| Date |
Text |
| 2020-12-09 17:00:34 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) FOURTH BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS |
| | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN |
| | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS |
| | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO |
| | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY |
| | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, |
| | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, |
| | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, |
| | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER |
| | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL |
| | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH |
| | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, |
| | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE |
| | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: SEC. 702.6 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW WORK |
| | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MATERIALS AND METHODS |
| | REQUIREMENTS IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | COMMENTS TO DRAWING CVR SUBMITTED: |
| | 1)OK |
| | 2)OK |
| | |
| | 3) CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS ARE NOT CLEAR AND ARE |
| | INCOMPLETE: |
| | A)PROVIDE DETAIL SHOWING HOW ARE THE 2X4 STUDS |
| | INSTALLED UNDER THE EXISTING PRECAST CONCRETE DOUBLE |
| | TEE FLOORING AND SPECIFY FASTENER TYPE, SIZE AND |
| | SPACING. |
| | SEC. R703.1.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. DRAWING SUBMITTED STILL NO CLEAR AND |
| | DOESN'T PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR FASTENING OF P.T. |
| | 2X4"S TO THE PRECAST DOUBLE TEE FLOORING. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B)FASTENING OF THE PLYWOOD IS NOT CLEAR. WHERE ARE THE |
| | (2)3" TAPCONS PLACED. SPECIFY SPACING, ETC. COORDINATE |
| | WITH ITEM #3. ABOVE. |
| | SEC. R703.1.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. FASTENING OF THE PLYWOOD IS NOT CLEAR. |
| | SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLAN DON'T |
| | MATCH SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION |
| | AXONOMETRIC. CLEARLY SPECIFY FASTENER TYPE, SIZE AND |
| | SPACING. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | C) NEED TO SPECIFY 2 LAYERS OF WATER RESISTIVE BARRIERS |
| | AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R703.7.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. THERE ARE NO SPECIFICATIONS FOR 2 |
| | LAYERS OF WATER RESISTIVE BARRIERS. THERE IS A NOTE ON |
| | THE CONSTRUCTION AXONOMETRIC CALLING FOR "DOUBLE WIRE |
| | LATH". CLARIFY WHAT IS THIS. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | D)CONSTRUCTION AXONOMETRIC SHOWS "EXISTING RAILING TO |
| | REMAIN" ON THE UPPER ROOF. ACCORDING TO PHOTOS SHOWN ON |
| | SHEET CVR, THERE IS NOT RAILING ON THE ROOF. |
| | REVISE/CLARIFY AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | E)CONSTRUCTION AXONOMETRIC CALLS FOR "INSTALL A 3" PVC |
| | VENT. ACCORDING TO CONTRACTOR THERE IS NOT WORK ON THE |
| | SECOND FLOOR ROOF, EXCEPT FOR A MINOR REPAIR/PATCH. |
| | REVISE/CLARIFY AS REQUIRED. IF INSTALLING VENT , THEN |
| | CLEARLY SPECIFY SIZE AND LOCATION OF VENTS. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
