| Date |
Text |
| 2020-03-06 14:38:21 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION/ADDITION THIRD BUILDING |
| | REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | NOTE: SEC. 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND SPACES |
| | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- PLANS SUBMITTED ARE NOT CLEAR. THEY DON'T SPECIFY |
| | WHAT IS THE SCOPE OF WORK AND WHERE. ALSO, PLANS |
| | SUBMITTED DON'T MATCH WHAT IS ON THE CITY RECORDS AND |
| | THE PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER WEBSITE. FOR |
| | EXAMPLE, PLANS SUBMITTED SHOW TWO BATHROOMS. CITY |
| | RECORDS AND PROPERTY APPRAISER ONLY SHOW ONE BATHROOM. |
| | ALSO, THE FOOTPRINT OF PLANS SUBMITTED IS BIGGER THAN |
| | THE FOOTPRINT SHOWN ON CITY RECORDS AND PROPERTY |
| | APPRAISER. |
| | ACCORDING TO CITY RECORDS, THERE ARE MANY EXPIRED |
| | PERMITS APPLICATIONS ON THIS PROPERTY. SUCH PERMIT |
| | APPLICATIONS WERE FOR REPLACEMENT OF DOORS AND WINDOWS |
| | AND FOR ADDITION OF THE LIVABLE AREA. ALSO, THERE ARE |
| | SOME PHOTOS ON THE WEBSITE WHEN THIS HOUSE WAS FOR SALE |
| | SHOWING SOME FAIRLY NEW EXTERIOR DOORS AND WINDOWS. |
| | THERE ARE NO CITY RECORDS FOR REPLACEMENT OF DOORS AND |
| | WINDOWS (THERE IS A RED TAG WITH 4X FEE FOR WINDOW WORK |
| | WITHOUT PERMIT). |
| | IF THE INTENTION IS TO CORRECT ALL WORK THAT MAY HAVE |
| | BEEN DONE WITHOUT PERMITS, THEN PROVIDE COMPLETE SETS |
| | OF PLANS DRAWN TO SCALE, SHOWING ALL THE DIMENSIONS OF |
| | ALL ROOMS AND SHOWING ALL THE SCOPE OF WORK THAT IS |
| | PENDING. SUCH PLANS NEED TO HAVE THE NAME AND SIGNATURE |
| | OF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PLANS SUBMITTED FROM YVES LUBIN, PE: |
| | |
| | A) CLARIFY WHERE IS THE ONE HOUR FIRE RATED WALL |
| | PARTITION SHOWN ON SHEET A GOING TO BE INSTALLED. IT IS |
| | NOT CLEAR WHY BUILDING A ONE HOUR FIRE RATED WALL IN A |
| | SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B) SCOPE OF WORK SHOWN ON PLANS IS FOR INTERIOR |
| | REMODELING ONLY. BASED ON THE DRAWINGS SUBMITTED IT |
| | LOOKS LIKE WORK WAS DONE WITHOUT THE PERMITS BEING |
| | APPROVED. |
| | PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE SUBMITTED BUT THEY WERE NOT |
| | APPROVED BECAUSE REQUIRED INFORMATION WAS NOT SUBMITTED |
| | FOR APPROVAL. |
| | THE FOLLOWING ARE THE EXPIRED PERMIT APPLICATIONS: |
| | |
| | EXPIRED PERMIT APPLICATION #05110324 WAS FOR THE |
| | ADDITION OF THE ROOM AT THE BACK OF THE HOUSE. PERMIT |
| | WAS NEVER ISSUED. |
| | |
| | EXPIRED PERMIT APPLICATION #05120800 WAS FOR THE |
| | ADDITION OF THE FRONT ENTRANCE. PERMIT WAS NEVER |
| | ISSUED. |
| | |
| | EXPIRED PERMIT APPLICATION #08090049 WAS FOR THE |
| | REPLACEMENT OF WINDOWS/DOORS AND TO BRING THE REAR |
| | ADDITION UP TO CODE. PERMIT WAS NEVER ISSUED EITHER. |
| | |
| | NEED TO EITHER INCLUDE THE WORK OF THE EXPIRED PERMITS |
| | IN THIS PERMIT APPLICATION (PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | INFORMATION: STRUCTURAL PLANS/DETAILS FOR THE TWO |
| | ADDITIONS, PRODUCT APPROVALS AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS) |
| | OR PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION UNDER SEPARATE PERMITS. |
| | CONTRACTOR TO ADVICE HOW ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- FOR WINDOW REPLACEMENT NEED TO SPECIFY THE TYPE AND |
| | SIZE OF WINDOW TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE BEDROOM |
| | EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 702.5 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | COORDINATE WITH ITEM #1 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR ALL EXTERIOR DOORS, WINDOWS, WINDOW |
| | MULLIONS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | COORDINATE WITH ITEM #1 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 4- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| | LOW BASED ON ALL THE SCOPE OF WORK. VALUATION TO |
| | INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND |
| | PROFIT AND DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. UPDATE VALUATION OR PROVIDE COPY |
| | OF SIGNED CONTRACTS INCLUDING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 5-IMPACT FEES - |
| | PLANS REQUIRE REVIEW BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE. CALL |
| | (561) 233-5025. UPON APPROVAL OF PLANS, YOU MAY CHECK |
| | OUT ONE PLAN SET AND TAKE TO THAT OFFICE FOR REVIEW. |
| | PLEASE RETURNED STAMPED AND WITH A COPY OF THE RECEIPT |
| | AS APPLICABLE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE |
| | QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE. THE |
| | FORM CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/AD |
| | MINISTRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ONCE PLANS ARE APPROVED. NEED TO BRING ONE SET OF PLANS |
| | TO PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT. BRING |
| | BACK STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT IF FEES ARE |
| | DUE. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| | REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS |
| | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION |
| | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO |
| | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE SUBMITTAL AND |
| | REMOVE/VOID THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. PLEASE |
| | DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS . SUBMIT OLD |
| | DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IN ORDER TO AVOID MULTIPLE SUBMITTALS, PLEASE FEEL FREE |
| | TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE |
| | COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
