| Date |
Text |
| 2021-02-16 15:01:17 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET FA 1 - THERE ARE INDICATIONS OF CIRCUITS AND |
| | DEVICES ARE CLASS B. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND EXPLAIN WHAT HAPPENS IF A BREAK |
| | OCCURS, DO THE DEVICES DOWN LINE CONTINUE TO FUNCTION |
| | OR DOES IT SIMPLY GO TO TROUBLE? |
| | |
| | IT IS IMPERAIVE IN A HIGH RISE BUILDING THAT THE FA |
| | DEVICES ARE CLASS A OR THAT NO DEVICE IS NOT FUNCTIONAL |
| | DUE TO A BREAK OR TROUBLE? |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) THERE ARE INDICATIONS OF TWO NFPA 72 CODE REFERENCES |
| | THAT DO NOT APPEAR TO BE RELATED TO THE INTENT. |
| | |
| | UNDER EXISTING POWER SUPPLY #N8 IT STATES REQUIRED |
| | OPERATION TIME FROM NFPA 72 10.2.6.2.2 & 10.5.6.3.1. |
| | |
| | I AM NOT SURE WHAT CODE EDITION IT IS CITING BUT NFPA |
| | 72 2013 , DOES NOT HAVE THOSE REFERENCES. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) THERE ARE INDICATIONS OF TWO NFPA 72 CODE REFERENCES |
| | THAT DO NOT APPEAR TO BE RELATED TO THE INTENT. |
| | |
| | UNDER EXISTING NFS - 3030 FACP IT STATES REQUIRED |
| | OPERATION TIME FROM NFPA 72 4.4.1.5.2.2(1) & |
| | 4.4.1.5.3.1 |
| | |
| | I AM NOT SURE WHAT CODE EDITION IT IS CITING BUT NFPA |
| | 72 2013 , DOES NOT HAVE THOSE REFERENCES. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 5) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
