| Date |
Text |
| 2020-10-02 14:22:45 | SIGNATURE REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | 1- STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS: |
| | A)THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS THAT WERE DROPPED OFF IN CITY |
| | HALL DON'T HAVE THE SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD. (NOTE: DRAWINGS UPLOADED TO PROJECTOX WERE NOT |
| | SIGNED/SEALED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD EITHER). |
| | DRAWINGS NEED TO HAVE THE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND DATE |
| | OF THE ENGINEER WHO SIGNED THE PLANS AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 61G15-23.001 FAC AND CHAPTER 471 F.S. WHEN |
| | SUBMITTING PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC RECORDS. |
| | PLANS NEED TO BE RE-UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX WITH THE |
| | ENGINEER'S SEAL/SIGNATURE. |
| | |
| | NOTE: IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS, IT IS |
| | PREFERABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS TO |
| | PROJECTDOX WITH THE ENGINEER'S DIGITAL SIGNATURE. |
| | OTHERWISE, HARD COPY PLANS WITH ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL |
| | SEAL/SIGNATURE THAT MATCH PLANS UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX |
| | ARE REQUIRED TO BE DROPPED OFF IN CITY HALL. |
| | |
| | |
| | B)THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS THAT WERE DROPPED OFF IN CITY |
| | HALL DON'T MATCH ONES UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX. PLANS |
| | UPLOADED TO PROJECTDOX WERE REVISED 2 OR 3 TIMES |
| | ALREADY. NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM 1A ABOVE. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2- ARCHITECTURAL PLANS THAT WERE DROPPED OFF IN CITY |
| | HALL DON'T MATCH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS UPLOADED TO |
| | PROJECTDOX. DRAWINGS IN PROJECTDOX DON'T HAVE DRAWING |
| | A101, A501. ALSO, DRAWINGS DROPPED IN CITY HALL ARE |
| | MISSING DRAWING A105. |
| | PLEASE COORDINATE HARDCOPY PLANS WITH PLANS UPLOADED TO |
| | PROJECTDOX TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
