| Plan Review Notes For Permit 21031501 |
| Permit Number |
21031501 |
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
| Sequence Number |
1 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2021-04-12 13:29:18 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE | | | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | | | | 1) SHEET A 1.1 - THE PROPOSED DOUBLE DOOR INDICATES | | | THAT THEY OPEN UP INTO THE EGRESS CORRIDOR. | | | | | | THERE ARE NO DIMENSIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE FOR DOOR | | | LEAF ENCROACHMENT | | | | | | PER NFPA 101 CHAPTER 7, MEANS OF EGRESS | | | | | | 7.2.1.4.3 DOOR LEAF ENCROACHMENT | | | 7.2.1.4.3.1 DURING ITS SWING, ANY DOOR LEAF IN A MEANS | | | OF EGRESS SHALL | | | LEAVE NOT LESS THAN ONE-HALF OF THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF | | | AN AISLE, A CORRIDOR, | | | A PASSAGEWAY, OR A LANDING UNOBSTRUCTED, UNLESS BOTH OF | | | THE FOLLOWING | | | CONDITIONS ARE MET: | | | (1) THE DOOR OPENING PROVIDES ACCESS TO A STAIR IN AN | | | EXISTING | | | BUILDING. | | | (2) THE DOOR OPENING MEETS THE REQUIREMENT OF | | | 7.2.1.4.3.2. | | | 7.2.1.4.3.2 WHEN FULLY OPEN, ANY DOOR LEAF IN A MEANS | | | OF EGRESS SHALL | | | NOT PROJECT MORE THAN 7 IN. (180 MM) INTO THE REQUIRED | | | WIDTH OF AN AISLE, | | | A CORRIDOR, A PASSAGEWAY, OR A LANDING, UNLESS THE DOOR | | | LEAF IS EQUIPPED | | | WITH AN APPROVED SELF-CLOSING DEVICE AND IS NOT | | | REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS | | | OF 7.2.1.4.2 TO SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS | | | TRAVEL. | | | | | | PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OR CORRECT. | | | | | | | | | 2) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET | | | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE | | | ABOVE. | | | | | | | | | 3) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE | | | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] |
|