| Date |
Text |
| 2020-06-24 15:21:31 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | SHEDS |
| | |
| | 1- MASTER ANCHORING PLAN SUBMITTED IS NOT PART OF THE |
| | APPROVED PLANS FOR THIS MANUFACTURED SHED. ANY |
| | ADDITIONAL DRAWING THAT IS NOT PART OF THE APPROVED SET |
| | OF PLANS NEEDS TO HAVE THE ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE |
| | OF THE LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBLE FOR THE |
| | DRAWING. THIS DRAWING HAVE A COPY OF A DIGITAL |
| | SIGNATURE DATED 2019.08.01. PERMIT APPLICATION AND |
| | PLANS ARE NOT ELECTRONICALLY SUBMITTED. PLANS NEED TO |
| | HAVE THE ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G15-23.003 FAC AND CHAPTER |
| | 471 F.S. WHEN SUBMITTING PLANS/DOCUMENTS FOR PUBLIC |
| | RECORDS. |
| | ON THE OTHER HAND, ENGINEER MAY USE THE DIGITAL |
| | SIGNATURE WHEN FOLLOWING SEC. 61G15-23.004 FAC. |
| | |
| | ENGINEERS |
| | 61G15-23.004 PROCEDURES FOR DIGITALLY SIGNING AND |
| | SEALING ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED PLANS, |
| | SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2-PLANS FOR SHED SUBMITTED DON'T MATCH PLAN APPROVAL |
| | SPECIFIED ON THE LETTER WITH INTERTEK PSI LETTERHEAD |
| | THAT WAS SUBMITTED. PLANS SUBMITTED ARE FOR SHED MODEL |
| | SBS-S--180C, WHILE INTERTEK PSI LETTER IS FOR PLAN |
| | APPROVAL SBS-DWE-180. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING |
| | THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
