| Date |
Text |
| 2021-01-11 16:37:54 | GUARDRAIL SUBMITTAL, THIRD BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | *****NOTE: |
| | ALL THE COMMENTS FROM FIRST REVIEW STILL APPLY. |
| | REQUESTED INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | ONLY THE ENGINEER GUARDRAIL CALCULATIONS WERE |
| | RESUBMITTED. THEY DON'T SEEM TO BE REVISED. SAME |
| | CALCULATIONS WERE RESUBMITTED. THE ONLY INFORMATION |
| | THAT WAS CHANGED WAS THE "CHECKED BY AND THE DATES. |
| | ALSO, IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY THE |
| | DATES WERE CHANGED AND NOW THEY SHOW AN EARLIER DATE |
| | THAN THE ONE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| | ENGINEER PROVIDING THE CALCULATIONS TO CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ENGINEERS/ARCHITECTS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS |
| | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN |
| | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS |
| | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO |
| | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY |
| | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, |
| | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, |
| | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, |
| | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER |
| | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL |
| | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH |
| | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, |
| | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE |
| | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: SEC. 702.6 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW WORK |
| | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MATERIALS AND METHODS |
| | REQUIREMENTS IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. |
| | |
| | 1- GUARDRAIL DRAWINGS WERE UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX AS A |
| | SINGLE PDF. ALL DRAWINGS NEED TO BE UPLOADED |
| | INDIVIDUALLY IN THE DRAWINGS FOLDER AS REQUIRED BY THE |
| | CITY GUIDE FOR DIGITAL PLAN REVIEW. ALSO, DRAWINGS NEED |
| | TO FOLLOW THE FILE NAMING GUIDELINES. SEE THE CITY |
| | QUICK START GUIDE: DIGITAL PLAN REVIEW. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT |
| | THIS. |
| | |
| | 2- SHEET F-1: |
| | A)REVISE THE APPLICABLE CODES. "THE ALUMINUM DESIGN |
| | MANUAL 2015" CAN NOT BE USED FOR THIS PROJECT. THE |
| | ALUMINUM DESIGN MANUAL IS NOT FOR GUARDRAILS. ALSO, |
| | THIS GUARDRAIL IS TO BE INSTALLED IN A PARKING GARAGE |
| | NOT IN A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING. THIS IS A VEHICLE |
| | BARRIER. ENGINEER NEEDS TO DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | SEC. 4.5.3 OF ASCE 7-10 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1607.8.3 |
| | FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). |
| | |
| | B) CURRENT CODE UNDER WHICH THE MASTER PERMIT WAS |
| | ISSUED IS THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SIXTH EDITION |
| | (2017) NOT FBC 2020. CHAPTER 553 F.S. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 3- SHEET F-2: |
| | A) REVISE THE DESIGN LOADS AND ALUMINUM NOTES. SEE ITEM |
| | #2 ABOVE. NEED TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 4.5.3 OF ASCE 7-10 |
| | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1607.8.3 FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). |
| | |
| | 4-REVISE SHEETS F-3 THRU F-7 TO COMPLY WITH SEC. 4.5.3 |
| | OF ASCE 7-10 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 1607.8.3 FBC 6TH |
| | EDITION (2017). |
| | |
| | 5- ENGINEER TO REVISE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | A) THIS GUARDRAIL IS TO BE INSTALLED IN A PARKING |
| | GARAGE NOT IN A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING (R-2). THIS IS A |
| | VEHICLE BARRIER. ENGINEER NEEDS TO DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH SEC. 4.5.3 OF ASCE 7-10 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 1607.8.3 FBC 6TH EDITION (2017). |
| | |
| | B) CURRENT CODE IS THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SIXTH |
| | EDITION (2017) NOT FBC 2020. |
| | CHAPTER 553 F.S. |
| | |
| | 6- REVISED DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS TO BE |
| | REVIEWED/APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD |
| | PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL T THIS OFFICE. SEC. 107.3.4 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 7- DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | |
| | FS471, DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED |
| | FOR PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED |
| | ORIGINALS. A SCAN OF A SIGNED PLAN IS NOT CONSIDERED AN |
| | ORIGINAL. THE PLANS UPLOADED HAVE AN IMAGE OF A |
| | SIGNATURE AND SEAL BUT ARE NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED. |
| | |
| | ALSO, THE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED DON'T HAVE THE |
| | ENGINEER'S SEA/SIGNATURE AND COMPLETE INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | EITHER UPLOAD TO PROJECTDOX DRAWINGS AND CALCULATIONS |
| | WITH DIGITAL SIGNATURE OR DROP OFF ORIGINAL SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED PAPER ORIGINALS WITH A WET SIGNATURE TO CITY |
| | HALL. |
| | |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE |
| | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF |
| | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR |
| | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL |
| | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR |
| | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
