| Date |
Text |
| 2020-12-21 11:43:14 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) UNFORTUNATLEY, ON REVIEW OF THE REVISED SUBMITTAL, |
| | THE PROPOSED INDICATES A DOOR SWINGING AGAINST EGRESS. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CH 39 EXIISTING BUSINESS OCCUPANCIES |
| | |
| | 39.2.2.2 DOORS. |
| | 39.2.2.2.1 DOORS COMPLYING WITH 7.2.1 SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED. |
| | |
| | |
| | 39.2.4 NUMBER OF MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| | 39.2.4.1 MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL OF THE |
| | FOLLOWING, |
| | EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY 39.2.4.2 THROUGH |
| | 39.2.4.6: |
| | (1) THE NUMBER OF MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL BE IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | 7.4.1.1 AND 7.4.1.3 THROUGH 7.4.1.6. |
| | (2) NOT LESS THAN TWO SEPARATE EXITS SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | ON EVERY |
| | STORY. |
| | (3) NOT LESS THAN TWO SEPARATE EXITS SHALL BE |
| | ACCESSIBLE FROM |
| | EVERY PART OF EVERY STORY. |
| | |
| | IT APPEARS THAT YOUR OCCCUPANCY DOESS NOT MEET THE |
| | SINGLE EXIT REQUIREMENTS AND THIS EXIT DOOR IS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | PER CH 7, MEANS OF EGRESS: |
| | |
| | 7.2.1.4.2 DOOR LEAF SWING DIRECTION. DOOR LEAVES |
| | REQUIRED TO BE |
| | OF THE SIDE-HINGED OR PIVOTED-SWINGING TYPE SHALL SWING |
| | IN THE |
| | DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL UNDER ANY OF THE FOLLOWING |
| | CONDITIONS: |
| | (1) WHERE SERVING A ROOM OR AREA WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD |
| | OF 50 OR |
| | MORE, EXCEPT UNDER ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: |
| | (A) DOOR LEAVES IN HORIZONTAL EXITS SHALL NOT BE |
| | REQUIRED TO |
| | SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL WHERE PERMITTED |
| | BY 7.2.4.3.8.1 OR 7.2.4.3.8.2. |
| | (B) DOOR LEAVES IN SMOKE BARRIERS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED |
| | TO |
| | SWING IN THE DIRECTION OF EGRESS TRAVEL IN EXISTING |
| | HEALTH |
| | CARE OCCUPANCIES, AS PROVIDED IN CHAPTER 19. |
| | (2) WHERE THE DOOR ASSEMBLY IS USED IN AN EXIT |
| | ENCLOSURE, UNLESS |
| | THE DOOR OPENING SERVES AN INDIVIDUAL LIVING UNIT THAT |
| | OPENS |
| | DIRECTLY INTO AN EXIT ENCLOSURE |
| | (3) WHERE THE DOOR OPENING SERVES A HIGH HAZARD |
| | CONTENTS AREA |
| | |
| | AS PER MY PREVIOUS COMMENT, THE DOOR CAN BE FULL SWING |
| | BUT IS REQUIRED TO SWING OUT INTO THE HALLWAY/CORRIDOR. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 1A) FYI - SHEET LS - 1, DOES NOT SHOW ANY CHANGE, |
| | |
| | PLEASE ENSURE THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN INDICATES THE |
| | APPLICABLE CHANGE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
