| Date |
Text |
| 2021-08-24 17:55:42 | RESIDENTIAL (R3)ADDITION, THIRD REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 7TH EDITION (2020) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #21040699 |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT |
| | NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT |
| | DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE |
| | TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION |
| | SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, |
| | INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, |
| | STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, |
| | VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS |
| | SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF |
| | THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO |
| | CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH |
| | TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED |
| | FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT |
| | OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS |
| | REVIEW |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1-SHEET S2.01: |
| | LIVE AND DEAD LOADS SPECIFIED UNDER THE DESIGN CRITERIA |
| | AND STRUCTURAL NOTES ARE NOT CLEAR. CLEARLY SPECIFY THE |
| | TOP CHORD LIVE LOADS, TOP CHORD DEAD LEADS AND BOTTOM |
| | CHORD LIVE LOADS, DEAD LOADS. SEC. R301.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND TABLE R301.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ARCHITECT SPECIFIED TRUSS TOP CHORD-DEAD LOAD=0 PSF. |
| | THIS IS INCORRECT. THERE IS ALWAYS A DEAD LOAD TO BE |
| | CONSIDERED. REVISE AS REQUIRED AND TAKE INTO |
| | CONSIDERATION THERE IS ROOF TILE ON THIS PROJECT. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2-REVISE ROOF ZONE UPLIFT DIAGRAM TO REFLECT ALL ROOF |
| | ZONES CHANGES DONE FOR 2020 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEE FIGURE |
| | R301.2(7) FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | NOTE: CLARIFY IF THE SPECIFIED DESIGN PRESSURES ARE |
| | ULTIMATE DESIGN PRESSURES OR NOMINAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT FOR ZONES |
| | 2E AND 2R ARE LOWER THAN THOSE FOR ZONE 3 FOR HIP |
| | ROOFS. ACCORDING TO FIGURE R301.2(7) FBC-RESIDENTIAL |
| | AND TABLE R301.2(2)FBC-RESIDENTIAL ZONES 2E, 2R AND 3 |
| | HAVE THE SAME DESIGN PRESSURES. REVISE THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES SHOWN UNDER THE ROOF DIAGRAM. |
| | NOTE: SIMILAR COMMENT APPLIES TO DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN |
| | ON GABLE ROOF. |
| | |
| | 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | 61G20-3.001 FOR |
| | (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION PRIOR TO |
| | INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS): |
| | |
| | A)ROOF TILE ADHESIVE SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OF |
| | RECORD. |
| | |
| | B)OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR SIZE SPECIFIED ON DOOR SCHEDULE. |
| | (18' X 9'). AND, NEED DOOR THAT MEETS THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES SHOWN ON REVISED SHEET S1.01. |
| | |
| | C)SWING GARAGE DOOR SIZE SPECIFIED ON DOOR SCHEDULE |
| | (3'X 9'). AND, NEED DOOR THAT MEETS THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES CALCULATED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD. |
| | |
| | 4-DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. NOTE: NEED |
| | TO REVISE PRODUCT APPROVALS LETTER. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
