| Date |
Text |
| 2021-10-21 15:18:16 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) THIRD BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #20121077 |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT |
| | NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORRCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT |
| | DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE |
| | TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION |
| | SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, |
| | INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, |
| | STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, |
| | VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS |
| | SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF |
| | THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO |
| | CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH |
| | TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED |
| | FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT |
| | OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS |
| | REVIEW |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2-PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | A) PROVIDE DIMENSIONS ON TYPICAL WET SWALE CROSS |
| | SECTION. SPECIFY DEPTH OF SWALE, DISTANCE FROM |
| | BUILDING, ETC. SEC. 1072.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | B) PROVIDE TRENCH WITH GRAVEL DETAIL #1 AS SHOWN ON |
| | DRAINAGE PLAN ALONG PERIMETER OF LOT. DETAIL WAS NOT |
| | GIVEN. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3-SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS SIZE AND LOCATION SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | BASED ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLAN, THE LOCATION OF THE |
| | ATTIC ACCESS DOESN'T PROVIDE THE CLEARANCE REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 6- BEAM SCHEDULE ON SHEET S-2 ONLY SPECIFIES B-1 BEAM. |
| | IT DOESN'T SPECIFY THE RAKE BEAM SHOWN ON SHEET S-4. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO CLARIFY. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISED ROOF FRAMING PLAN IS INCOMPLETE. IT IS MISSING |
| | THE ROOF AT THE ENTRY PORCH. THERE IS NOT CORRELATION |
| | BETWEEN THE WOOD BEAM SCHEDULES AND THE ROOF FRAMING |
| | PLAN. THERE IS NOT TRUSS CONNECTOR SCHEDULE. THERE IS |
| | NOT INFORMATION ABOUT THE GABLE END BEAMS. ARE THESE |
| | CONCRETE RAKED BEAMS?. THERE IS NOT INFORMATION FOR |
| | PORCH BEAMS, COLUMNS, ALL STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS OF ALL |
| | STRUCTURAL MEMBERS (ROOF TRUSSES, BEAMS AND COLUMNS). |
| | NEW ROOF FRAMING PLAN SHOWS TWO GABLE END ROOFS |
| | INTERSECTING ON THE REAR OF THE HOUSE. SEE REAR |
| | ELEVATION ON SHEET A-2. NEED TO PROVIDE DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS FOR CRICKET CONSTRUCTION IN THIS AREA. |
| | NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE ROOF FRAMING PLAN WITH ALL THE |
| | INFORMATION. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 7- PLANS DON'T PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ROOF |
| | SHEATHING. SPECIFY TYPE, THICKNESS AND ROOF SHEATHING |
| | FASTENING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ENGINEER'S RESPONSE SAID SEE REVISED SHEET S-3. |
| | SECTIONS 1 AND 2 ON SHEET S-3 DON'T MATCH REVISED ROOF |
| | FRAMING PLAN. SEE NEW ROOF PROFILE. THERE ARE NO |
| | SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ROOF SHEATHING. PORCH |
| | CONSTRUCTION DOESN'T MATCH PORCH SHOWN ON THE EXTERIOR |
| | ELEVATIONS AND NEEDS MORE INFORMATION. FRAMING AT GABLE |
| | ENDS IS NOT CLEAR. HOW THE GABLE END IS GOING TO BE |
| | BUILT. SPECIFY ALL GABLE FRAMING MEMBERS AND |
| | CONNECTORS. NEED COLUMNS CONNECTOR AT TOP AND BOTTOM, |
| | WOOD BEAM SHOWN DON'T REFLECT (2)2X12 WOOD BEAM. DETAIL |
| | SHOWS FOUR 2X12'S. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: ENGINEER OF RECORD TO COORDINATE ALL PLANS, |
| | DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO AVOID MORE CONFLICTS AND |
| | DELAYS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 8- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| | STEEL COLUMNS SHOWN ON THE FRONT PORCH. SPECIFY TOP AND |
| | BOTTOM CONNECTORS AND FURRING DETAILS. |
| | SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. SEE RESPONSE TO ITEM #6 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 9- PROVIDE DOORS AND WINDOWS STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL. |
| | NOTE: STRUCTURAL BUCK NEEDS TO PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO |
| | THE DOOR FRAME AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R609.7.2.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | 11- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | 61G20-3.001 FOR |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A)ROOF MATERIAL FOR PITCHED ROOF AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NOA 19-0617.05 SUBMITTED NOW IS NOT FOR SHINGLES. WRONG |
| | NOA AGAIN. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | D)HARDIEBOARD SIDING. INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS NOT A |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL. NEED MIAMI DADE NOA OR COMPLETE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NOA 20-0730.05 SUBMITTED IS FOR INSTALLATION TO WOOD |
| | FRAMED BUILDINGS. THIS HOUSE IS CONCRETE BLOCK. NEED |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR INSTALLATION ON CONCRETE BLOCK |
| | CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | E) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. NEW COMMENT BASED ON REVISED |
| | PLANS. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SINGLE HUNG WINDOW |
| | SIZE SPECIFIED ON PLANS FO WINDOW A. NEW 72"W X 52"H |
| | SINGLE HUNG WINDOW. |
| | |
| | 12- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | (INCLUDING THE HARDIEBOARD SIDING) AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 14- PROVIDE COMPLETE WALL SECTION FROM FOUNDATION |
| | THROUGH ROOF AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.5.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISE NEW TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET A1: |
| | A) FOOTING SIZE DOESN'T MATCH SIZE SPECIFIED ON THE |
| | FOUNDATION PLAN. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B)ROOFING COVER AND UNDERLAYMENT SPECIFIED IS NOT |
| | CLEAR. THESE SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT FOR SHINGLES. |
| | COORDINATE WITH PRODUCT APPROVAL COMMENT ABOVE. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | C)ROOF SHEATHING NAILING SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT CLEAR. |
| | COORDINATE WITH ITEM #7 ABOVE. NOTE: SEE TABLE |
| | R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL FOR MINIMUM ROOF SHEATHING |
| | ATTACHMENT. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | 16- FOUNDATION PLAN ON SHEET S1: |
| | A)MISSING THE FOOTING FOR THE FRONT AND REAR PORCHES. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B)FOUNDATION PLANS DOESN'T SHOW THE FOOTINGS SHOWN ON |
| | THE FOOTING SCHEDULE. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | C) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION OF FRONT AND REAR STAIRWAYS SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R311.7 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 17- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION OF THE FRONT AND BACK GUARDRAILS SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R312.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
