| Date |
Text |
| 2020-04-09 16:42:08 | 3RD REVIEW FBC-2017 MECHANICAL |
| | PERMIT #19120391 |
| | 4/9/20 |
| | |
| | CODES IN EFFECT: |
| | |
| | FBC B- FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SIXTH EDITION 2017 |
| | FBC M- FLORIDA MECHANICAL CODE SIXTH EDITION 2017 |
| | FBC EC- FLORIDA ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE SIXTH EDITION |
| | 2017 |
| | FBC FG- FLORIDA FUEL GAS CODE SIXTH EDITION 2017 |
| | FBC EX- FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE SIXTH EDITION |
| | 2017 |
| | FS- FLORIDA STATUTES |
| | FAC- FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | WPB- WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC SIXTH |
| | EDITION 2017 |
| | |
| | PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED. |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET M0.2 & M0.3: THE AC CALCULATIONS ARE |
| | INDICATING THE SPACES REQUIRE 389.0 MBH COOLING, 40 KW |
| | HEATING, AND 8207 CFMS OF COOLING AIRFLOW. THE AHU AND |
| | VAV SCHEDULES INDICATE THE COOLING, HEATING, AND |
| | AIRFLOW CAPACITIES ARE DEFICIENT- 315.0 MBH, 27.3 KW, |
| | AND 7800 CFMS. PLEASE PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION FOR THE |
| | DEFICIENCIES- SECTION 312.1 FBC M, AND SECTION C403.2.1 |
| | FBC EC. |
| | |
| | 2) M0.2: I HAVE REVIEWED THE LETTER CONCERNING THE |
| | PROPOSED REDUCTION IN OUTDOOR VENTILATION AIR BASED ON |
| | USING THE CALCULATED EGRESS LOAD OF THE AUDITORIUM |
| | VERSUS THE CALULATED LOAD AS REQUIRED PER TABLE |
| | 403.3.1.1 FBC M, AND IN THE PROCESS NOTICED A |
| | DEFICIENCY IN THE LOBBY WHICH IS BEING CALCULATED AS AN |
| | OFFICE LOBBY RATHER THAN AN AUDITORIUM OR THEATRE LOBBY |
| | PER TABLE 403.3.1.1. PLEASE CORRECT THE CALCULATIONS |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | CONCERNING THE LETTER, WHAT EVIDENCE IS BEING PROVIDED |
| | TO SUPPORT THE STATEMENT THAT THE REDUCTION OF |
| | VENTILATION AIR REQUIRED FOR 526 OCCUPANTS DOWN TO THE |
| | REQUIREMENT FOR 256 OCCUPANTS "WOULD SATISFY THE INTENT |
| | OF THE CODE FOR THE HEALTH AND COMFORT OF EACH OCCUPANT |
| | WHILE BEING MINDFUL OF ENERGY CONSERVATION". |
| | CONSIDERING THAT THE THE VENTILATION TABLES IN THE FBC |
| | M ARE BASED ON THE TABLES IN ASHRAE 62.1, AND YOUR |
| | ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE USING A METHOD FROM ASHRAE |
| | 90.1, WOULD THERE BE ANY ALTERNATE VENTILATION METHOD |
| | IN THOSE STANDARDS, OR SOME OTHER ACCEPTABLE STANDARDS |
| | THAT WOULD SUPPORT THIS STATEMENT? THE 1ST REVIEW |
| | COMMENT #8 PRINTED BELOW WILL STILL APPLY AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | 3) M1: PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE THERMOSTATS FOR |
| | THE LOBBY, THE STAGE AREA AND TB-1 & 5- SECTION |
| | C403.2.4.1 FBC EC. |
| | |
| | 4) M1: SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE CO2 SENSORS- SECTION |
| | 107.2.1 WPB. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SENSORS SHALL BE |
| | INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECS. THE SPECS CAN BE |
| | SUBMITTED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE OR DEFERRED. |
| | |
| | 5) M1 & A2: PLEASE INDICATE THE HEIGHT OF THE TB ACCESS |
| | PANELS FROM THE FINISH FLOOR- SEE SECTION 306.5 FBC M. |
| | |
| | COMMENTS #8 & 9 FROM THE 1ST REVIEW WILL REMAIN AT THIS |
| | TIME PENDING MORE INFORMATION. PLEASE NOTE THE |
| | ENGINEERING FOR THE CHILLER MAY BE A DEFFERED |
| | SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 8) M2: THE VENTILATION CALCULATIONS FOR AUDITORIUM ARE |
| | INCORRECT. TABLE 403.3.1.1 FBC M REQUIRES 150 PERSONS |
| | PER 1000 SF. |
| | |
| | 9) PROVIDE ENGINEERING FOR INSTALLATION OF THE CHILLER- |
| | SECTION 301.15 FBC M. |
| | |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. |
| | |
| | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE |
| | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET |
| | WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 |
| | 561-805-6719 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
