City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Notes

Notes

Date	Text
2021-03-01 11:14:51	SAMANTHA HILL
	BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
	[email protected]
	561-805-6724

	1. A NEW AFFIDAVIT WAS SUBMITTED, BUT DOES NOT REFER TO
	THE VERSION NUMBER FOR EACH PAGE AND DOES NOT REFER TO
	SHOP DRAWINGS, PRODUCT APPROVALS, ETC. (SEE PREVIOUS
	PRIVATE PROVIDER REVIEW). THE AFFIDAVIT ONLY LISTS PLAN
	PAGES AND SURVEY. AFFIDAVIT REFERS TO 16 PAGES, BU
	TTHERE ARE 17 PAGES IN THE PROJECTDOX UPLOAD AS WELL AS
	MANY SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. SOME PLANS WERE SUBMITTED
	THREE TIMES; NOT CLEAR WHICH OF THE VERSIONS WERE
	REVIEWED BY THE PRIVATE PROVIDER AS WE DID NOT GET A
	NEW AFFIDAVIT WITH VERSION NUMBERS FOR EACH REVIEW.

	FOR EXAMPLE:
	COVER SHEET A1 (WHICH INCLUDES WIND DESIGN CRITERIA,
	GENERAL NOTES, ETC.) IS DIGITALLY SIGNED 12/14/20. THIS
	WAS 2ND VERSION, NO SHOP DRAWING REVIEW BY UNIVERSAL
	ENGINEERING.
	SHEET A3 INCLUDES A SHOP DRAWING REVIEW, DIGITALLY
	SIGNED 11/8.
	SHEET E1 IS NOT DIGITALLY SIGNED, IS VERSION 3 DATED
	1/9/21, NO SHOP DRAWING REVIEW BY UNIVERSAL.

	IF AN AFFIDAVIT WAS PROVIDED EVERY CYCLE, OR SHOP
	DRAWING REVIEW WAS DONE EVERY CYCLE, THE VERSION
	REVIEWED WOULD BE CLEARER (BUT WOULD BE 100% CLEAR WITH
	EITHER A SHOP DRAWING REVIEW OR AN AFFIDAVIT REFERRING
	TO VERSION DATE). AS SUBMITED, I CANNOT DETERMINE WHICH
	SUBMITTALS WERE REVIEWED BY THE PRIVATE PROVIDER.
	REVIEW OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE
	BEEN DONE.