| Plan Review Notes For Permit 21031584 |
| Permit Number |
21031584 |
|
| Review Stop |
B |
| Sequence Number |
1 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2021-03-30 18:25:04 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. THE NEW PLAN PAGES D110 AND D120 DO NOT SHOW THE | | | "EXISTING FLOOR FINISH TO DEMOLISH". REVISE PLAN | | | ACCORDINGLY, FBC 107. THE LEGEND NEEDS TO BE REVISED AS | | | WELL AS FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR PLANS. | | | | | | 2. ENSURE THAT ALL TEXT IN THE NEW PLAN IS LEGIBLE. FOR | | | INSTANCE, SEE D120, TEXT ON THE PLANS INDICATING THE | | | DOOR TO BE ENLARGED, FBC 107. | | | | | | 3. DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ARCHITECT AND SUBMITTED FOR | | | PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED | | | ORIGINALS, FLORIDA STATUTE 481. THE PLANS PROVIDED ARE | | | THE SAME PLANS THAT WERE PREPARED BY THE ARCHITECT BUT | | | HAVE THE ARCHITECT'S TITLE BLOCK REPLACED WITH THE | | | CONTRACTOR'S INFORMATION. BUILDING OFFICIAL DETERMINED | | | THAT IS ACCEPTABLE BUT WE NEED A SIGNED, SEALED LETTER | | | FROM THE ARCHITECT AUTHORIZING USE OF HIS PLANS. A | | | LETTER WAS SUBMITTED BUT IS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED AS | | | REQUESTED VIA EMAIL. | | | | | | AN EMAIL WAS SENT TO ALL PARTIES WHICH SHOWED SCREEN | | | SHOTS OF SHEET D110. D120 HAS THE SAME ISSUE. THE | | | HATCHED LINES DO NOT APPEAR BECAUSE THE QUALITY OF THE | | | PLAN PROVIDED IS VERY POOR. | | | | | | |
|
