| Date |
Text |
| 2020-12-28 15:46:34 | FAILED |
| | |
| | PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS. NOTE: BY |
| | PROVIDING WRITTEN RESPONSES, YOU CAN VERIFY THAT YOU |
| | HAVE NOT FORGOTTEN TO ADDRESS A LISTED ITEM. |
| | |
| | SOUTH FACADE |
| | |
| | SIGN TYPE CL.1 - MAY BE A CANOPY SIGN |
| | SIGNS TYPE CL.2 IS FASCIA IDENTITY SIGNS |
| | |
| | 1) THE GROUP CALL HELD ON DECEMBER 15, 2020 OUTLINED |
| | THE ITEMS NECESSARY TO REVIEW THIS SIGN AS A CANOPY |
| | SIGN AND PERMIT THE PANEL BUILT ON TOP OF THE PATIO |
| | ROOF STRUCTURE TO REMAIN AS OPPOSED TO A PROHIBITED |
| | ROOF SIGN. |
| | |
| | A. THE ELEMENT OF THE ROOF STRUCTURE PROTRUDING PAST |
| | THE SUPPORT COLUMNS HAS TO MEET THE CANOPY REQUIREMENTS |
| | LISTED IN THE ROSEMARY SQUARE SIGN CRITERIA |
| | DEFINITIONS. |
| | |
| | SHEET 1.0 PROVIDES THE HEIGHT AND THE PROJECTION OF THE |
| | CANOPY PORTION OF THE ROOF STRUCTURE. THE HEIGHT FROM |
| | GRADE MEETS THE MINIMUM 10 FOOT REQUIREMENT; HOWEVER, |
| | THE PROJECTION OF THE CANOPY IS REQUIRED TO BE A |
| | MINIMUM OF EIGHT (8) FEET. THE DIMENSION PROVIDED ON |
| | THE PLAN IS FOR LESS THAN THE REQUIRED EIGHT (8) FEET. |
| | A PROJECTION OF FOUR (4) TO EIGHT (8) FEET REQUIRED |
| | ROSEMARY SQUARE TO PROVIDE WAIVER I WRITTEN APPROVAL. |
| | THIS APPROVAL WAS NOT PROVIDED WITH THE PERMIT |
| | RESUBMITTAL. NOTE: IT WAS STATED IN THE CALL THAT THE |
| | CANOPY PROJECTION WAS EIGHT (8) FEET. |
| | |
| | B. SHEET 0.3 CONTINUES TO SHOW THE LETTERS ATTACHED TO |
| | THE ROOFTOP PANEL, WHICH WOULD MAKE THIS A PROHIBITED |
| | ROOFTOP SIGN. ALL DRAWINGS NEED TO CLEARLY SHOW THAT |
| | THE LETTERS ARE NOT MOUNTED TO THE ROOFTOP PANEL. |
| | |
| | C. SHEET 4.0 WAS NOT UPDATED AND STILL SHOWS THE |
| | LETTERS MOUNTED TO THE ROOFTOP PANEL, WHICH IS A |
| | ROOFTOP SIGN AND THUS NOT PERMITTED. PROVIDE THE |
| | UPDATED SHEET 4.0 WHICH COMPLIES WITH THE PIN MOUNTED |
| | LETTERS ON A CANOPY AS DISCUSSED IN THE PHONE CALL. |
| | THIS SHEET MUST PROVIDE VERIFICATION OF THE ROSEMARY |
| | SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA, FOR EXAMPLE THAT ALL |
| | CONDUIT, RACEWAYS, WIRING, BALLAST BOXES, TRANSFORMERS, |
| | AND OTHER EQUIPMENT NECESSARY FOR SIGN CONNECTION SHALL |
| | BE CONCEALED. |
| | |
| | 2) THE DIMENSION OF WHAT CONSTITUTED SIGNS AND WHAT |
| | CONSTITUTED THE ARCHITECTURAL CLADDING OF THE BUILDING |
| | WAS DISCUSSED ON THE CALL. PICTURES WERE E-MAILED TO |
| | STAFF DURING THE MEETING TO SHOW THAT ALL OF THE |
| | FENESTRATED OPENINGS, NOT JUST THE ONES WITH THE SIGNS, |
| | INCLUDE THE ARCHITECTURAL CLADDING. COPIES OF THESE |
| | PHOTOS MUST BE INCLUDED WITH THE PERMIT RECORD. BASED |
| | ON THE DISCUSSION, STAFF HAS CALCULATED THAT THE CL.2 |
| | SIGNS ARE 2.3 SF IN AREA. |
| | |
| | 3) INCLUDE SHEET 6.0 THAT WAS INCLUDED IN THE PLANS |
| | E-MAILED TO STAFF AHEAD OF THE CALL WITH THE PERMIT |
| | UPLOAD. THIS PLAN VERIFIES COMPLIANCE OF CL.2 WITH THE |
| | ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIREMENT THAT |
| | ALL CONDUIT, RACEWAYS, WIRING, BALLAST BOXES, |
| | TRANSFORMERS, AND OTHER EQUIPMENT NECESSARY FOR SIGN |
| | CONNECTION SHALL BE CONCEALED. |
| | |
| | 4) THE "LUCID" SIGN THAT IS SHOWN ON THE BUILD OUT |
| | PLANS MOUNTED ON TO THE INTERIOR WALL BUT VISIBLE ON |
| | THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING IS REQUIRED TO COUNT |
| | TOWARD MEETING THE SIGN SQUARE FOOTAGE ALLOWANCE. WHILE |
| | THE PLAN SET E-MAILED TO STAFF IN ADVANCE OF THE CALL |
| | INCLUDED THIS INFORMATION ON SHEET 3.0, IT HAS NOT BEEN |
| | PROVIDED WITH THE PERMIT UPLOAD. THIS SHEET NEEDS TO BE |
| | UPLOADED FOR THE PERMIT RECORD. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE |
| | INFORMATION PROVIDED ON SHEET 3.0, AND THE SIGN APPEARS |
| | TO CONTAIN, THIS SIGN MAY BE A MAXIMUM OF 31.6 SQUARE |
| | FEET IN AREA. |
| | |
| | PERMITTED: 132.3 SF |
| | PROPOSED CL.1: 16.7 SF |
| | PROPOSED EASTERN CL.2: 2.3 SF |
| | PROPOSED WESTERN CL.2: 2.3 SF |
| | TOTAL EXTERIOR: 21.3 SF |
| | INTERIOR VISIBLE WALL SIGN: VERIFIED WITH UPLOADED |
| | SHEET 3.0 ? 2.3 SF |
| | |
| | TOTAL SIGNAGE ON SOUTH FACADE: 23.6 |
| | |
| | WEST FACADE |
| | |
| | SIGN CL.2 IS A FASCIA IDENTITY SIGN |
| | |
| | 1) THE ROSEMARY SQUARE SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE ONLY |
| | PERMIT FASCIA IDENTITY SIGNS ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS, |
| | WHICH IS A WAIVER 1. A WAIVER I REQUIRES WRITTEN |
| | APPROVAL FROM CITYPLACE RETAIL. NOTE: WAIVER I LETTER |
| | DID NOT ADDRESS THE SIGN ON THE ROSEMARY AVENUE FACSIA. |
| | |
| | 2) THE DIMENSION OF WHAT CONSTITUTED SIGNS AND WHAT |
| | CONSTITUTED THE ARCHITECTURAL CLADDING OF THE BUILDING |
| | WAS DISCUSSED IN THE MEETING. PICTURES WERE E-MAILED TO |
| | STAFF DURING THE MEETING TO SHOW THAT ALL OF THE |
| | FENESTRATED OPENINGS, NOT JUST THE ONES WITH THE SIGNS, |
| | INCLUDE THE ARCHITECTURAL CLADDING. COPIES OF THESE |
| | PHOTOS MUST BE INCLUDED WITH THE PERMIT RECORD. BASED |
| | ON THE DISCUSSION, STAFF HAS CALCULATED THAT THE SIGN |
| | IS 2.3 SF IN AREA. |
| | |
| | PERMITTED: 21.25 SF |
| | PROPOSED CL.2: 2.3 SF |
| | |
| | ******** THE SIGN INSIDE THE GARAGE IS NOT ON THIS |
| | PARCEL AND MUST HAVE A SEPARATE SIGN PERMIT (WITH |
| | ELECTRICAL) UPLOADED. THE UPLOAD NEEDS TO INCLUDE ALL |
| | THE PLANS THAT THE STRUCTURAL AND ELECTRICAL REVIEWERS |
| | NEED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE BUILDING AND |
| | ELECTRIC CODES. THIS SIGN PERMIT DOES NOT GET ZONING |
| | REVIEW SINCE IT IS INSIDE OF THE BUILDING AND NOT |
| | VISIBLE TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. ******** |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
