| Plan Review Notes For Permit 20070426 |
| Permit Number |
20070426 |
|
| Review Stop |
B |
| Sequence Number |
1 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2020-07-15 16:16:59 | PLAN | | | REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | | | 1ST REVIEW: FBC SIXTH EDITION (2017) | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO | | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | | (561) 805-6714 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: | | | | | | 1) THE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FROM THE ENGINEER DO NOT | | | SPECIFY THE SYSTEM TYPE OR THE PAGE NUMBER FROM THE NOA | | | TO INDICATE WHICH TESTED ASSEMBLY HE BASED HIS | | | CALCULATIONS ON. I DID NOT FIND ONE WITH FASTENER | | | SPACINGS OF 4"O.C. AT THE LAP AND THREE ROWS 8"O.C. IN | | | THE FILED. FBC 107.2.1 | | | | | | 2) RAS 117 SECTION 8.1 STATES THAT THE MINIMUM FASTENER | | | SEPARATION SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 4"O.C.. THEREFORE, | | | THE 3" O.C. IN THE ENGINEER'S CALCULATIONS CAN NOT BE | | | USED. ADDITIONAL ROWS OF FASTENERS WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | SUBMIT CORRECTED CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 3) CIRCLE OR HI-LIGHT THE SYSTEM, FASTENING OPTION AND | | | DESIGN PRESSURE FOR THE PROPOSED ROOF COVERING ASSEMBLY | | | ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. FBC 107 |
|
