| Date |
Text |
| 2020-10-06 08:09:27 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW: FBC SIXTH EDITION (2017) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) THE ANCHOR SPACING TABLE IN THE CORRUGATED PANEL |
| | SCHEDULE ON PAGE 2 OF 10 ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR |
| | THE CLEAR PANELS HAS THE SPANS AND PRESSURES FOR 13" |
| | SPACING. I DO NOT SEE ANYTHING THAT ALLOWS HIGHER |
| | PRESSURES FOR CLOSER ANCHOR SPACING. BASED ON THE TABLE |
| | THE PANELS WITH THE 108" SPAN ARE ONLY GOOD FOR 35 PSF |
| | AND THE PANELS SPANNING 128" ARE ONLY GOOD FOR 30 PSF. |
| | THESE PRESSURES ARE TOO LOW FOR THESE OPENINGS. FBC |
| | 107.2.1 & FBC-R301.2.1.2 |
| | |
| | PER YOUR INSTALLATION SCHEDULE OPENINGS #9 AND 10 HAVE |
| | A PANEL SPAN 116" AND OPENING #27 HAS A PANEL SPAN OF |
| | 128". THE TABLE FOR THE CLEAR CORRUGATED PANELS ON PAGE |
| | 2 OF 10 OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL HAS PRESSURES OF LESS |
| | THAN THE 50 PSF THAT IS REQUIRED PER YOUR INSTALLATION |
| | SCHEDULE. SINCE THESE DO NOT MEET THE REQUIRED |
| | PRESSURES THEY CAN NOT BE APPROVED FOR THIS PROJECT. |
| | OPENINGS #7 WITH THE 91" SPAN AND #18 WITH THE 82" SPAN |
| | BOTH HAVE PRESSURES OF MORE THAN 50 PSF AND ARE |
| | ACCEPTABLE. THE ANCHOR SPACING IS 13" O.C. PER THE |
| | TABLE ON PAGE 2 OF 10. YOU CAN NOT USE ANY OTHER |
| | SPACING WITHOUT SIGNED AND SEALED CALCULATIONS FROM AN |
| | ENGINEER. |
| | |
| | 2) PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER EXPLAINING HOW |
| | THESE COMMENTS WILL BE ADDRESSED. |
