| Date |
Text |
| 2020-06-29 14:28:35 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET 3.1 - THEE IS AN INDICATION OF A FIRE |
| | SPRINKLER SYSTEM; HOWEVER, THERE ARE NO REQUIRED F.A.C. |
| | 61G DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | AN ENGINEER OF RECORD IS REQUIRED TO SUBMITT F.A.C. 61G |
| | DOCUMENTS FOR WATER BASED FIRE PROTECTION |
| | |
| | PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004, |
| | FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE |
| | POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF |
| | APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT, |
| | CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR |
| | AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER |
| | SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA) |
| | AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS |
| | PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS. |
| | |
| | 61G15-30.003 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGINEERING |
| | DOCUMENTS. |
| | (1) ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS ARE PREPARED IN THE COURSE OF |
| | PERFORMING ENGINEERING SERVICES. WHEN PREPARED FOR |
| | INCLUSION WITH AN APPLICATION FOR A GENERAL BUILDING |
| | PERMIT, THE DOCUMENTS SHALL MEET ALL ENGINEER?S |
| | RESPONSIBILITY RULES, SET FORTH IN CHAPTERS 61G15-31, |
| | 61G15-32, 61G15-33, AND 61G15-34, F.A.C., AND BE OF |
| | SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND |
| | EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT |
| | WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE, ADOPTED IN SECTION 553.73, F.S., AND APPLICABLE |
| | LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED |
| | BY THE AHJ. THE DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE: |
| | (A) INFORMATION THAT PROVIDES MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS |
| | REQUIRED FOR THE SAFE OPERATION OF THE SYSTEM THAT IS A |
| | RESULT OF ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS, KNOWLEDGE AND |
| | EXPERIENCE. |
| | (B) LIST FEDERAL, STATE, MUNICIPAL, AND COUNTY |
| | STANDARDS, CODES, ORDINANCES, LAWS, AND RULES, WITH |
| | THEIR EFFECTIVE DATES, THAT THE ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS |
| | ARE INTENDED TO CONFORM TO. |
| | (C) INFORMATION, AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD, NEEDED FOR THE SAFE AND EFFICIENT OPERATION OF |
| | THE SYSTEM. |
| | (D) LIST ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA; REFERENCE PROJECT |
| | SPECIFIC STUDIES, REPORTS, AND DELEGATED ENGINEERING |
| | DOCUMENTS. |
| | (E) IDENTIFY CLEARLY ELEMENTS OF THE DESIGN THAT VARY |
| | FROM THE GOVERNING STANDARDS AND DEPICT/IDENTIFY THE |
| | ALTERNATE METHOD USED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | STATED PURPOSE OF THESE RESPONSIBILITY RULES. |
| | (2) ENGINEERS SHALL LEGIBLY INDICATE THEIR NAME AND |
| | BUSINESS ADDRESS, ON ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS. ENGINEERING |
| | DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY OR |
| | CONCEPTUAL USE, SHALL CLEARLY NOTE THE INTENDED PURPOSE |
| | OF SUCH DOCUMENTS. |
| | (3) WHEN ELEMENTS OF THE PROJECT ARE SHOWN ON AN |
| | ENGINEERING DOCUMENT ONLY FOR INFORMATION OR |
| | CLARIFICATION AND THE ENGINEER DOES NOT INTEND TO |
| | ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ELEMENTS, THE ENGINEER |
| | SHALL CLEARLY NOTE ON THE DOCUMENTS THE EXTENT OF HIS |
| | RESPONSIBILITY. |
| | (4) ENGINEERING DRAWINGS SHALL BE LEGIBLE AND CLEARLY |
| | DEFINE AND DELINEATE THE WORK IN THE PROJECT. THEY MUST |
| | ALSO COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 61G15-23, F.A.C., SEALS. |
| | (5) ENGINEERS SHALL CLEARLY NOTE ON ANY PRELIMINARY |
| | ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS THAT SUCH DOCUMENTS ARE NOT IN |
| | FINAL FORM, BUT ARE BEING TRANSMITTED TO THE PUBLIC |
| | AGENCY TO RECEIVE AGENCY REVIEWS, COMMENTS AND |
| | INTERPRETATIONS. THE DOCUMENTS MAY SUBSEQUENTLY BE |
| | REVISED BY THE ENGINEER TO REFLECT RESOLUTION OF ISSUES |
| | WITH THE PUBLIC AGENCY PRIOR TO FINAL ACTION BY THE |
| | AGENCY. CHANGES, REVISIONS AND MODIFICATIONS TO A |
| | PROJECT MAY PROMPT ADDITIONAL DOCUMENT SUBMITTAL FOR |
| | AGENCY APPROVAL ACTION ON THE SAME PROJECT. |
| | |
| | SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL THEN BE SUBMITTED UNDER A |
| | SEPARATE PERMIT FOR INSTALLATION PURPOSES. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET E 1 & E 2 - THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS |
| | REQUIRED TO BE MONITORED. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101 CH 9 |
| | |
| | 9.6 FIRE DETECTION, ALARM, AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS. |
| | 9.6.1* GENERAL. |
| | 9.6.1.1 THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 9.6 SHALL APPLY ONLY |
| | WHERE |
| | SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED BY ANOTHER SECTION OF THIS CODE |
| | OR WHERE |
| | SUPERVISION OF A NEW FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM OR NEW FIRE |
| | ALARM |
| | SYSTEM IS REQUIRED BY THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. |
| | |
| | ALL FIRE ALARM WORK SHALL BE DONE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT |
| | AND SHOP DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE AN APPLICABLE NOTE OF |
| | ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) SHEET 3.1 - THERE IS AN INDICATION OF 3 FUEL TANKS |
| | BU OTHERS. |
| | |
| | THE INSTALLATION OF THESE TANKS IS NOT APPROVIDE UNDER |
| | THIS PERMIT AND ANY WORK INVLOVING THESE TANKS SHALL BE |
| | DONE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT AND SHOP DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE AN APPLICABLE NOTE OF |
| | ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 5) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |