| Date |
Text |
| 2021-08-12 18:19:17 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #21040876 |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1-PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1106 |
| | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING AND SEC. R101.5 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | NOTE: PLEASE MAKE SURE FORMS ARE PROPERLY SIGNED BY ALL |
| | REQUIRED PARTIES AND IS COORDINATED WITH PLANS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | A)THE ENERGY FORM R405-2020 IS REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED |
| | AND DATED BY THE OWNER, ARCHITECT OR OWNER?S LEGALLY |
| | DESIGNATED AGENT AT THE BOTTOM OF FORM SUBMITTED AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, |
| | PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE PERMIT TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | B)THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | SUBMITTED. ONE IS FORM 405-2020 PREPARED BY M. ABBOTT |
| | AND FORM R402-2020 PREPARED BY THE ARCHITECT. |
| | INFORMATION ON FORM R402-2020 DOESN'T MEET THE MINIMUM |
| | PRESCRIPTIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE GLAZED FENESTRATION |
| | (SHGC) AND THE A/C UNIT CAN NOT BE INSTALLED IN THE |
| | ATTIC. THIS FORM CAN NOT BE USED. PLEASE REMOVE THIS |
| | FORM. |
| | USE FORM R405-2020 AND MAKE SURE IS SIGNED BY THE OWNER |
| | OR ARCHITECT TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | C) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING THE BUILDER'S NAME, JURISDICTION NUMBER (THIS |
| | IS JURISDICTION #604700). SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | D)PROVIDE CORRECT INFORMATION FOR ITEM #2. THE QUESTION |
| | ON THIS ITEM IS SINGLE FAMILY OR MULTIPLE FAMILY?. |
| | "DETACHED IS NOT THE ANSWER. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | E) COORDINATE ATTIC INSULATION AND ATTIC VENTILATION |
| | WITH ARCHITECT'S PLANS. THESE ITEMS WILL NEED TO BE |
| | REVISED BY THE ARCHITECT. SEE ITEMS #2(B) AND #7(D) |
| | BELOW. |
| | |
| | E)DOOR INFORMATION SHOWS A 1FT X 5FT DOOR ON THE SOUTH |
| | SIDE. PLANS DON'T SHOW THIS DOOR. WHERE IS THIS DOOR |
| | LOCATED AT?. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | F)BUILDER TO SIGN AND COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE |
| | LEVEL (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.4.3 FBC- ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- PROVIDE COMPLETE ROOF FRAMING PLAN FOR THE ADDITION. |
| | CLEARLY SPECIFY ALL FRAMING MEMBERS AND CONNECTORS. |
| | ALSO, CLEARLY SPECIFY CONNECTION TO EXISTING. |
| | SEC. R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET A-3 SPECIFIES ROOF |
| | TRUSSES. IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW TRUSSES ARE BUILT IF ONLY |
| | TOP CHORD IS SHOWN. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #6 BELOW. |
| | REVISE/CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | FRAMING OF THE NEW ROOF CORNERS IS NOT CLEAR. ROOF |
| | FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET S-1 SHOW THE STRUCTURAL ROOF |
| | FRAMING MEMBERS BEING SPACED MORE THAN 24" O.C. AND IT |
| | LOOKS LIKE THE CORNER IS NOT PROPERLY FRAMED TO SUPPORT |
| | THE REQUIRED LOADS, SPECIALLY AT THE CANTILEVERED ROOF |
| | AREA ON THE NORTH CORNER OF THE ROOF. PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | FRAMING DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS FOR BOTH CORNERS. SPECIFY |
| | ALL FRAMING MEMBERS AND CONNECTORS AT ALL ENDS. SEC. |
| | R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B)BASED ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET S-1 AND THE |
| | TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET A-3, IT LOOKS LIKE THE |
| | INTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT IS TO DESIGN AN UNVENTED |
| | ATTIC. ARCHITECT TO PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS |
| | SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R806.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL FOR |
| | UNVENTED ATTIC AND UNVENTED ENCLOSED RAFTER ASSEMBLIES. |
| | TYPICALLY, THIS IS DONE USING FOAM INSULATION. |
| | NOTE: IF SPECIFYING FOAM INSULATION, THEN PROVIDE ICC |
| | EVALUATION REPORT REVIEWED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD |
| | PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. |
| | NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM #7(D) BELOW. |
| | |
| | 3- OK |
| | 4- OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 5-PROVIDE COMPLETE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA. SEC. R301.2.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | SPECIFY BUILDING EXPOSURE, ULTIMATE AND NOMINAL WIND |
| | SPEED. |
| | |
| | 6- OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 7- TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET A-3: |
| | A)PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS CLEARLY SHOWING HOW COMPLYING |
| | WITH THE NEW 2020 CODE REQUIREMENT FOR ROOFING |
| | UNDERLAYMENT. SEC. R905.1.1.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL OF PEEL AND STICK UNDERLAYMENT |
| | SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT. NOTE: PEEL AND STICK |
| | UNDERLAYMENT SHALL BE APPROVED FOR SHINGLES OVER 30# |
| | ASPHALT FELT AS SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT. |
| | |
| | B)OK |
| | C)OK |
| | |
| | D)WALL SECTION SPECIFIES R-30 CEILING INSULATION. |
| | CLEARLY SPECIFY WHAT TYPE OF INSULATIONS IS PROPOSED. |
| | BUTT INSULATION OR FOAM INSULATION. ALSO, IT IS NOT |
| | CLEAR IF R-30 INSULATION WILL FIT IN THIS CEILING AREA. |
| | VERIFY AS REQUIRED. WALL SECTION SHOWS ROOF RAFTERS BUT |
| | IT SPECIFIES ROOF TRUSSES. COORDINATE WITH ITEM #2 |
| | ABOVE. |
| | NOTE: IF SPECIFYING FOAM INSULATION, THEN PROVIDE ICC |
| | EVALUATION REPORT REVIEWED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD |
| | PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | BASED ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET S-1 AND THE |
| | TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET A-3, IT LOOKS LIKE THE |
| | INTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT IS TO DESIGN AN UNVENTED |
| | ATTIC. ARCHITECT TO PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS |
| | SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R806.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL FOR |
| | UNVENTED ATTIC AND UNVENTED ENCLOSED RAFTER ASSEMBLIES. |
| | TYPICALLY, THIS IS DONE USING FOAM INSULATION. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED AND REVISE INSULATION R-VALUE ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | NOTE: IF SPECIFYING FOAM INSULATION, THEN PROVIDE ICC |
| | EVALUATION REPORT REVIEWED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD |
| | PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | E) OK |
| | |
| | F)WALL SECTION SPECIFIES SOFFIT VENTS AT 96" O.C. |
| | SOFFIT NEEDS CROSS VENTILATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R806.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. WALL SECTIONS SHOWS ROOF |
| | RAFTERS. ROOF RAFTERS DON'T PROVIDE CROSS VENTILATION |
| | WHEN THE VENTS ARE SPACED AT 96" O.C. THIS NEED TO BE |
| | COORDINATED WITH ITEM #2 ABOVE AND REVISE WALL SECTION |
| | SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | COORDINATE WITH ITEM #7(D) ABOVE. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 8- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | 61G20-3.001 FOR |
| | (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION PRIOR TO |
| | INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL): |
| | |
| | A)ROOF SHINGLES. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NOA 20-0318.05 SUBMITTED IS ONLY FOR THE RIDGE CAP |
| | SHINGLES. NEED TO PROVIDE THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR TH |
| | SHINGLES ALSO. |
| | |
| | B)PEEL AND STICK UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED BY THE |
| | ARCHITECT. NOTE: PEEL AND STICK UNDERLAYMENT SHALL BE |
| | APPROVED FOR SHINGLES OVER 30# ASPHALT FELT AS |
| | SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT. |
| | |
| | 9- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | TO AVOID MORE DELAYS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF |
| | YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
