| Date |
Text |
| 2020-03-05 15:51:54 | SIGN SECOND BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- ENGINEERED DRAWINGS ARE INCOMPLETE. FRONT ELEVATION |
| | W/ CAISSON FOUNDATION DETAIL 1 ON DRAWING #1 STATES |
| | THAT "SIGN CABINETS, BASE AND CONNECTIONS TO POLE BY |
| | SIGNS UNLIMITED-NC" SIGN ENGINEER OF RECORD NEEDS TO |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND |
| | PROPOSED INSTALLATION OF THE SIGN CABINET AND BASE. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. 1609.1 FBC-BUILDING. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. SAME PLANS SUBMITTED. |
| | NOTE; THIS COMMENT APPLIES TO SIGN SHOWN ON DRAWING #5 |
| | ALSO. ENGINEER NEEDS TO SPECIFY THE FASTENING OF THE |
| | WALL SIGN NOT SIGNS UNLIMITED. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- PLANS NEED TO SPECIFY THE LOCATION OF EACH OF THE |
| | SIGNS SHOWN ON THE ENGINEERED DRAWINGS 1 THRU 6. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. 1609.1 FBC-BUILDING. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. SAME PLANS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| | LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| | CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND ALL DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. PROVIDE COPY OF SIGNED CONTRACTS INCLUDING |
| | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE. |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 4- NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED. SEC. 713.13 |
| | F.S. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ARCHITECTS-ENGINEERS |
| | FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS |
| | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN |
| | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS |
| | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO |
| | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY |
| | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, |
| | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, |
| | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, |
| | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER |
| | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL |
| | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH |
| | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, |
| | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE |
| | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
