| Date |
Text |
| 2020-05-01 15:43:12 | 1. THERE ARE TWO GN-00 - FIRST ONE HAS INCORRECT |
| | PARKING DATA TABLE ON SHEET GN-00 DOES NOT MATCH LATEST |
| | FROM APPROVED SITE PLAN, APPEARS TO BE OLDER PARKING |
| | TABLE - PLEASE UPDATE |
| | 2. FAR CALCULATIONS ON THIS SHEET GNB-00 DES NOT MATCH |
| | LATEST APPROVED SITE PLAN AND DOES NOT MATCH SHEET |
| | PZ-01- PLEASE CLARIFY - UPDATE 6/2/20 NOT APPLICABLE |
| | 3. FAR CALCULATIONS: THE UNENCLOSED AND ENCLOSED |
| | CORRIDOR LEADING FROM THE POOL DECK INTO THE BUILDING |
| | ON BOTH THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDE COUNT TOWARDS FAR (NOT |
| | NOTICED DURING SITE PLAN REVIEW) - THIS WILL NEED TO BE |
| | INCLUDED IN FAR CALCS - UPDATED 6/3/2020 NOT APPLICABLE |
| | 4. THE PARKING DATA ON THE SECOND SHEET GN-00 DOESN?T |
| | MATCH THE LATEST SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND SEEMS TO HAVE |
| | INCORRECT NUMBERS OF SPACES BASED ON THE FLOOR PLANS |
| | SUBMITTED. FOR EXAMPLE, THE NUMBER OF HC SPACES ON THE |
| | FIRST FLOOR IS LISTED AS 3 12X18 AND 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE - |
| | BUT THERE ARE ONLY 2 2X18. THE NUMBER OF COMPACT SPACES |
| | ON LEVEL 2 IS LISTED AS 8 BUT STAFF COUNTS 9. THE TOTAL |
| | SPACES ON LEVEL 1 RAMP LISTS 24 BUT STAFF COUNTS 20. |
| | 5. PER CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REQUIREMENT AND SITE |
| | PLAN CONDITION OF APPROVAL, THE THREE PARKING SPACES |
| | MARKED ?FUTURE CAR SHARE? AND ONE PARKING SPACE MARKED |
| | ?RESIDENTIAL PARKING GUEST? THAT ARE LOCATED BY THE |
| | OVERHANG GATE SHALL BE REMOVED OR THE OVERHANG GATE |
| | SHALL BE RELOCATED TO ELIMINATE CONFLICTS. IF THE |
| | SPACES ARE REMOVED, THREE OTHER GUEST SPACES MUST ALSO |
| | BE RESERVED FOR ?FUTURE CAR SHARE? AND ONE ADDITIONAL |
| | PARKING SPACE MUST BE RESERVED FOR ?GUEST PARKING? |
| | 6. PLEASE SUBMIT LEVEL OF SERVICE LETTER FOR TRASH |
| | COLLECTION TO PUBLIC WORKS AND TO ZONING FOR |
| | DETERMINATION OF CAPACITY FOR TRASH BINS/COMPACTORS. |
| | 7. ALL PARKING SPACES ADJACENT TO A WALL OR FIXED |
| | STRUCTURE NEED AN ADDITIONAL ONE FOOT OF SPACE ? |
| | PARKING SPACE ADJACENT TO MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM ON FIRST |
| | FLOOR DOES NOT HAVE ADDITIONAL ONE FOOT ? PLEASE CHECK |
| | ALL FLOOR PLANS FOR THIS REQUIREMENT AND ADJUST AS |
| | NECESSARY |
| | 8. ADDITIONALLY, THE TOTAL SPACES LISTED IN THIS |
| | PARKING DATA PER LEVEL DOES NOT MATCH THE LABEL ON THE |
| | FLOOR PLANS THAT SAY "X PARKING SPACES INCLUDING RAMP |
| | TO LEVEL X" - PLEASE CHECK |
| | 9. SOME DIMENSIONS MISSING FROM PLAN BREAK PLANS FLOOR |
| | PLAN- LEVEL 04 (SHEET PZ-02) |
| | 10. PLEASE UPDATE SHEET PZ-03 WITH DATA FROM LANDSCAPE |
| | PLANS ? (SEMI-PUBLIC COURTYARD NOT GARDEN PLAZA) FOR |
| | CONSISTENCY |
| | 11. PLEASE UPDATE ACTIVE USE PLAN SHEET PZ-04 AND |
| | TRANSPARENCY PLAN SHEET PZ-05 AND HORIZONTAL PROJECTION |
| | SHEET PZ-06 WITH UPDATED NORTH FA?ADE (UPDATED LOUVRE |
| | DOORS). PLEASE NOTE- GLASS DOOR TO FPL ROOM DOES NOT |
| | COUNT TOWARDS TRANSPARENCY PER DEFINITION OF |
| | TRANSPARENCY |
| | 12. THE MAIL ROOM ALONG OLIVE AVENUE, IF A SOLID WALL |
| | RATHER THAN WINDOWS FACES THE ROW, THIS CANNOT BE |
| | COUNTED TOWARDS ACTIVE USE OR TRANSPARENCY. IT APPEARS |
| | IT WAS NOT COUNTED IN DATA, BUT IT IS HIGHLIGHTED AS |
| | ACTIVE USE AND TRANSPARENCY ON THE FLOOR PLANS ON SHEET |
| | PZ-04 AND PZ-05. UPDATE PLANS AS NECESSARY. PLEASE |
| | CONSIDER THE USE OF WINDOWS ALONG THE MAIL ROOM. |
| | 13. LANDSCAPE: THE RELOCATING PALMS WILL NOT |
| | EFFECTIVELY SCREEN THE PARKING GARAGE LIKE THE |
| | EVER-GREEN TREES THAT WERE PROPOSED IN SITE PLAN |
| | APPROVAL. THE PALMS CAN BE RELOCATED OFF SITE - TALK TO |
| | RAY CARANCI FOR OPTIONS. THE PALMS DO NOT PROVIDE |
| | SUFFICIENT BUFFERING |
| | 14. PLEASE REMOVE ANY CLOUD BUBBLING FROM PLANS IF OLD, |
| | PLEASE INCLUDE CLOUD BUBBLING FOR ANY NEW UPDATES |
| | 15. THE PORTION OF HORIZONTAL PROJECTION ON TANGLEWOOD |
| | COURT FOR THE NE CORNER ELEVATION ON SHEET PZ-06 NEED |
| | TO BE SHIFTED TO CONTAIN THE CORRECT AREA |
| | 16. PLEASE REMOVE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHEET PZ-07 FROM |
| | PLAN SET ? TO BE REVIEWED THROUGH SEPARATE PERMIT |
| | (REMINDER THAT SEMI PUBLIC COURTYARD AND ALL BUILDING |
| | ENTRANCES NEED TO BE INCLUDED IN PHOTOMETRIC PLAN) |
| | PLEASE LOOK AT THE EASTERN MOST LIGHT POLE PROPOSED ON |
| | TANGLEWOOD COURT AND ITS PROXIMITY TO THE FIRE HYDRANT |
| | ? CHECK WITH BUILDING/FIRE DEPT FOR PERMITTED LOCATION |
| | AND PROXIMITY) ? SUBMIT LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH LIGHT POLES |
| | SHOWN WITH PHOTOMETRIC PERMIT |
| | 17. PLEASE RELOCATE PUBLIC USE BIKE RACKS TO CONCRETE |
| | AREA NOT WITHIN MAIN PATH OF TRAVEL TO AVOID HAVING |
| | CONCRETE PAD IN MIDDLE OF PAVER AREA |
| | 18. BENCH WITHIN SETBACK AREA CANNOT BE MORE THAN 42? |
| | TALL ? PLEASE INCLUDE DETAIL OF BENCH AND HEIGHT |
| | 19. ALL BENCHES SHALL HAVE CENTER BAR TO DETER |
| | LOITERING ? PLEASE INCLUDE DETAIL |
| | 20. HOW WILL PAVER AREA TRANSITION INTO ADA RAMP AT |
| | PROJECT?S SOUTHEAST CORNER? WILL LARGE CONCRETE BAND BE |
| | REQUIRED? PLEASE CONSIDER |
| | 21. PLEASE CHECK WITH MARK HURLEY ON DISTANCE BETWEEN |
| | BACKFLOW PREVENTER AND PROPOSED TREE ? DETERMINE IF |
| | TREE NEEDS TO BE SHIFTED TO ACCOMMODATE |
| | 22. PLEASE REMOVE LABEL REFERENCING RELOCATED LIVE OAK |
| | TREE FROM ENLARGED 1ST FLOOR PLAN SHEET A1-01A |
| | 23. THERE IS PARKING SPACE ALONG THE NORTH FA?ADE WITH |
| | A LABEL ON FLOOR PLAN LEVEL 2 SHEET A1-02 THAT |
| | REFERENCES A TURNAROUND AND BACKUP SPACE, BUT THE SPACE |
| | ALSO IS LABELED AS A COMPACT SPACE |
| | 24. ENLARGED PLANS A AND B DO NOT MATCH THE OVERALL |
| | FLOOR PLAN FOR EACH LEVEL 2-8 INCLUDING SUCH ITEMS AS |
| | DOUBLE STRIPING FOR PARKING, BALCONIES, PARKING |
| | CONFIGURATION ETC. PLEASE UPDATE ALL AS NECESSARY |
| | 25. THE RENDERING OF THE SOUTHEAST VIEW SHOWS A GLASS |
| | WINDOW WHERE THE LOUVRED DOOR WAS ORIGINALLY PROPOSED |
| | ALONG TANGLEWOOD CT, BUT THE ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PAN |
| | DO NOT INDICATE A WINDOW. PLEASE UPDATE ELEVATIONS AND |
| | FLOOR PLAN TO REFLECT IF THERE IS A WINDOW IN THIS |
| | LOCATION, WHICH IS PREFERRED BY STAFF. |
| | 26. THE WIDTH OF THE EASTERN MOST ROW OF BALCONIES |
| | (CLOSEST TO OLIVE AVENUE) ALONG THE NORTH FA?ADE |
| | APPEARS WIDER ON THE ELEVATION AND FLOOR PLAN THAN ON |
| | THE RENDERING ? PLEASE ADJUST AS NECESSARY. |
| | 27. IT APPEARS THAT THE NORTH PORTION OF THE BIKE |
| | STORAGE MAY ONLY HAVE A 6-FOOT HEIGHT CLEARANCE ? |
| | CONFIRM WITH BUILDING DEPARTMENT IF THIS WILL BE AN |
| | ISSUE FOR BICYCLE STORAGE AND ADJUST IF NECESSARY |
| | 28. ADDITIONAL DEPTH WAS ADDED TO THE WEST ELEVATION OF |
| | THE SOUTH GARAGE ENTRANCE THROUGH CMU WALL ? IS THIS |
| | ACCURATELY REFLECTED IN RENDERINGS AND ELEVATIONS? |
| | 29. IS THE STAIRCASE LEADING FROM THE POOL DECK NOT |
| | COVERED? DO NOT SEE INDICATION OF COVERING ON 4TH FLOOR |
| | ELEVATION OR ON RENDERINGS ? PLEASE CLARIFY |
| | 30. PLEASE INCLUDE DETAIL FOR SF-11 AND SF-17 FOR |
| | DOORWAYS. ARE THESE DOORWAYS ALSO GLASS? THEY DO THEY |
| | APPEAR NOT GLASS ON COLOR ELEVATIONS |
| | 31. WILL THERE BE A GATE AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE |
| | PEDESTRIAN PASEO? WHAT CAN BE DONE TO BLOCK VIEW OF THE |
| | PARKING GARAGE AND RAMP FROM THE SIDEWALK? |
| | 32. ON THE EAST ELEVATION, THERE APPEARS A BOX ON THE |
| | SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO A LIGHT POLE ALONG THE NORTH |
| | (ALONG TANGLEWOOD CT) ? WHAT IS THIS? |
| | 33. CROSS SLOPES EXCEED MAX. PERMITTED WITHIN ROW - |
| | DISCUSSIONS ONGOING WITH CITY ENG AND KIMLEY HORN. |
| | PLEASE UPDATE WHEREVER NECESSARY ONCE FINAL IS APPROVED |
| | THROUGH ENG |
| | 34. PLEASE UPDATE GARAGE SCREEN ENLARGED ELEVATION |
| | SHEET A4-10 WITH AICP CONCEPT PAGES OR FINAL SELECTION |
| | ? AN AMENDMENT FOR THE GARAGE SCREENING WILL NEED TO BE |
| | SUBMITTED IF THE FINAL SELECTION IS MADE AFTER THE |
| | BUILDING PERMIT IS APPROVED |
| | 35. STAFF NOTICED THAT SHEET A5-10, A5-11, A5-13 DO NOT |
| | MATCH PARAPET HEIGHT AND MISSING CANOPY ALONG NORTH |
| | SIDE. SHEET A5-21 OLD PARKING ENTRANCE DESIGN. PLEASE |
| | ENSURE ALL WALL SECTIONS AND ENLARGED ELEVATION SHEETS |
| | ARE UPDATED TO MATCH MOST CURRENT ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN |
| | 36. SHEET A5-12: IN THE CASE THAT THE ART IS NOT |
| | APPROVED BY AIPP OR ANOTHER AREA ON THE BUILDING/GROUND |
| | IS PICKED FOR THE AIPP, THE PERFORATED METAL SQUARE |
| | LATTICE WITHIN THE PROPOSED ART BOX SHALL HAVE TO BE |
| | RECONSIDERED. THE ART WALL FRAME ITSELF MAY NEED TO BE |
| | RECONSIDERED. |
| | 37. SHEET A5-20 REFERENCES THE NEED FOR LIGHTS TO BE AT |
| | THE PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCES ? THESE NEED TO BE |
| | SHIELDED FROM PUBLIC ROW TO THE BEST EXTENT POSSIBLE |
| | 38. SHEET A6-01 HAS OLD BICYCLE STORAGE ROOM DETAIL ? |
| | PLEASE REMOVE |
| | 39. SHEET A6-01 LABELS ?ENLARGED PLAN- MAINTENANCE |
| | ROOM? BUT THE IMAGE IS OF COMPACT PARKING SPACES. |
| | PLEASE UPDATE AS NECESSARY. PET SPA DETAIL ON SHEET |
| | A6-01 DOES NOT MATCH FLOOR PLAN |
| | 40. SHEET A6-02 DOES NOT MATCH UPDATED FLOOR PLAN. |
| | PLEASE ENSURE SHEET A6-03 IS UPDATED IF NECESSARY |
| | 41. PARTIAL FOUNDATION PLAN S100A AND S100B DO NOT |
| | MATCH FLOOR PLAN ? SUGGEST REMOVING ROM PERMIT SET |
| | UNLESS BUILDING DEPT NEEDS THESE SHEETS. IF THEY NEED |
| | THEM, PLEASE UPDATE. RECOMMEND SAME FOR PARTIAL FRAMING |
| | PLANS IF THEY DON?T MATCH FOR PLAN CONSISTENCY |
| | 42. PLEASE REMOVE PHOTOMETRIC PLANS FOR FIRST LEVEL AND |
| | GARAGE AND SUBMIT SEPARATE PERMIT |
| | 43. PLEASE INCLUDE UPDATED CONTEXTUAL ELEVATIONS WITH |
| | UPDATED DISTANCE BETWEEN PROPOSED STRUCTURE AND TWO |
| | CITY PLAZA AS REQUIRED BY SITE PLAN CONDITION OF |
| | APPROVAL |
| | 44. PLEASE CONSIDER AN ADDITIONAL DOOR LEADING TO |
| | RETAIL/RESTAURANT SPACE ALONG NORTH FA?ADE |
| | |
| | PROPOSED PROVISOS: |
| | 1. ALL ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED IF NOT DONE |
| | SO THROUGH RAISED PARAPET. |
| | 2. ALL LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION TO BE TO BE REVIEWED |
| | THROUGH SEPARATE PERMIT |
| | 3. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY |
| | INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED TO SERVE THE |
| | PROJECT. |
| | 4. ALL STREET LIGHTS, TREE GRATES, BOLLARDS, PAVERS OR |
| | ANY OTHER STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS INSTALLED WITHIN THE |
| | CITY?S ROW SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY?S STANDARDS AND SHALL |
| | BE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIVISION AND THE |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT DURING THE BUILDING |
| | PERMIT PROCESS. ANY FEES ASSOCIATED WITH THE REMOVAL OF |
| | EXISTING STREET LIGHTS SHALL BE A COST TO THE OWNER. |
| | 5. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT, |
| | THE APPLICANT SHALL PREPARE A CONSTRUCTION SITE |
| | SECURITY AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY |
| | OF WEST PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT CPTED OFFICIAL. |
| | 6. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE |
| | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND |
| | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. |
| | 7. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON |
| | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. |
| | 8. IRRIGATION FOR STREET TREES AND LANDSCAPING IN THE |
| | RIGHT OF WAYS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT, |
| | SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS FROM THE SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT. |
| | ALL EXISTING CITY IRRIGATION LINES RUNNING TO |
| | INDIVIDUAL AREAS OR TREES SHALL BE REMOVED AND CAPPED |
| | IN SUCH A WAY TO ENSURE CITY IRRIGATION SUPPLY LINES |
| | SHALL REMAIN INTACT AND CONTINUOUS FOR OTHER AREAS |
| | SERVED BY THE LINES |
| | 9. THE OWNER SHALL WORK WITH CITY STAFF TO KEEP |
| | TANGLEWOOD COURT, TRINITY PLACE AND OLIVE AVENUE OPEN |
| | FOR VEHICLES AND PEDESTRIANS BY MEANS OF SCAFFOLDING OR |
| | OTHER MEASURES TO THE MOST EXTENT POSSIBLE THROUGHOUT |
| | THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. |
| | 10. THE OWNER SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE CITY PARKING |
| | ADMINISTRATION FOR THE REMOVAL AND RELOCATION OF |
| | ON-STREET PARKING SPACES. |
| | 11. THE PROJECT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENT FOR ART IN |
| | PUBLIC PLACES. |
| | 12. THE OWNER SHALL CONTRIBUTE A TROLLEY FEE AT $10 PER |
| | MICRO-UNIT PER MONTH. THIS PAYMENT METHOD SHALL BE |
| | ESTABLISHED PRIOR TO CO. |
| | 13. RECORDED SIDEWALK/ACCESS EASEMENTS SHALL BE |
| | REQUIRED, AND ALL OTHER EASEMENTS DEEMED NECESSARY BY |
| | THE CITY SURVEYOR. |
| | 14. PAVEMENT SHALL BE RESURFACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | CITY STANDARDS TO ANY AREA WHERE PAVEMENT MARKINGS ARE |
| | REMOVED. |
| | 15. THE OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CAPTURING ANY |
| | MAJOR GRADE CHANGES WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING |
| | AND KEEP THE PUBLIC AREAS OF THE LOT FREE OF |
| | TRIP-HAZARD CURB LINES OR ANY RAMPS. |
| | 16. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE |
| | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF |
| | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE |
| | DEVELOPMENT. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE |
| | MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. |
| | |
| | LIZ LEVESQUE, URBAN DESIGN PLANNER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561 822 1426 |
| | |
