| Date |
Text |
| 2021-04-19 08:53:01 | RESIDENTIAL (R3)ALTERATION FOURTH BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #20121415 |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | NOTE: NEED TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT THE HEAT SOURCE |
| | FOR NEW BEDROOM #3 AND ROOM FACING THE BEDROOM. THIS |
| | WAS REQUESTED BY THE MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER. I |
| | DIDN'T SEE ANY INFORMATION SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS |
| | REQUIREMENT. IF USING WINDOW UNITS, THEN NEED DEDICATED |
| | OUTLETS (220 OUTLET MAY BE REQUIRED). SEC. R303.10 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER COMMENTS STILL HAVE NOT BEEN |
| | ADDRESSED. AT THIS POINT IT IS NOT KNOWN IF THE |
| | SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT IS ADEQUATE TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED |
| | HEAT IN THE NEW HABITABLE AREAS. NEED HEATING |
| | CALCULATIONS AND EQUIPMENT SPECS AS REQUESTED TO THE |
| | ENGINEER BY THE MECHANICAL REVIEWER. |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT |
| | NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT |
| | DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE |
| | TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION |
| | SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, |
| | INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, |
| | STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, |
| | VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS |
| | SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF |
| | THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO |
| | CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH |
| | TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED |
| | FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT |
| | OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS |
| | REVIEW |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS LOW. |
| | VALUATION IS FOR ALL WORK SHOWN ON PLANS THAT WAS DONE |
| | WITHOUT PERMITS. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, |
| | MATERIALS, CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. UPDATE VALUATION AS REQUIRED, INCLUDING |
| | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. VALUATION WAS NOT |
| | UPDATED. |
| | |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
