| Date |
Text |
| 2021-08-17 13:10:40 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | PERMIT #20121077 |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | ARCHITECTS WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONALS DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT |
| | NECESSARY, IN ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT |
| | DESIGN DOCUMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE |
| | TIMES FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION |
| | SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, |
| | INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, |
| | STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, |
| | VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS |
| | SYSTEMS, OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF |
| | THE FLORIDA BUILDING COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO |
| | CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH |
| | TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED |
| | FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT |
| | OF THE PROPORTION OF THE PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS |
| | REVIEW |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1-ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | A) THE BUILDING'S OWNER, THE OWNER'S ARCHITECT, OR |
| | OTHER AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER |
| | SHALL CERTIFY THAT THE BUILDING IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE CODE, AS PER SECTION 553.907, FLORIDA STATUTES, |
| | PRIOR TO RECEIVING THE PERMIT TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION OR |
| | RENOVATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | B) PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE PERSON DOING THE |
| | CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.4.2.1 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | C)PROVIDE CORRECT AND COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF |
| | FORM. CORRECT ADDRESS IS 839 4TH STREET NOT 837 4TH |
| | STREET. PROVIDE OWNER'S NAME. PROVIDE BUILDER'S NAME. |
| | PERMITTING OFFICE IS WEST PALM BEACH NOT PALM BEACH. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | D)ITEM #8(A) ON PAGE 1 OF 4 SPECIFIES R-5 SLAB-ON-GRADE |
| | EDGE INSULATION. PLANS DON'T SPECIFY ANY SLAB EDGE |
| | INSULATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | E)ITEM #9(A) ON PAGE 1 OF 4 SPECIFIES R-4.5 EXTERIOR |
| | INSULATION ON CONCRETE BLOCK. PLANS DON'T SPECIFY |
| | EXTERIOR INSULATION ON THE CONCRETE BLOCK. THE |
| | INSULATION IS ON THE INTERIOR SIDE. SEE PLANS AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH, INCLUDING R-VALUE |
| | SPECIFIED. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | F)ITEM #10(A) ON PAGE 1 OF 4 SPECIFIES R-19 UNDER ATTIC |
| | INSULATION. THIS DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. SEE PLANS AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH, INCLUDING. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | G)ROOF MATERIAL SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 OF 4 NEEDS TO BE |
| | COORDINATED WITH PLANS. PLANS ARE NOT CLEAR ON WHAT |
| | ROOFING MATERIAL IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED BUT IT |
| | DOESN'T SPECIFY FLAT TILE OR SLATE. COORDINATE WITH |
| | ENGINEER PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | H)REVISE THE ATTIC VENT RATIO ON PAGE 2 OF 4. PLANS |
| | DON'T SHOW ANY 1/300 VENT RATIO. TYPICALLY, THE RATIO |
| | IS 1/150 NOT 1/300. SEC. R806.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. OR |
| | PERSON PREPARING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO PROVIDE |
| | COMPLETE DETAILS/SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE 1/300 RATIO AS REQUIRED BY THE EXCEPTION ON SEC. |
| | R806.2. NOTE: ENGINEER OF RECORD NEEDS TO |
| | REVIEW/APPROVE THEM PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | I)DOOR TYPE INFORMATION SPECIFIED ON PAGE 3 OF 4 IS |
| | INCORRECT. ACCORDING TO PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | SUBMITTED THE ENTRY DOOR AND THE BEDROOM #3 DOORS ARE |
| | ALUMINUM DOORS WITH GLAZING. GLASS IN THESE DOORS NEED |
| | TO BE INCLUDED ON THE GLASS CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. R405.5.3.1 AND SEC. R405.5.3.3 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | J)WINDOWS INFORMATION SPECIFIED ON 3 OF 4 DOESN'T MATCH |
| | PLANS. REVISE THE WINDOW AREA AND WINDOW OVERHANG DEPTH |
| | AND SEPARATION TO MATCH PLANS. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | K)FLOOR PLAN WAS REVISED. NEW ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED |
| | TO BE DONE BASED ON THE NEW FLOOR PLAN. COORDINATE ALL |
| | THE INFORMATION ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2-PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | FOLLOWING: |
| | R401.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | SEC. 107.2.5 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | SEC. 110.9 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3-SPECIFY ATTIC ACCESS SIZE AND LOCATION SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R807 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 4-PLANS SUBMITTED DON'T SPECIFY WHAT IS THE ROOFING |
| | MATERIAL. IS IT SHINGLES?, TILE?. IF USING SHINGLES , |
| | THEN A ROOF PITCH OF 2:12 TO LESS THAN 4:12 REQUIRES |
| | TWO LAYERS OF UNDERLAYMENT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R905.2.2 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS ON PLANS FOR |
| | THE TWO LAYERS OF UNDERLAYMENT. ALSO, PROVIDE |
| | SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FLAT ROOF. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PLANS SUBMITTED STILL DON'T SPECIFY THE ROOF PITCH. |
| | SPECIFY THE ROOF SLOPE ON ALL ROOF AREAS SHOWN ON THE |
| | REVISED PLANS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 5- OK. NO FLAT ROOFS ON REVISED PLANS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 6- BEAM SCHEDULE ON SHEET S-2 ONLY SPECIFIES B-1 BEAM. |
| | IT DOESN'T SPECIFY THE RAKE BEAM SHOWN ON SHEET S-4. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO CLARIFY. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS WERE REVISED. NEW FLOOR |
| | PLANS/ELEVATIONS WERE SUBMITTED BUT NONE OF THE |
| | STRUCTURAL PLANS WERE REVISED. REVISE ALL STRUCTURAL |
| | PLANS AND COORDINATE ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 7- PLANS DON'T PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ROOF |
| | SHEATHING. SPECIFY TYPE, THICKNESS AND ROOF SHEATHING |
| | FASTENING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R803.2.3.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 8- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR |
| | STEEL COLUMNS SHOWN ON THE FRONT PORCH. SPECIFY TOP AND |
| | BOTTOM CONNECTORS AND FURRING DETAILS. |
| | SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 9- PROVIDE DOORS AND WINDOWS STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL. |
| | NOTE: STRUCTURAL BUCK NEEDS TO PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT TO |
| | THE DOOR FRAME AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R609.7.2.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 10- REVISE THE ADDRESS INFORMATION ON ALL DRAWINGS, |
| | CALCULATIONS, ENERGY CALCULATIONS, ETC. SUBMITTED TO |
| | AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. THERE ARE TWO STRUCTURES IN |
| | THIS LOT. 839 4TH STREET IS THE ADDRESS FOR THE REAR |
| | STRUCTURE. THIS PERMIT APPLICATION IS FOR THE REAR |
| | STRUCTURE ONLY. 837 4TH STREET IS THE MAIN HOUSE. THIS |
| | WILL FACILITATE INSPECTIONS AND RECORDS KEEPING. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 11- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | 61G20-3.001 FOR |
| | |
| | A)ROOF MATERIAL FOR PITCHED ROOF AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NOA 19-0313.03 SUBMITTED IS FOR FLAT ROOFS OVER |
| | LIGHTWEIGHT CONCRETE DECKS. THIS IS INCORRECT. PROVIDE |
| | CORRECT SHINGLES PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | B)OK. REVISED PLANS DON'T SHOW FLAT ROOFS NOW. |
| | |
| | C)SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS A SPECIFIED ON REVISED PLANS. |
| | |
| | D)HARDIEBOARD SIDING. INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS NOT A |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL. NEED MIAMI DADE NOA OR COMPLETE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | NOTE: CLARIFY WHY SUBMITTING PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR |
| | HORIZONTAL SLIDER WINDOWS IF THEY ARE NOT SPECIFIED ON |
| | THE REVISED PLANS? |
| | |
| | 12- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | (INCLUDING THE HARDIEBOARD SIDING) AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS BASED ON REVISED PLANS. |
| | 13- SINGLE HUNG WINDOW SIZE SPECIFIED FOR BEDROOM #3 |
| | DOESN'T COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM CLEAR OPENING HEIGHT |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R310.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 14- PROVIDE COMPLETE WALL SECTION FROM FOUNDATION |
| | THROUGH ROOF AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.5.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 15- REVISED ELEVATIONS SHOW WHAT LOOKS LIKE CRAWL SPACE |
| | VENTILATION. PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS. NOTE: STRUCTURAL PLANS WERE NOT |
| | REVISED. IT IS NOT KNOW IF THE FLOOR IS GOING TO BE |
| | WOOD OR CONCRETE SLAB. |
| | CRAWL SPACE VENTILATION WITH FLOOR JOISTS NEED TO |
| | COMPLY WITH SEC. R409 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
