| Date |
Text |
| 2021-04-01 10:54:12 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | 3RD REVIEW: FBC SIXTH EDITION (2017) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | [ PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED ] |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) NOT RESOLVED. [ SUBMIT THE CALCULATIONS/DATA THAT |
| | WERE USED TO DETERMINE THE DESIGN PRESSURES. SPECIFY |
| | THE WALL ZONES THAT THE OPENINGS ARE LOCATED IN. THE |
| | ENGINEER'S LETTER REFERS TO A TRIPLE WINDOW AND NOA |
| | NO.20-0722.09. THE PERMIT APPLICATION ONLY INDICATES |
| | THAT (2) SGDS ARE BEING REPLACED. PLEASE CLARIFY.]THIS |
| | PROJECT IS LOCATED IN A HIGH RISE BUILDING. PLEASE |
| | SUBMIT DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED COMPONENT & CLADDING |
| | PRESSURES FOR THE TWO SLIDING GLASS DOORS FROM A |
| | FLORIDA LICENSED ENGINEER. THE WIND SPEED IS 170 MPH |
| | AND THE EXPOSURE CATEGORY IS D. FBC 107.2.1.2 |
| | |
| | 2) NOT RESOLVED. CIRCLE OR HI-LIGHT THE ITEMS IN THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT APPLY TO THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING |
| | THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE SPECIFIC DOORS THAT WILL |
| | BE INSTALLED. NOT: THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE DOORS |
| | MUST BE GREATER THAN THE COMPONENT AND CLADDING |
| | PRESSURES DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 3) PARTIALLY RESOLVED. [ THE WALL ZONES WERE NOT |
| | SPECIFIED.] SPECIFY THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING AND THE |
| | WALL ZONE THAT EACH OF THE DOORS IS LOCATED IN. FBC |
| | CHAPTER 16 |
| | |
| | 4) NEW COMMENT. SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER STATING HOW |
| | EACH REVIEW COMMENT HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
