| Date |
Text |
| 2022-01-03 14:20:48 | FAILED |
| | |
| | 1) THE SUBMITTED COMMUNICATION FACILITY PLACEMENT |
| | PERMIT - CITY RIGHTS-OF-WAY MUST BE APPROVED PRIOR TO |
| | THIS PERMIT BEING APPROVED. SOME OF THE COMMENTS BELOW |
| | ARE INCLUDED ON THE PLACEMENT PERMIT REVIEW AS WELL AS |
| | WITH THIS PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 2) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE SURVEY. THE SURVEY SHOWS |
| | A PORTION OF THE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC FROM THE POWER |
| | POLE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY TO THE NEW HANDHOLE IN THE |
| | 44TH STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY CROSSING A PORTION OF PRIVATE |
| | PROPERTY. IN ORDER FOR THE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TO |
| | CROSS PRIVATE PROPERTY, IT MUST BE LOCATED WITHIN A |
| | GENERAL UTILITY EASEMENT. THE SURVEY DOES NOT SHOW AN |
| | EASEMENT AT THIS LOCATION. IF THERE IS AN EASEMENT, IT |
| | MUST BE SHOWN ON THE SURVEY AND THE UNDERGROUND |
| | ELECTRIC MUST CLEARLY BE SHOWN IN THE EASEMENT. IF NO |
| | EASEMENT IS PRESENT, THE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC MUST COME |
| | FROM AN ALTERNATIVE LOCATION. |
| | |
| | 3) THE SURVEY SHOWS THE UNDERGROUND POWER LOCATED AT A |
| | DIFFERENT LOCATION THAN THE ENGINEERING PLAN. BOTH |
| | PLANS SHOW THE PORTION OF THE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC |
| | ROUTE FROM THE WESTERN HANDHOLE TO BROADWAY WITHIN THE |
| | CITY'S RIGHT-OF-WAY, BUT SINCE THEY ARE NOT THE SAME, |
| | THEY SHOW PROXIMITY TO DIFFERENT EXISTING CITY |
| | INFRASTRUCTURE. THE IMPACT TO THE INFRASTRUCTURE, IF |
| | ANY, CAN ONLY BE IDENTIFIED WITH ACCURATE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 4) PROVIDE CROSS SECTIONS OF THE LOCATION OF THE |
| | UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC (VERSION USED IN COMMENT #3 |
| | ABOVE), INCLUDING THE EXISTING UNDERGROUND |
| | INFRASTRUCTURE, FOR 44TH STREET WHICH VERIFIES THAT |
| | THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS. |
| | |
| | 5) SHEET E5, UTILITY ROUTING / GROUNDING PLAN SHOWS A |
| | WIRELESS FACILITY DESIGN THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH CITY |
| | STANDARDS. NOTE: A COMPLIANT POLE IS SHOWN ON SHEETS |
| | E2, E3 AND C3. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
