| Date |
Text |
| 2020-07-14 11:26:24 | FAILED |
| | |
| | PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSE TO COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 1) THE PERMIT NOW SHOWS THE SIGN MOUNTED TO A "TRELLIS |
| | BY OTHERS". NO PERMIT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR THE NEW |
| | TRELLIS. THE TRELLIS MUST FIRST BE APPROVED AS |
| | COMPLYING WITH THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA |
| | CANOPY REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS SIGN TO BE MOUNTED ON IT |
| | AS A CANOPY SIGN. ZONING WILL NOT APPROVE THIS PERMIT |
| | UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE CANOPY PERMIT IS APPROVED. |
| | |
| | 2) STAFF IS PROVIDING THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS BASED ON |
| | THE SIGN BEING A CANOPY SIGN: |
| | |
| | A. THE SIGN INCLUDES REVERSE CHANNEL LETTERS ABOVE THE |
| | CANOPY WITH THE POWER SUPPLY BOX ON TOP OF THE CANOPY |
| | BEHIND THE LETTERS. THIS IS NOT A PERMITTED OPTION FOR |
| | A CANOPY SIGN. THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA |
| | SPECIFIES LETTERS MAY BE MOUNTED IN THE VERTICAL FACE |
| | OF THE CANOPY, INDIVIDUAL METAL LETTERS MAY BE PIN |
| | MOUNTED ABOVE OR BELOW THE CANOPY (WITH AMBIENT |
| | ILLUMINATION PERMITTED), OR INTEGRATED INTO THE |
| | HORIZONTAL PLANE OF THE CANOPY AS PART OF THE CANOPY. |
| | NOTE: REGARDLESS OF THE FINAL SIGN DESIGN, THE CANOPY |
| | NEEDS TO BE DESIGNED TO INCORPORATE THE POWER SUPPLY, |
| | CONDUIT, ETC. WITHIN IT FOR ANY SIGNAGE THAT WILL BE |
| | MOUNTED ON THE CANOPY. |
| | |
| | B. THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA PERMIT A |
| | MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT OF 18 INCHES FOR A CANOPY SIGN |
| | UNLESS CITYPLACE RETAIL IS GRANTED A WAIVER II (MINOR |
| | PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT). THE WAIVER II MAY |
| | INCREASE THE SIGNS DIMENSION BY UP TO 25 PERCENT, SO |
| | THE LETTER HEIGHT COULD BE UP TO 22.5 INCHES, NOT 23 |
| | INCHES AS SHOWN. |
| | |
| | C. THE ROSEMARY SQUARE TENANT SIGN CRITERIA REQUIRE |
| | THAT THE WALL SIGNS (WHICH INCLUDE CANOPY SIGNS) BE |
| | BALANCED WITHIN THE SIGN SPACE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE |
| | DIMENSIONS FROM THE SIGN TO EACH END OF THE CANOPY. |
| | |
| | PERMITTED: 53 SF |
| | PROPOSED: 15.51 SF |
| | |
| | 3) ZONING STAFF HAS NOTED THAT THE WIND LOAD |
| | CALCULATION WAS BASED ON 1.5 FOOT TALL LETTERS, NOT THE |
| | ACTUAL HEIGHT OF THE END LETTERS. YOUR ENGINEER SHOULD |
| | REVIEW THIS TO VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO PROBLEMS GIVEN |
| | THE TALLER LETTERS. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
