| Date |
Text |
| 2020-10-16 10:02:39 | GENERAL COMMENTS: |
| | 1. SATISFIED. |
| | 2. SATISFIED. |
| | 3. SATISFIED. |
| | 4. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: REMOVE ALL NON-APPLICABLE |
| | LINEAR PARK PLANS AND ONLY SHOW WHAT WILL BE |
| | CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THIS PARENT SITE. PLEASE |
| | ILLUSTRATED PROPOSED EDGE OF CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND |
| | PAVERS ALONG TAMARIND (REMOVE PORTION THAT WOULD BE |
| | BUILT WITH LINEAR PARK FOR THIS PERMIT SET) ? IN THE |
| | CASE THE LINEAR PARK IS NOT BUILT, NEED TO SEE HOW THIS |
| | WILL TRANSITION FROM PROPOSED SIDEWALK TO EXISTING |
| | SIDEWALK ON TAMARIND AVENUE. ONLY SHOW PROPOSED |
| | HARDSCAPE THAT WILL BE BUILT AS PART OF THIS PARENT |
| | SITE (ADJUST ON CIVIL PLANS, SITE PLAN, HARDSCAPE PLAN, |
| | ARCHITECTURAL, ETC.). ONLY INCLUDE INGROUND LIGHT |
| | ADJACENT TO PARK IF IT WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF |
| | THIS PARENT SITE ? WILL NEED TO CONFIRM WITH |
| | ENGINEERING ABOUT WHAT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS WITHIN THE |
| | ROW |
| | CONTINUE TO WORK WITH WHITING TURNER AND CRA ON |
| | TAMARIND AVENUE PLANS AND SUBMIT A PERMIT REVISION WHEN |
| | THE PLANS FOR THE LANDSCAPE/HARDSCAPE/CURBING ARE |
| | FINALIZED FOR THIS SECTION OF TAMARIND AVENUE. |
| | 5. CONIDTION OF APPROVAL: WHERE IS BUS SHELTER BEING |
| | RELOCATED TO? PLEASE INDICATE ON ALL APPLICABLE PLANS. |
| | LOCATION NEEDS TO BE SHOWN. EXACT DETAILS CAN BE SHOWN |
| | THROUGH EXHIBIT OR THROUGH SEPARATE PERMIT |
| | BUS SHELTER DETAILS TO BE REVIEWED THROUGH SEPARATE |
| | PERMIT PRIOR TO TCO. COLUMNS FOR SHELTER CANNOT BE |
| | PLACED IN FIVE-FOOT-WIDE SIDEWALK IN ROW |
| | 6. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: INDICATE WHICH HARDSCAPE AND |
| | LANDSCAPE PORTIONS ARE PART OF THE BANYAN BLVD |
| | STREETSCAPE PROJECT ON ALL APPLICABLE PLANS (HARDSCAPE, |
| | LANDSCAPE, SITE, ETC.) |
| | ANY PORTION OF IMPROVEMENTS ALONG BANYAN BOULEVARD THAT |
| | ARE OUTSIDE THE ROW OR OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF THE BANYAN |
| | BOULEVARD STREETSCAPE SHALL BE DONE BY THE DEVELOPER |
| | AND AT THE EXPENSE OF THE DEVELOPER |
| | 7. SATISFIED. |
| | 8. SATISFIED |
| | 9. SATISFIED |
| | 10. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: WHERE ARE THE STREET LIGHTS |
| | PROPOSED ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE? PLEASE INDICATE IN |
| | LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THIS PERMIT AND LANDSCAPE PERMIT. |
| | WILL BE NEEDED FOR FUTURE REFERENCE FOR PHOTOMETRIC |
| | PLAN FOR LIGHT POLES ALONG THIS STREET |
| | PHOTOMETRICS AND SPECS TO BE REVIEWED THROUGH SEPARATE |
| | PHOTOMETRIC PERMIT AND/OR AS PART OF TAMARIND AVENUE |
| | STREETSCAPE PLANS. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH TAMARIND AVE |
| | CONTRACTOR |
| | 11. SATISFIED. |
| | 12. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: PUBLIC ACCESS FOR RETAIL |
| | PARKING SPACES REQUIRED. HOW IS THIS BEING |
| | ACCOMPLISHED? PLEASE ADDRESS SOMEWHERE ON SITE PLAN |
| | ACCESS NEEDS TO BE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC THROUGH PARKING |
| | GARAGE GATE. THESE SPACES WILL NEED TO BE RESERVED FOR |
| | THE COMMERCIAL USE WITHIN THE PARKING GARAGE |
| | 13. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: A PEDESTRIAN WARNING SIGNAL |
| | AT PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE/EXIT IS REQUIRED AS PART OF |
| | THE DAC FINAL APPROVAL. PLEASE INDICATE PROPOSED |
| | LOCATION ON SITE PLAN |
| | STAFF UNDERSTANDS THE MISCOMMUNICATION WITH THIS |
| | COMMENT THAT THE APPLICANT PLACED TRUNCATED DOMES NEAR |
| | THE ENTRANCE. STAFF CLARIFIED COMMENT TO WGI AND TO |
| | DEVELOPER ? REQUESTING INCLUSION OF WARNING SIGN ON |
| | BUILDING THAT ALERTS PEDESTRIANS THAT CAR IS COMING. |
| | CAN BE SUBMITTED THROUGH SEPARATE PERMIT. SEE NEW |
| | COMMENT #47 REGARDING TRUNCATED DOME |
| | 14. NOT SATISFIED: CONSTRUCTION SITE MAINTENANCE PLAN |
| | IS REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL BY CITY OF WP PD CPTED |
| | OFFICIAL. PLEASE EMAIL OFFICER SETH BUXTON |
| | ([email protected]) AND CC LIZ ([email protected]) |
| | NEEDS TO BE DONE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION START |
| | LANDSCAPE: |
| | 15. SATISFIED. |
| | 16. SATISFIED. |
| | 17. SATISFIED. |
| | 18. CONIDTION OF APPROVAL: PLANTER BED COULD BE |
| | PROVIDED IN CENTER OF SIDEWALK BETWEEN FOUNDATION |
| | LANDSCAPE AND CURB AT PROJECT?S SOUTHWEST CORNER. A |
| | FOUR-FOOT-WIDE PLANTER BOX WOULD STILL PERMIT A 9-FOOT |
| | SIDEWALK BETWEEN THE BED AND CURB AND PROVIDE FOR |
| | ENHANCE SHADE BY SHIFTING ONE OF THE FOUNDATION TREES |
| | OVER - BETTER MEETING THE INTENDED REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | DMP STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS ? CONTACT LIZ FOR MORE |
| | INFORMATION AND DISCUSSION |
| | TAMARIND AVENUE PLANS DISCUSSION ONGOING BETWEEN |
| | ZONING, CRA, DEVELOPER AND TAMARIND AVE CONTRACTOR |
| | 19. CONDITION OF APPROVAL: STAFF RECOMMENDS INCLUDING |
| | SKATEBOARDING DETERRENT ON BENCHES |
| | RECOMMENDATION IN COA |
| | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS: |
| | 20. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE GROUND FLOOR DETAIL |
| | NOT ROOF DETAIL ON SITE PLAN SHEET A-1.00 |
| | 21. SATISFIED. |
| | 22. SATISFIED. |
| | 23. NOT SATISFIED. TURN AROUND SPACE REQUIRED AT END OF |
| | DEAD END DRIVE AISLE ON GROUND FLOOR AND 2ND FLOOR |
| | (ENTIRE PARKING SPACE TO BE STRIPED THROUGH AND |
| | DEDICATED FOR TURNAROUND) |
| | 2ND FLOOR SHEET A-2.01 DOES NOT INDICATE TURN AROUND |
| | SPACE ALTHOUGH COMMENT RESPOND MEMO INDICATES THAT THIS |
| | WAS DONE. IF ALL OF THE SPACES ON THE 2ND FLOOR ARE |
| | RESERVED FOR INDIVIDUAL UNITS, A TURNAROUND SPACE NOT |
| | REQUIRED, BUT OTHERWISE IT WILL BE |
| | 24. NOT SATISFIED. THREE ROWS OF TANDEM PARKING ON |
| | SECOND FLOOR NEEDS TO BE REDUCED TO COMPACT SIZE SPACES |
| | (16? LONG, NOT 18?) PER CONDITION OF SITE PLAN |
| | APPROVAL. PLEASE LABEL THESE AS COMPACT. |
| | COMMENT RESPONSE MEMO INDICATES THAT THESE WERE |
| | LABELED, BUT THEY ARE NOT ON THE 2ND FLOOR PLAN |
| | 25. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE NUMBER OF COMPACT |
| | SPACES IN PARKING DATA AND PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL SPACES |
| | THERE ARE SIX COMPACT TANDEM SPACES, NOT 3 (COUNTED AS |
| | INDIVIDUAL SPACES TOWARDS PROVIDED PARKING). PLEASE |
| | UPDATE. |
| | 26. NOT SATISFIED. BUILDING ADDRESS IDENTIFICATION |
| | SIGNAGE DOES NOT NEED A SEPARATE PERMIT (ALL OTHER |
| | SIGNS DO) ? CAN REMOVE SECOND SENTENCE FROM NOTE 54 ON |
| | SHEET A-3.00 |
| | SECOND SENTENCE STILL REMAINS |
| | 27. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. PLEASE INCLUDE GLAZING |
| | DETAIL AND SAMPLE IMAGES FOR ALL GROUND FLOOR AND |
| | SECOND FLOOR WINDOW TYPES |
| | STAFF UNDERSTANDS THAT THE WINDOWS MAY NOT YET HAVE |
| | BEEN CHOSEN. PLEASE NOTE THAT GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS |
| | SHALL BE LIGHT TINTED TO PERMIT INTERACTION WITH THE |
| | EXTERIOR TO MEET TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENTS |
| | 28. SATISFIED. |
| | 29. SATISFIED. |
| | 30. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SAMPLE IMAGE OF |
| | ALUMINUM MESH PRIVACY PARTITION DIVIDER (NOTE 24 ON |
| | SHEET A-3.01) |
| | REQUESTING ADDITIONAL MATERIAL INFORMATION. SEE NEW |
| | COMMENT #51 |
| | 31. SATISFIED |
| | 32. SATISFIED |
| | 33. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PARKING QUANTITY PER FLOOR |
| | TABLE ON SHEET A-0.02 LISTS REQUIRED PARKING FOR TYPE A |
| | UNITS AS 1/13 UNIT. REQUIRED PARKING FOR MICROUNITS IS |
| | 0.5/UNIT. PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY, KEEPING COMMENT #3 |
| | IN MIND AS THE CALCULATIONS ARE REDONE. PARKING |
| | QUANTITY PER FLOOR TABLE DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR CAR SHARE |
| | SPACES ? PLEASE INCLUDE. |
| | SEE NEW COMMENT #52 |
| | CIVIL: |
| | 34. SATISFIED. |
| | 35. NOT SATISFIED. CIVIL PLANS INDICATE TWO EXISTING |
| | SEWER MANHOLES AND ONE TM MANHOLE AT PROJECT?S |
| | NORTHWEST CORNER, BUT ONLY SEE TWO MANHOLES ON SITE. |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY |
| | TWO MANHOLES STILL REMAIN ON CIVIL PLANS |
| | 36. SATISFIED. |
| | 37. SATISFIED. |
| | 38. NOT SATISFIED. SWMH 5359 DOES NOT APPEAR ON SITE OR |
| | ON SURVEY ? PLEASE CLARIFY ON CIVIL PLANS. |
| | LABEL STILL REMAINS ON CIVIL PLANS |
| | 39. SATISFIED. |
| | 40. SATISFIED. |
| | 41. SATISFIED. |
| | 42. SATISFIED. |
| | 43. SATISFIED. |
| | 44. SATISFIED. |
| | 45. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. PLEASE INCLUDE CROSS SECTION |
| | THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO BANYAN BOULEVARD AT THE PARKING |
| | GARAGE ENTRANCE ? CLEARLY SHOWING THE SIDEWALK |
| | ELEVATION FROM THE EAST TO WEST SIDE OF THE PARKING |
| | GARAGE WALLS (SECTION SHOULD EXTEND BEYOND WALLS TO |
| | SHOW CLEAR PICTURE) |
| | SEE NEW COMMENT #47 |
| | 46. CONDITION OF APPROVAL. PLEASE NOTE ? APPLICANT IS |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG |
| | TAMARIND AVENUE THAT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE OF |
| | THE BANYAN STREETSCAPE PROJECT. THIS INCLUDES |
| | CONTINUATION OF THE CURB LINE ALONG TAMARIND. THIS WILL |
| | NEED TO BE REFLECTED ON ALL PLANS INCLUDING ENGINEERING |
| | PERMIT PLANS. APPEARS THAT NO NEW CURB HAS BEEN |
| | PROPOSED BEYOND WHAT IS BEING INCLUDED WITH BANYAN |
| | STREETSCAPE DESIGN |
| | COORDINATION FOR TAMARIND STREETSCAPE PLANS ONGOING |
| | NEW COMMENTS OCTOBER 14, 2020: |
| | 47. PLEASE CLARIFY WITH CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING IF |
| | TRUNCATED DOME AT ENTRANCE OF PARKING GARAGE IS NEEDED |
| | OR ACCEPTABLE. SUBMIT PERMIT REVISION TO ENGINEERING |
| | AND BUILDING PERMIT PLANS PRIOR TO TCO SHOWING THIS |
| | 48. PARKING CALCULATIONS ON SHEET A-2.00 INCORRECT. |
| | LISTS 25 TANDEM SPACES (24 IS CORRECT) AND 3 TANDEM |
| | COMPACT (SHOULD BE 6). SHEET A-1.00 SITE PLAN IS ALSO |
| | INCORRECT FOR TANDEM SPACES. SHOULD BE 45 STANDARD |
| | (INCLUDING 7 ADA), 6 COMPACT TANDEM, 24 STANDARD |
| | TANDEM. THE PERCENTAGE FOR COMPACT SPACES WOULD BE 8%. |
| | PLEASE MAKE SURE ALL SITE DATA TABLES ARE MATCHING AND |
| | CONSISTENT INCLUDING FOR BIKE PARKING, PARKING, GBA, |
| | AND OTHER ZONING REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE |
| | BIKE RACKS REQUIRED ALONG THE PUBLIC ROW SHOULD BE |
| | INCLUDED AS REQUIRED BIKE PARKING. |
| | 49. PLEASE LABEL PARKING SPACES RESERVED FOR RETAIL, |
| | GUEST, AND CAR SHARE. THESE WERE LABELED ON THE WGI |
| | SITE PLAN DURING SITE PLAN REVIEW BUT ARE NOT ON THE |
| | NEW SITE PLAN OR ARCHITECTURAL PLANS |
| | 50. DEVELOPER HAS INDICATED THAT RAILING DESIGN MIGHT |
| | CHANGE. IF THIS IS CORRECT, PLEASE UPDATE DETAIL AND |
| | ENSURE THAT BALCONY DIVIDER IS ARCHITECTURALLY |
| | CONSISTENT |
| | 51. BICYCLE RACKS ON CIVIL PLANS ARE INCORRECT, PLEASE |
| | COORDINATE WITH HARDSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS |
| | PROPOSED PROVISOS: |
| | 1. ALL ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED TO THE |
| | HEIGHT OF THE EQUIPMENT. ALL WALL MOUNTED EQUIPMENT |
| | SHALL BE ARCHITECTURALLY SCREENED OR PAINTED TO MATCH |
| | BUILDING FA?ADE. SUBJECT TO ZONING INSPECTION AT TIME |
| | OF TCO AND CO |
| | 2. SEPARATE PERMIT REQUIRED FOR ALL SIGNAGE, FOR |
| | PHOTOMETRICS, LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND BUS SHELTER |
| | (IF EXACT DETAILS NOT INCLUDED ON THIS PERMIT). |
| | 3. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT SHALL BE RECORDED BETWEEN THE |
| | DEVELOPER AND CITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPE AND |
| | HARDSCAPE WITHIN CITY ROW. THIS SHALL INCLUDE THE |
| | LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION IN THE MEDIAN IN BANYAN |
| | BOULEVARD |
| | 4. THE PROPERTY SHALL BE REPLATTED PRIOR TO CO. A |
| | PERPETUAL ACCESS AGREEMENT SHALL BE RECORDED AS PART OF |
| | THE REPLAT OR THROUGH A SEPARATE INSTRUMENT |
| | 5. PERMIT REVISION SHALL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO TCO TO |
| | ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TAMARIND AVENUE PLANS ONCE |
| | COORDINATION EFFORTS WITH CITY, WHITING TURNER AND |
| | APPLICANT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. |
| | 6. PERMIT REVISION SHALL BE REQUIRED IF RAILING DESIGN |
| | OR OTHER ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES ARE MODIFIED |
| | 7. APPROVED MINOR SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL FOR AS-BUILTS |
| | REQUIRED PRIOR TO CO |
| | 8. BUS SHELTER DETAILS TO BE REVIEWED THROUGH SEPARATE |
| | PERMIT AND APPROVED PRIOR TO TCO. COLUMNS CANNOT BE |
| | LOCATED IN MINIMUM FIVE FOOT SIDEWALK ON ROW |
| | 9. ANY PORTION OF IMPROVEMENTS ALONG BANYAN BOULEVARD |
| | THAT ARE OUTSIDE THE ROW OR OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF THE |
| | BANYAN BOULEVARD STREETSCAPE SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE |
| | DEVELOPER AND AT THE EXPENSE OF THE DEVELOPER |
| | 10. THE PUBLIC SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO THE RETAIL PARKING |
| | SPACES THROUGH THE PARKING GARAGE GATE. IF SPACE IS |
| | UTILIZED FOR OFFICE SPACE, TENANTS SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO |
| | THE 6 PARKING SPACES |
| | 11. ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE SCREENED WITH |
| | LANDSCAPE TO BEST EXTENT POSSIBLE |
| | 12. ANY MODIFICATIONS TO PLACEMENT OF ABOVE GROUND |
| | UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH ZONING AS WELL AS |
| | OTHER APPLICABLE DEPARTMENTS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION |
| | 13. RECOMMENDING TO INCLUDE SKATEBOARD DETERRENT ON |
| | BENCHES |
| | 14. GROUND FLOOR WINDOWS SHALL BE LIGHT TINTED TO |
| | PERMIT INTERACTION WITH THE EXTERIOR TO MEET |
| | TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENTS |
| | 15. PARKING SPACES FOR GUESTS, THE COMMERCIAL SPACE AND |
| | THE CAR SHARE SPACES SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED WITHIN |
| | THE PARKING GARAGE THROUGH SIGNAGE OR OTHER MEANS |
| | 16. THE SIDEWALK CONNECTIONS FROM THE TWO NORTH DOORS |
| | (FOR FIRE EGRESS) ARE SHOWN FOR THE PURPOSE OF MEETING |
| | FIRE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. THESE SHOULD NOT BE REQUIRED |
| | IF THE LINEAR PARK IS CONSTRUCTED AT THE SAME TIME AS |
| | FLAGLER STATION. THIS SHALL BE CONFIRMED BY THE FIRE |
| | CHIEF THROUGH THE APPROVAL FOR THE LINEAR PARK AND |
| | PRIOR TO CO |
| | 17. PER DAC CONDITION OF APPROVAL, A WARNING SIGN SHALL |
| | BE INCLUDED AT THE PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE INDICATING |
| | TO PEDESTRIANS THAT A CAR IS APPROACHING |
| | |
| | |
| | LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER |
| | 561 822 1426 |
| | [email protected] |
