| Date |
Text |
| 2022-02-24 13:28:20 | ** FAILED ** |
| | |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS. RESPOND TO THE |
| | COMMENTS IN WRITING AND/OR ON THE PLANS WHERE |
| | APPLICABLE: |
| | |
| | 1.) THIS PROPERTY IS PART OF A PROPOSED REZONING FOR A |
| | COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD), CURRENTLY IN |
| | REVIEW BY STAFF, AND REQUIRES CITY COMMISSION APPROVAL. |
| | THE PROPOSED WALL IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE CURRENT SITE |
| | DESIGN FOR THE CPD AND CONFLICTS WITH THE REQUIRED 5 |
| | FT. WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE |
| | FOR THE PROPOSED CPD. (REFERENCE: PLANNING BOARD CASE |
| | NO. 1878). |
| | |
| | [6/29/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: TO DATE, STAFF HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED THE RESUBMITTAL FOR THE CPD APPLICATION. ALL |
| | PLANS MUST MATCH FOR CONSISTENCY AND MUST ALSO |
| | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | ZLDRS (I.E. PLACEMENT AND SETBACK DISTANCE). ZONING |
| | SIGN-OFF FOR THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BE GRANTED UNTIL |
| | PLANS MATCH THE PROPOSED CPD APPLICATION FOR |
| | CONSISTENCY. PERMIT TO PROCEED AT THE APPLICANT?S OWN |
| | RISK.] |
| | |
| | |
| | 2.) ILLUSTRATE THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WALL |
| | IN PLANS AS IT RELATES TO THE SCOPE OF THIS PERMIT AND |
| | SHOW SETBACK DIMENSION(S) FROM THE PROPERTY LINES. |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROPOSED WALL MUST MEET THE |
| | MINIMUM SETBACK DISTANCE OF 5 FT. FROM THE FRONT |
| | PROPERTY LINES. THERE IS ALSO AN INCONSISTENCY IN THE |
| | PLANS PROVIDED IN THE PERMIT: ONE PLAN STATES THAT THE |
| | WALL WILL BE ON THE PROPERTY LINE AND ANOTHER PLAN |
| | SHOWS THE PROPOSED WALL INSIDE OF THE PROPERTY LINE. |
| | THE PLANS CANNOT BE IN CONFLICT; ADDRESS FOR |
| | CONSISTENCY [ZLDR S.94-145] |
| | |
| | |
| | 3.) SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY IS OUTDATED AND IS NOT |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED LAND |
| | SURVEYOR. PLEASE PROVIDE A SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEY. |
| | |
| | [6/29/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ADDRESSED. SURVEY STILL |
| | OUTDATED AND NOT SIGNED AND SEALED.] |
| | |
| | |
| | 4.) IF THE PROPOSED WALL IS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE |
| | PROPOSED CPD: A) SITE PLAN MUST BE UPDATED TO REFLECT |
| | AS SUCH. B) PLAN MUST CLEARLY SHOW THE SETBACK DISTANCE |
| | FROM THE PROPERTY LINE(S). SETBACK DISTANCE AND WALL |
| | HEIGHT SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS IN |
| | SEC. 94-302(C) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | REGULATIONS (ZLDRS). THERE ARE INCONSISTENCIES DETECTED |
| | WITH THE PROPOSED LOCATION AND HEIGHT OF THE WALL WITH |
| | THE ZLDRS. |
| | |
| | [6/29/2021 REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF IS STILL WAITING ON |
| | THE RESUBMITTAL FOR THE PROPOSED CPD. PLANS MUST MATCH |
| | FOR CONSISTENCY.] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTES: |
| | |
| | * ANY REVISIONS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | * CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE |
| | QUESTIONS. |
| | |
| | * ZONE: GC |
| | |
| | * REFERENCE PB CASE NO. 1878 (GREENE SCHOOL CPD - IN |
| | REVIEW). |
| | |
