| Date |
Text |
| 2020-08-12 12:46:01 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET A 1.0 - THERE ARE INDICATIONS OF EXISTING EXIT |
| | DOORS LEADING OUT INTO THE NEW PATION; HOWEVER, THERE |
| | ARE ONLY TWO EXIT DOORS FROM THE NEW PATIO. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CH 7 MEANS OF EGRESS |
| | |
| | 7.3.1 OCCUPANT LOAD. |
| | 7.3.1.1 SUFFICIENT CAPACITY. |
| | 7.3.1.1.1 THE TOTAL CAPACITY OF THE MEANS OF EGRESS FOR |
| | ANY STORY, |
| | BALCONY, TIER, OR OTHER OCCUPIED SPACE SHALL BE |
| | SUFFICIENT FOR THE |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD THEREOF |
| | |
| | 7.3.1.1.2 FOR OTHER THAN EXISTING MEANS OF EGRESS, |
| | WHERE MORE |
| | THAN ONE MEANS OF EGRESS IS REQUIRED, THE MEANS OF |
| | EGRESS SHALL BE |
| | OF SUCH WIDTH AND CAPACITY THAT THE LOSS OF ANY ONE |
| | MEANS OF |
| | EGRESS LEAVES AVAILABLE NOT LESS THAN 50 PERCENT OF THE |
| | REQUIRED |
| | CAPACITY. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A REVIEW OF THE EXISTING OCCUPANCY EGESS |
| | LOADS AND NEW OCCUPANCY LOADS AND INDICATE THAT THAT |
| | THESE TWO NEW PATIO DOORS PROVIDE THE REQUIRED EGRESS |
| | WIDTH FROM THE EXISITNG BUILDING AS WELL AS THE |
| | INCREASE OF THE NEW PATIO. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1A) SHEET A 1.0 - THERE IS AN INDICATION OF A STAIRWAY |
| | LEADING DOWN FROM A SINGLE PATIO DOOR. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CH 7 |
| | |
| | 7.3.3* EGRESS CAPACITY. |
| | 7.3.3.1 EGRESS CAPACITY FOR APPROVED COMPONENTS OF |
| | MEANS OF |
| | EGRESS SHALL BE BASED ON THE CAPACITY FACTORS SHOWN IN |
| | TABLE |
| | 7.3.3.1, UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN 7.3.3.2. |
| | |
| | PER THE SAME INFORMATION OF THE ABOVE COMMENT, PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE DETAILS THAT THIS STAIRWAY MEETS THE EGRESS |
| | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE COMBINED OCCUPANCY TOTALS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) THERE ARE NO INDICATIONS OF AN EXISTING FIRE |
| | SPRINKLER OR FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. WITH THE CREATION OF |
| | THIS NEW OCCUPIABLE INDOOR SPACE, THE LIFE SAFETY |
| | SYSTEMS SHALL BE EXTENDED. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CH 4 |
| | |
| | 4.6.7 BUILDING REHABILITATION. |
| | 4.6.7.1 REHABILITATION WORK ON EXISTING BUILDINGS SHALL |
| | BE |
| | CLASSIFIED AS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING WORK CATEGORIES IN |
| | ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH 43.2.2.1: |
| | (1) REPAIR |
| | (2) RENOVATION |
| | (3) MODIFICATION |
| | (4) RECONSTRUCTION |
| | (5) CHANGE OF USE OR OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION |
| | (6) ADDITION |
| | |
| | 43.8.3 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS. IN OTHER THAN ONE- AND |
| | TWOFAMILY |
| | DWELLINGS, EXISTING COMPARTMENT AREAS WITHOUT AN |
| | APPROVED SEPARATION FROM THE ADDITION SHALL BE |
| | PROTECTED BY AN |
| | APPROVED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM WHERE THE COMBINED |
| | AREAS |
| | WOULD BE REQUIRED TO BE SPRINKLERED BY THE PROVISIONS |
| | APPLICABLE |
| | TO NEW CONSTRUCTION FOR THE OCCUPANCY. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS, CORRECT OR JUSTIFY WITH |
| | SPECIFIC CODE REFERENCES AND NARRATIVE. |
| | |
| | ANY WORK ON THE FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS |
| | SHALL BE DONE UNDER SEPARATE PERMITS AND SHOP DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE AN APPLICABLE NOTE OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
