| Date |
Text |
| 2020-05-11 09:50:11 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) IS THIS PERMIT FOR A FOUNDATION OR A STAIR? |
| | |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY/SEPARATE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) THIS THIS PERMIT FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF A STAIR OR A |
| | NEW STAIR? |
| | |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY/SEPARATE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) THERE IS NO OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION THAT THIS NEW |
| | STAIR SERVES. |
| | |
| | WHAT DOES THIS STAIR SERVE? |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE OCCUPANCY CODE PER THE FLORIDA FIRE |
| | PREVENTION CODE, NFPA 101, CH 6. |
| | |
| | 6.1.1.1 OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. THE OCCUPANCY OF A |
| | BUILDING OR |
| | STRUCTURE, OR PORTION OF A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE, SHALL |
| | BE CLASSIFIED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH 6.1.2 THROUGH 6.1.13. OCCUPANCY |
| | CLASSIFICATION SHALL BE |
| | SUBJECT TO THE RULING OF THE AUTHORITY HAVING |
| | JURISDICTION WHERE THERE IS A |
| | QUESTION OF PROPER CLASSIFICATION IN ANY INDIVIDUAL |
| | CASE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) THERE ARE NO INDICATIONS OF ANY WINDOWS ON THE FACE |
| | OF BUILDING THAT THIS STAIR SERVES. |
| | |
| | IF THIS IS A REQUIRED EXIT OF THE OCCUPANCY IT SERVES, |
| | IT SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 101, CH 7, MEANS OF EGRESS |
| | |
| | 7.2.2.6.3 SEPARATION AND PROTECTION OF OUTSIDE STAIRS. |
| | 7.2.2.6.3.1* OUTSIDE STAIRS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE |
| | INTERIOR OF THE |
| | BUILDING BY CONSTRUCTION WITH THE FIRE RESISTANCE |
| | RATING REQUIRED FOR |
| | ENCLOSED STAIRS WITH FIXED OR SELF-CLOSING OPENING |
| | PROTECTIVES, |
| | EXCEPT AS FOLLOWS: |
| | (1) OUTSIDE STAIRS SERVING AN EXTERIOR EXIT ACCESS |
| | BALCONY THAT HAS |
| | TWO REMOTE OUTSIDE STAIRWAYS OR RAMPS SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED TO BE |
| | UNPROTECTED. |
| | (2) OUTSIDE STAIRS SERVING TWO OR FEWER ADJACENT |
| | STORIES, INCLUDING |
| | THE STORY WHERE THE EXIT DISCHARGES, SHALL BE PERMITTED |
| | TO BE |
| | UNPROTECTED WHERE THERE IS A REMOTELY LOCATED SECOND |
| | EXIT. |
| | (3) IN EXISTING BUILDINGS, EXISTING OUTSIDE STAIRS |
| | SERVING THREE OR |
| | FEWER ADJACENT STORIES, INCLUDING THE STORY WHERE THE |
| | EXIT |
| | DISCHARGES, SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE UNPROTECTED WHERE |
| | THERE IS |
| | A REMOTELY LOCATED SECOND EXIT. |
| | (4) THE FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF A SEPARATION |
| | EXTENDING 10 FT (3050 |
| | MM) FROM THE STAIRS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO EXCEED 1 |
| | HOUR |
| | WHERE OPENINGS HAVE A MINIMUM ?-HOUR FIRE PROTECTION |
| | RATING. |
| | (5) OUTSIDE STAIRS IN EXISTING BUILDINGS PROTECTED |
| | THROUGHOUT BY AN |
| | APPROVED, SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.7 SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE |
| | UNPROTECTED. |
| | 7.2.2.6.3.2 WALL CONSTRUCTION REQUIRED BY 7.2.2.6.3.1 |
| | SHALL EXTEND AS |
| | FOLLOWS: |
| | (1) VERTICALLY FROM THE FINISHED GROUND LEVEL TO A |
| | POINT 10 FT (3050 |
| | MM) ABOVE THE TOPMOST LANDING OF THE STAIRS OR TO THE |
| | ROOFLINE, |
| | WHICHEVER IS LOWER |
| | (2) HORIZONTALLY FOR NOT LESS THAN 10 FT (3050 MM) |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE DETAILS |
| | |
| | |
| | 5) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 6) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
