| Date |
Text |
| 2020-08-04 09:57:22 | NOTE: |
| | THIS REVIEW IS ONLY FOR THE SIGNATURE REVIEW. |
| | CONTRACTOR NEEDS TO UPLOAD TO PROJECTDOX THE |
| | INFORMATION REQUESTED BY THE PLANS EXAMINER FOR |
| | BUILDING, ELECTRICAL AND GAS. |
| | |
| | SIGNATURE REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | 1-ENGINEER WHO SIGNED AND SEALED THE CONCRETE PAD |
| | ENGINEERING IS NOT THE SAME ENGINEER WHO SIGNED/SEALED |
| | THE ORIGINAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTED. SEC. 107.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | THERE ARE THERE TWO OPTIONS TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE: |
| | (1)SUBMIT ENGINEERING WITH ORIGINAL SEAL/SIGNATURE OF |
| | THE ENGINEER WHO SIGNED THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL. OR |
| | (2) UPLOAD TO PROJECTDOX NEW DOCUMENT SIGNED/SEALED BY |
| | THE NEW ENGINEER FOR BUILDING REVIEW. |
| | NOTE: IN ORDER TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS, IT IS |
| | PREFERABLE TO DOWNLOAD THE NEW ENGINEERING WITH A |
| | DIGITAL SIGNATURE. OTHERWISE, HARD COPY WITH ORIGINAL |
| | SEAL/SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED. WE CAN USE THE ONE |
| | SUBMITTED NOW IF IT MATCHES THE ONE THAT WAS DOWNLOADED |
| | TO PROJECTDOX. |
| | |
| | 2- THE CONCRETE PAD ENGINEERING SUBMITTED DOESN'T MATCH |
| | THE ORIGINAL ENGINEERING THAT WAS UPLOADED TO |
| | PROJECTDOX. SEC. 107.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
