| Date |
Text |
| 2022-07-12 16:52:59 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) FOURTH BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #20121077 |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PAY $2364.36 FEE OF FOUR TIMES |
| | THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE |
| | ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW. |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT |
| | NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT |
| | DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE |
| | TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION |
| | SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, |
| | INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, |
| | STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, |
| | VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS |
| | SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF |
| | THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO |
| | CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH |
| | TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED |
| | FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT |
| | OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS |
| | REVIEW |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2-PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | A)DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWS A 6 INCH SWALE IMMEDIATELY |
| | ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING RESIDENCE #837. THE PROPOSED |
| | SWALE AFFECTS THE FOUNDATION. ENGINEER OF RECORD TO |
| | PROVIDE DETAILS SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW PROTECTING |
| | THE FOOTING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R401.3 BC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | B)DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWS A PERMANENT TRENCH AND SILT FENCE |
| | TO CONTAIN THE SURFACE DRAINAGE. NEED TO APPLY FOR A |
| | SEPARATE FENCE PERMIT FOR ZONING APPROVAL. SEC. 105.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3-SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS SIZE AND LOCATION SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ATTIC ACCESS WAS RELOCATED, BUT BASED ON THE ROOF |
| | FRAMING PLAN, THE LOCATION OF THE ATTIC ACCESS DOESN'T |
| | SEEM TO PROVIDE PROVIDE THE HEADROOM CLEARANCE REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. ATTIC ACCESS IS LOCATED |
| | BETWEEN TWO GABLE END ROOFS. ALSO, BASED ON SECTION 2 |
| | ON SHEET S-3, THERE IS A MASONRY WALL BETWEEN THE FRONT |
| | PART OF THE HOUSE AND THE REAR PART OF THE HOUSE. |
| | THEREFORE, THERE IS NOT ACCESS TO OTHER ROOF AREAS. |
| | EACH ROOF AREA NEEDS AN ATTIC ACCESS. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 6- BEAM SCHEDULE ON SHEET S-2 ONLY SPECIFIES B-1 BEAM. |
| | IT DOESN'T SPECIFY THE RAKE BEAM SHOWN ON SHEET S-4. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO CLARIFY. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SECTION 2 ON SHEET S-3 SHOWS A MASONRY WALL BETWEEN THE |
| | FRONT PART OF THE HOUSE AND THE REAR PART OF THE HOUSE. |
| | ROOF FRAMING PLAN ON SHEET S-2 DOESN'T SPECIFY THE BEAM |
| | SUPPORTING THE MASONRY WALL. |
| | ROOF FRAMING PLAN DOESN'T SHOW HOW THE TWO REAR GABLE |
| | END ROOFS ARE SUPPORTED AT THE INTERSECTION OF BOTH |
| | ROOFS. |
| | FRONT PORCH WOOD BEAM SIZE AND ROOF RAFTERS SIZE |
| | SPECIFIED ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN AND WOOD BEAM |
| | SPECIFIED ON SECTION 2 ON SHEET S-3 DON'T MATCH. |
| | SECTION 2 ON SHEET S-3 SHOWS OUTLOOKERS IN THE MIDDLE |
| | MASONRY WALL. THE OUTLOOKERS ARE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF |
| | THE SECTION BY THE GABLE END AREA. REVISE/CLARIFY WALL |
| | SECTION AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 7- PLANS DON'T PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ROOF |
| | SHEATHING. SPECIFY TYPE, THICKNESS AND ROOF SHEATHING |
| | FASTENING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET |
| | A-1 DOESN'T MATCH INFORMATION SHOWN ON OTHER PLANS AND |
| | SECTIONS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH TO AVOID MORE |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ROOF SHEATHING SPECIFICATIONS DON'T |
| | MATCH SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON SHEET S-5. FOOTING SIZE |
| | DOESN'T MATCH FOUNDATION PLAN. ATTIC INSULATION DOESN'T |
| | MATCH. ETC. |
| | NOTE: ENGINEER TO COORDINATE ALL PLANS, SECTIONS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS TO AVOID MORE CONFLICTS AND DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 8- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| | STEEL COLUMNS SHOWN ON THE FRONT PORCH. SPECIFY TOP AND |
| | BOTTOM CONNECTORS AND FURRING DETAILS. |
| | SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SECTION 2 ON SHEET S-3 SHOWS STEEL COLUMNS BELOW GRADE. |
| | THIS INFORMATION DOESN'T MATCH INFORMATION SHOWN ON THE |
| | FOUNDATION PLAN. FOUNDATION PLAN SHOWS A KNEE WALL. |
| | ALSO, THERE ARE NO DETAIL/SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW |
| | THE STEEL COLUMNS AND CONNECTIONS ARE PROTECTED AGAINST |
| | RUST/DETERIORATION. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 9- PROVIDE DOORS AND WINDOWS STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL. |
| | NOTE: STRUCTURAL BUCK NEEDS TO PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO |
| | THE DOOR FRAME AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R609.7.2.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | BUCK DETAIL ON SHEET A1 DOESN'T PROVIDE THE STRUCTURAL |
| | BUCK SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUESTED AND DOESN'T SEEM TO |
| | APPLY TO THIS JOB. |
| | |
| | 11- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | 61G20-3.001 FOR |
| | A)OK. ROOF SHINGLES FL31588-R2. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | D)HARDIEBOARD SIDING. INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS NOT A |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL. NEED MIAMI DADE NOA OR COMPLETE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX |
| | DOESN'T MATCH FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER NAMED IN |
| | PROJECTDOX SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. ONE OF THEM IS |
| | FL13223-R7 AND THE OTHER ONE IS FL13192.2. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | NOTE: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLEASE UPLOAD THE FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE AND INSTALLATION |
| | INSTRUCTION ON THE SAME FILE. DON'T SPLIT THEM INTO TWO |
| | SEPARATE FILES. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | E) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. NEW COMMENT BASED ON REVISED |
| | PLANS. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SINGLE HUNG WINDOW |
| | SIZE SPECIFIED ON PLANS FO WINDOW A. NEW 72"W X 52"H |
| | SINGLE HUNG WINDOW. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOA SUBMITTED DOESN'T COVER 72" WIDE |
| | WINDOW. NEED TO PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT COVERS |
| | THIS WINDOW SIZE AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | F) PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SHINGLES UNDERLAYMENT |
| | SPECIFIED ON TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET A-1. |
| | |
| | 12- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 14- PROVIDE COMPLETE WALL SECTION FROM FOUNDATION |
| | THROUGH ROOF AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.5.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISE NEW TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET A1: |
| | A) FOOTING SIZE DOESN'T MATCH SIZE SPECIFIED ON THE |
| | FOUNDATION PLAN. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | C)ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT CLEAR. |
| | NOTE: SEE SECTION R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND FIGURE |
| | R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ROOD SHEATHING SPECIFICATIONS ON TYPICAL WALL SECTION |
| | AND SPECIFICATIONS ON SHEET S-5 DON'T MATCH. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH. NOTE: SEE SECTION R803.2.3.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND FIGURE R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | D) ROOF INSULATION ON TYPICAL WALL SECTION AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS ON SHEET S-3 DON'T MATCH. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 17- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION OF THE FRONT AND BACK GUARDRAILS SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R312.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. DESIGN INFORMATION NEEDS |
| | TO BE SHOWN ON PLANS BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS OR SHOP DRAWINGS ARE DEFERRED SUBMITTALS JUST |
| | TO CONFIRM THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL |
| | OF RECORD. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
