| Date |
Text |
| 2021-05-26 13:26:27 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW: FBC SIXTH EDITION (2017) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | SHORING/RESHORING DOCUMENTS |
| | |
| | 1) [ PARTIALLY RESOLVED. PLEASE SUBMIT DOCUMENTS FROM |
| | THE DELAGATE ENGINEER WITH THE REQUIRED THIRD PARTY |
| | CERTIFIED DIGITAL SIGNATURE AND SUBMIT A CLEAN SET |
| | ALONG WITH A STAMPED SET. KEEP THE NAMES OF EACH SET |
| | CONSISTANT, EXCEPT FOR CLEAN OR STAMPED IN THE NAME. |
| | SEE THE FOLLOWING SPECIFIC INFORMATION. |
| | A)THE GARAGE LEVEL 2 CALCULATIONS, DATED 4/14/2021 |
| | CONSISTING OF 40 PAGES HAS A CLEAN SET OF DOCUMENTS |
| | THAT WAS SUBMITTED BUT IS MISSING THE SET THAT HAS THE |
| | EOR REVIEW STAMPS. |
| | B) THE LEVEL 2 SHORING CALCULATIONS, DATED 1/27/2021 |
| | CONSISTING OF 28 PAGES HAS BOTH A CLEAN SET AND A |
| | STAMPED SET OF DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. THE ONLY ISSUE IS |
| | WITH THE DELEGATE ENGINEER'S SELF-CERTIFIED DIGITAL |
| | SIGNATURE. |
| | C) THE LEVEL 3-6 SHORING AND LEVEL 2-6 RESHORING |
| | CALCULATIONS, DATED 2/16/2021 CONSISTING OF 41 PAGES |
| | HAS A CLEAN SET OF DOCUMENTS THAT WAS SUBMITTED BUT IS |
| | MISSING THE SET THAT HAS THE EOR REVIEW STAMPS. |
| | D) THE FORM WORK STANDARD NOTES LEVEL 2 FORM WORK AND |
| | FRAMING SECTIONS FOR THE NORTH AND SOUTH TOWER, DATED |
| | 1/27/2021 CONSISTING OF 5 PAGES HAS BOTH A CLEAN AND |
| | STAMPED SET OF DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. AGAIN THE ONLY |
| | ISSUE IS WITH THE DELEGATE ENGINEER'S SELF-CERTIFIED |
| | DIGITAL SIGNATURE. |
| | E) THE LEVEL 2 FORM WORK FOR THE GARAGE SECTOR A & B, |
| | DATED 4/14/2021 (DATE 2) CONSISTING OF 10 PAGES HAS A |
| | CLEAN SET OF DOCUMENTS THAT WAS SUBMITTED BUT IS |
| | MISSING THE SET THAT HAS THE EOR REVIEW STAMPS. |
| | F) THE LEVEL 3-6 DECK FORM WORK FOR THE NORTH AND SOUTH |
| | TOWERS, DATED 2/19/2021 CONSISTING OF 8 PAGES HAS A |
| | CLEAN SET OF DOCUMENTS THAT WAS SUBMITTED BUT IS |
| | MISSING THE SET THAT HAS THE EOR REVIEW STAMPS.] |
| | THE SHORING/RESHORING CALCULATIONS AND PLANS ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR |
| | THE PROJECT. THE EOR SHOP REVIEW STAMP IS REQUIRED ON |
| | THE SHORING/RESHORING DOCUMENTS. FBC AMENDMENTS 107.3.4 |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) [ NOT RESOLVED.] THE ENGINEER'S DIGITAL SIGNATURE ON |
| | THE SHORING/RESHORING CALCULATIONS AND PLANS IS |
| | SELF-CERTIFIED. THIRD PARTY CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED |
| | BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF ENGINEERS. FS 471 & 61G15 SEE |
| | THE SIGNATURE REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 3) THE FOLLOWING IS THE PROCEDURE FOR SHORING AND |
| | RESHORING SUBMITTALS. |
| | EMAIL THE PLAN REVIEW REQUEST FORM TO |
| | [email protected]. THE DESCRIPTION SHOULD STATE |
| | WHICH FLOORS ARE INCLUDED IN THE SUBMITTAL. YOU WILL |
| | GET A LINK TO UPLOAD PLANS. |
| | |
| | UPLOAD THE ENGINEERING WHICH WAS REVIEWED BY OTHERS |
| | (CONTRACTOR, EOR, ETC.). THIS SHOULD BE UPLOADED TO THE |
| | SUPPORTING DOCS FOLDER AS MULTIPAGE PDFS. YOU DO NOT |
| | NEED TO UPLOAD INDIVIDUAL PLAN PAGES. UPLOAD MULTI PAGE |
| | PDFS ACCORDING TO SIZE AND SUBMITTAL TYPE (FOR |
| | INSTANCE, CALCULATIONS FOR LEVEL 3-6 WOULD BE ONE PDF, |
| | DRAWINGS FOR LEVEL 3-6 WOULD BE A SEPARATE PDF). |
| | |
| | THE SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMPS MAY HAVE CAUSED THE |
| | DIGITAL SIGNATURE TO GET REMOVED FROM THE DOCUMENT. IF |
| | THAT IS THE CASE, UPLOAD THE ORIGINAL DIGITALLY SIGNED |
| | AND SEALED PDFS TO THE SIGNATURE FOLDER. |
| | |
| | COMPLETE THE TASK IN PROJECTDOX. AFTER THIS IS ROUTED |
| | (YOU CAN SEE WHEN IT IS ROUTED ON OUR WEBSITE), EMAIL |
| | YOUR BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER AND LET HIM KNOW THAT YOU |
| | HAVE SUBMITTED SHORING/RESHORE PLANS. IN THIS CASE IT |
| | IS ROBERT MCDOUGAL ([email protected]). IF YOU GET AN |
| | AUTOMATIC REPLY THAT YOUR REVIEWER IS OUT OF THE |
| | OFFICE, EMAIL [email protected], [email protected], AND |
| | [email protected] AND LET US KNOW THAT YOU HAVE A |
| | SHORING/RESHORE SUBMITTAL TO BE REVIEWED. ONE OF US |
| | WILL ENSURE THAT IT IS REVIEWED TIMELY. |
| | |
| | YOUR SHORING/RESHORE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REVIEWED WITHIN |
| | A FEW BUSINESS DAYS OF SUBMITTAL IF YOU EMAIL THE |
| | BUILDING REVIEWER. IF YOU HAVE A POUR SCHEDULED, PLEASE |
| | LET US KNOW. PLEASE SUBMIT AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE. WE |
| | WILL ACCOMMODATE A REQUEST FOR A SAME DAY REVIEW IF |
| | POSSIBLE, BUT SUBMITTING AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE WILL |
| | PREVENT A CRISIS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU DO NOT HAVE SHORING/RESHORE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED, |
| | AND ISSUED BY THE CITY, YOU CANNOT POUR CONCRETE AS PER |
| | YOUR SPECIAL INSPECTOR AGREEMENT. |
| | |
| | 4) WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A |
| | RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE |
| | CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FEEL |
| | FREE TO CALL ME. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
