| Date |
Text |
| 2020-02-19 18:00:01 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| | MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER |
| | THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES APPLY. CONTRACTOR TO |
| | ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME OR |
| | IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: SEC. 702.6 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW WORK |
| | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MATERIALS AND METHODS |
| | REQUIREMENTS IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. |
| | |
| | NOTE: SEC. 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND SPACES |
| | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE. |
| | |
| | 1- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | A)OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B)PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, |
| | INCLUDING OWNER'S NAME, BUILDER'S NAME, |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C) PROVIDE CORRECT INFORMATION ON ITEM #1 ON PAGE 1 OF |
| | 4. THIS IS NOT NEW CONSTRUCTION. THIS IS AN EXISTING |
| | HOUSE. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | D) REVISE COOLING INFORMATION ON ITEM #12 ON PAGE 1 OF |
| | 4 TO MATCH PLANS AND COOLING EQUIPMENT INFORMATION |
| | SUBMITTED. THE SEER OF THIS EQUIPMENT IS 14.50 NOT 16. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THE SEER OF THE EQUIPMENT WAS |
| | CHANGED. PAGE 1 OF 4 SHOWS 14.5 SEER BUT THE FINAL |
| | RESULTS DIDN'T CHANGE. THE TOTAL PROPOSED MODIFIED |
| | LOADS (36.27) AND THE TOTAL BASELINE LOADS (40.62) |
| | STAYED THE SAME AS THE OLD ENERGY CALCULATIONS THAT |
| | WERE SUBMITTED EARLIER. THIS IS A COMPUTER GENERATED |
| | PROGRAM. ANY CHANGES WILL RESULT IN CHANGES ON THE |
| | FINAL OUTPUT. CLARIFY/REVISE AS REQUIRED. ORIGINAL |
| | COMPUTER GENERATED ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE |
| | REVISED. (NOTE: OWNER TOOK ONE COPY OF THE OLD ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS AND THE NEW ENERGY CALCULATIONS THAT WERE |
| | RESUBMITTED TO TAKE BACK TO THE PERSON WHO DID THE |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS). |
| | IN ADDITION, AFTER TALKING TO THE MR. BARIS (OWNER) WE |
| | FOUND OUT THAT THE EQUIPMENT SIZE SHOWN ON THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS (1-1/2 TON.) DOESN'T MATCH THE EQUIPMENT |
| | SIZE SHOWN ON THE A/C PLAN (3.5 TON). REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | E) DOORS INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 4 IS INCORRECT. THERE |
| | ARE NOT 3 EXTERIOR DOORS. SEE PROPOSED PLAN AND REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | F) WINDOWS INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 4 IS INCORRECT. THE |
| | WINDOWS FRAME IS PVC NOT METAL. SEE WINDOW SCHEDULE ON |
| | ENGINEERED DRAWING 2.0 AND PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED |
| | AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. ALSO, REVISE WINDOW AREAS TO |
| | MATCH PLANS. NOTE: COORDINATE WITH DOOR INFORMATION |
| | COMMENT #1(E) ABOVE. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- SPECIFY THE SIZE AND TYPE OF EXISTING WINDOW AND |
| | SIZE AND TYPE OF PROPOSED WINDOWS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 702.5 FBC-EXISTING |
| | BUILDING. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THIS IS OK. SEE CURRENT PERMIT #19100358 FOR WINDOW |
| | REPLACEMENT. INSPECTIONS FOR WINDOWS ARE CURRENTLY DONE |
| | UNDER THIS PERMIT. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| | REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS |
| | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION |
| | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO |
| | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY |
| | QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
