WELL AS ITS MINIMUM |
| | DURATION AND RELIABILITY FOR THE MOST HYDRAULICALLY |
| | DEMANDING DESIGN AREA. |
| | (F) WHEN PRIVATE OR PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES ARE USED, THE |
| | FLOW TEST DATA, INCLUDING DATE AND TIME OF TEST, WHO |
| | CONDUCTED TEST OR SUPPLIED INFORMATION, TEST ELEVATION, |
| | STATIC GAUGE PRESSURE AT NO FLOW, FLOW RATE WITH |
| | RESIDUAL GAUGE PRESSURE, HYDRANT BUTT COEFFICIENT, AND |
| | LOCATION OF TEST IN RELATION TO THE HYDRAULIC POINT OF |
| | SERVICE. |
| | (G) VALVING AND ALARM REQUIREMENTS TO MINIMIZE |
| | POTENTIAL FOR IMPAIRMENTS AND UNRECOGNIZED FLOW OF |
| | WATER. |
| | (H) MICROBIAL INDUCED CORROSION (MIC). THE ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD SHALL MAKE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY WATER |
| | SUPPLIES THAT COULD LEAD TO MICROBIAL INDUCED CORROSION |
| | (MIC). SUCH EFFORTS MAY CONSIST OF DISCUSSIONS WITH THE |
| | LOCAL WATER PURVEYOR AND/OR FIRE OFFICIAL, FAMILIARITY |
| | WITH CONDITIONS IN THE LOCAL AREA, OR LABORATORY |
| | TESTING OF WATER SUPPLIES. WHEN CONDITIONS ARE FOUND |
| | THAT MAY RESULT IN MIC CONTAMINATION OF THE FIRE |
| | PROTECTION PIPING, THE ENGINEER SHALL DESIGN CORRECTIVE |
| | MEASURES. |
| | (I) BACKFLOW PREVENTION AND METERING SPECIFICATIONS AND |
| | DETAILS TO MEET LOCAL WATER PURVEYOR REQUIREMENTS |
| | INCLUDING MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE PRESSURE DROP. |
| | (J) QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS OF ALL YARD |
| | AND INTERIOR FIRE PROTECTION COMPONENTS. |
| | (3) CONTRACTOR SUBMITTALS WHICH DEVIATE FROM THE ABOVE |
| | MINIMUM DESIGN PARAMETERS SHALL BE CONSIDERED MATERIAL |
| | DEVIATIONS AND REQUIRE SUPPLEMENTAL ENGINEERING |
| | APPROVAL AND DOCUMENTATION. |
| | (4) IN THE EVENT THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PROVIDES MORE |
| | INFORMATION AND DIRECTION THAN IS ESTABLISHED ABOVE, HE |
| | OR SHE SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TECHNICAL |
| | ACCURACY OF THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE |
| | CODES, STANDARDS, AND SOUND ENGINEERING PRINCIPLES. |
| | SPECIFIC AUTHORITY 471.008, 471.033(2), FS |
| | LAW IMPLEMENTED 471.005(7), 471.033(2), FS |
| | HISTORY?NEW 5-19-93, FORMERLY 21H-32.004, AMENDED |
| | 4-2-2000, 6-26-01, 7-12-05 |
| | |
| | FAC 61G15-32.002 DEFINES THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM |
| | ENGINEERING DOCUMENT (5) AS WELL AS THE FIRE PROTECTION |
| | SYSTEM LAYOUT DOCUMENT (6). 61G15-32.003 OUTLINES THE |
| | COMMON REQUIREMENTS TO ALL FIRE PROTECTIONS ENGINEERING |
| | DOCUMENTS WITH 32.004 (2) (A-J) OUTLINING THE MINIMUM |
| | INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED ON FIRE PROTECTION |
| | ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS FOR WATER BASED SYSTEMS. AS |
| | STATED IN THE DEFINITIONS, THE CONTRACTOR IS TO DEVELOP |
| | THE LAYOUT DOCUMENTS BASED ON THE DESIGN CRITERIA |
| | PROVIDED IN THE FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS |
| | BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR THE FIRE SPRINKLER |
| | SYSTEM. THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM ENGINEERING |
| | DOCUMENTS ARE SUBMITTED FOR THE MASTER PERMIT (BUILDING |
| | PERMIT PER FBC) AND THE LAYOUT DOCUMENTS ARE SUBMITTED |
| | FOR THE FIRE SPRINKLER INSTALLATION PERMIT. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED SIGNED AND SEALED |
| | DOCUMENTATION IN NARRATIVE FORM OR SYSTEM LAYOUT FORM |
| | MEETING THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | SHOULD THE EOR DEFER TO A QUALIFIED CONTRACTOR, A |
| | SIGNED LETTER OF DEFERAL IS REQUIRED AND THEN THE |
| | CONTRATOR IS REQUIRED TO SUBMITT THE FAC REQUIREMENTS |
| | WITH THIS MASTER. |
| | |
| | SHOP DRAWINGS CAN BE DEVELOPED OFF OF THE ABOVE AND |
| | SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) ELECTRICAL SHEETS - THERE IS A FIRE ALARM SYSTEM |
| | INDICATED. |
| | |
| | ALL FIRE ALARM WORK SHALL BE SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE |
| | PERMIT AND SHOP DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE AN APPLIABLE NOTE OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) CIVIL SHEETS - THERE IS FIRE LINE UNDERGROUND WORK |
| | INDICATED. ALL FIRE LINE WORK, INCLUDING THE DDCV, |
| | SHALL BE SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS. A FIRE |
| | SPRINKLER SHOP DRAWING WITH THE UNDERGROUND INDICATED |
| | DOES NOT PERMIT UNDERGROUND WORK. |
| | |
| | INSTALL, TEST AND INSPECT PER NFPA? 24 STANDARD FOR THE |
| | INSTALLATION OF PRIVATE FIRE SERVICE MAINS AND THEIR |
| | APPURTENANCES, 2013 EDITION |
| | |
| | PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE AND PROVIDE AN APPLIABLE NOTE |
| | OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) FIRST FLOOR PLAN - THERE ARE INDICATIONS OF BBQ |
| | GRILLS ON THE POOL DECK, WITHIN 10' OF THE BUILDING, |
| | UNDER A CANOPY AND ALONG A REQUIRED EXIT PATH. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 1 |
| | |
| | 10.10.6 COOKING EQUIPMENT. |
| | 10.10.6.1 FOR OTHER THAN ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS, |
| | NO |
| | HIBACHI, GRILL, OR OTHER SIMILAR DEVICES USED FOR |
| | COOKING, HEATING, |
| | OR ANY OTHER PURPOSE SHALL BE USED OR KINDLED ON ANY |
| | BALCONY, |
| | UNDER ANY OVERHANGING PORTION, OR WITHIN 10 FT (3 M) OF |
| | ANY |
| | STRUCTURE. |
| | 10.10.6.1.1 LISTED ELECTRIC PORTABLE, TABLETOP GRILLS, |
| | NOT TO EXCEED |
| | 200 SQUARE INCHES OF COOKING SURFACE, OR OTHER SIMILAR |
| | APPARATUS |
| | SHALL BE PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | 14.3 EXITS. |
| | 14.3.1 WHERE THIS CODE REQUIRES AN EXIT TO BE SEPARATED |
| | FROM OTHER |
| | PARTS OF THE BUILDING, THE SEPARATING CONSTRUCTION |
| | SHALL MEET THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 8.2 OF NFPA 101 AND THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | (1)* THE SEPARATION SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 1-HOUR FIRE |
| | RESISTANCE |
| | RATING WHERE THE EXIT CONNECTS THREE OR FEWER STORIES. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT OR PROVIDE JUSTIFICTION WITH |
| | SPECIFIC CODE REFERENCES. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 5) SHEET A 212 - THERE IS A DOOR, 132L, FROM THE POOL |
| | DECK TO INSIDE THE PARKING GARAGE, THAT INSWINGS AND |
| | APPEARS TO ENCROACH THE EXIT PATH. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101 CHAPTER 7, MEANS OF EGRESS |
| | |
| | 7.2.1.4.3 DOOR LEAF ENCROACHMENT |
| | 7.2.1.4.3.1 DURING ITS SWING, ANY DOOR LEAF IN A MEANS |
| | OF EGRESS SHALL |
| | LEAVE NOT LESS THAN ONE-HALF OF THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF |
| | AN AISLE, A CORRIDOR, |
| | A PASSAGEWAY, OR A LANDING UNOBSTRUCTED, UNLESS BOTH OF |
| | THE FOLLOWING |
| | CONDITIONS ARE MET: |
| | (1) THE DOOR OPENING PROVIDES ACCESS TO A STAIR IN AN |
| | EXISTING |
| | BUILDING. |
| | (2) THE DOOR OPENING MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF |
| | 7.2.1.4.3.2. |
| | 7.2.1.4.3.2 WHEN FULLY OPEN, ANY DOOR LEAF IN A MEANS |
| | OF EGRESS SHALL |
| | NOT PROJECT MORE THAN 7 IN. (180 MM) INTO THE REQUIRED |
| | WIDTH OF AN AISLE, |
| | A CORRIDOR, A PASSAGEWAY, OR A LANDING, UNLESS THE DOOR |
| | LEAF IS EQUIPPED |
| | WITH AN APPROVED SELF-CLOSING DEVICE AND IS NOT |
| | REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS |
| | OF 7.2.1.4.2 TO SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS |
| | TRAVEL. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT. |
| | |
| | |
| | 5A) SHEET A 212 AND LS SHEETS - DOOR A132L INDICATES |
| | AND EXIT PASSING INTO AND THRU THE PARKING GARAGE. AN |
| | EXIT SHOULD NOT PASS THRU AND UNPROTECTED AREA OF |
| | GREATER HAZARD' |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101 |
| | |
| | 7.5.1.6 EXIT ACCESS FROM ROOMS OR SPACES SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED TO BE |
| | THROUGH ADJOINING OR INTERVENING ROOMS OR AREAS, |
| | PROVIDED THAT SUCH |
| | ROOMS OR AREAS ARE ACCESSORY TO THE AREA SERVED. |
| | FOYERS, LOBBIES, AND |
| | RECEPTION ROOMS CONSTRUCTED AS REQUIRED FOR CORRIDORS |
| | SHALL NOT BE |
| | CONSTRUED AS INTERVENING ROOMS. EXIT ACCESS SHALL BE |
| | ARRANGED SO |
| | THAT IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO PASS THROUGH ANY AREA |
| | IDENTIFIED UNDER |
| | PROTECTION FROM HAZARDS IN CHAPTERS 11 THROUGH 43. |
| | |
| | A PARKING GARAGE IS A STORAGE OCCUPANCY. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT OR JUSTIFY WITH SPECIFIC CODE |
| | REFERNECES |
| | |
| | |
| | 6) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 7) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |