| Date |
Text |
| 2020-09-17 12:38:27 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE PROVIDED IN AN EFFORT TO |
| | REDUCE FALSE/NUISANCE ALARMS AND NON-REQUIRED DEVICES: |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) THERE ARE TWO SD IN THE STORAGE ROOM. |
| | |
| | 9.6.2.9 WHERE A TOTAL (COMPLETE) COVERAGE SMOKE |
| | DETECTION |
| | SYSTEM IS REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION OF THIS CODE, |
| | AUTOMATIC |
| | DETECTION OF SMOKE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 72, NATIONAL |
| | FIRE |
| | ALARM AND SIGNALING CODE, SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ALL |
| | OCCUPIABLE |
| | AREAS IN ENVIRONMENTS THAT ARE SUITABLE FOR PROPER |
| | SMOKE DETECTOR |
| | OPERATION. |
| | |
| | COMPLETE SD COVERAGE IS NOT REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE ELIMINATE THE ONE IN THE CENTER. |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) THERE IS A SD IN THE CUST. CLOSET. |
| | |
| | I DON'T BELIEVE ONE IS REQUIRED IN THIS ROOM AS LONG AS |
| | THERE IS A FIRE SPRINKLER LOCATED IN THE ROOOM AND THE |
| | SD WOULD NOT BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | AS THIS APPAERS TO BE A SMALL ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY WITH |
| | INCIDENTAL OTHER OCCUPANCIES, A SD IS NOT REQUIRED |
| | |
| | 9.6.2.9 WHERE A TOTAL (COMPLETE) COVERAGE SMOKE |
| | DETECTION |
| | SYSTEM IS REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION OF THIS CODE, |
| | AUTOMATIC |
| | DETECTION OF SMOKE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 72, NATIONAL |
| | FIRE |
| | ALARM AND SIGNALING CODE, SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ALL |
| | OCCUPIABLE |
| | AREAS IN ENVIRONMENTS THAT ARE SUITABLE FOR PROPER |
| | SMOKE DETECTOR |
| | OPERATION. |
| | |
| | 12.3.4.2.3* IN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES WITH OCCUPANT LOADS |
| | OF MORE |
| | THAN 300, AUTOMATIC DETECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ALL |
| | HAZARDOUS |
| | AREAS THAT ARE NOT NORMALLY OCCUPIED, UNLESS SUCH AREAS |
| | ARE |
| | PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN APPROVED, SUPERVISED |
| | AUTOMATIC |
| | SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.7. |
| | |
| | COMPLETE SD COVERAGE IS NOT REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) THERE ARE INDICATIONS OF 3 PULL STATIONS AT 3 EXIT |
| | DOORS. |
| | |
| | I UNDERSTAND THE CODE THAT SAYS THERE SHALL BE PS AT |
| | EACH EXIT; HOWEVER, THERE IS A PROVISION FOR REDUCTION |
| | OF PS. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101 CH 9 |
| | |
| | 9.6.2.6* FOR FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS USING AUTOMATIC FIRE |
| | DETECTION OR |
| | WATERFLOW DETECTION DEVICES TO INITIATE THE FIRE ALARM |
| | SYSTEM IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTERS 11 THROUGH 43, NOT LESS THAN |
| | ONE MANUAL |
| | FIRE ALARM BOX, LOCATED AS REQUIRED BY THE AUTHORITY |
| | HAVING |
| | JURISDICTION, SHALL BE PROVIDED TO INITIATE A FIRE |
| | ALARM SIGNAL. |
| | |
| | PLEASE ELIMINATE THE 2 PULL STATIONS IN THE WORK-OUT |
| | AREA. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) THERE IS A INDICATION OF A HORN STROBE IN THE |
| | STORAGE ROOM. |
| | |
| | AS THIS ROOM IS SMALL AND NOT NORMALLY OCCUPIABLE AND |
| | TWO HORN STROBES ARE LOCATED IN THE ROOM DIRECTLY |
| | ADJACENT TO THE STORAGE ROOM A HORN STROBE IS NOT |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 5) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 6) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
