| Date |
Text |
| 2019-10-17 15:20:42 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) BUILDING REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 1- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: |
| | A)MISSING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. PROVIDE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R101.5.1 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | B) AN ENVELOPE LEAKAGE TEST REPORT PERFORMANCE METHOD |
| | WAS SUBMITTED WITH THE CONTRACTOR CERTIFYING THAT THE |
| | ENVELOPE LEAKAGE PERFORMANCE RESULTS DEMONSTRATE |
| | COMPLIANCE. CONTRACTOR TO CLAREIFY HOW CAN THE |
| | CONTRACTOR CERTIFY THAT THE ENVELOPE LEAKAGE |
| | PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS IN COMPLIANCE IF THE HOSE IS NOT |
| | BUILT YET? |
| | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2- SURVEY SUBMITTED: |
| | A) SURVEY SUBMITTED IS NOT DRAWN TO SCALE. SURVEY |
| | SPECIFIES 1"-10' SCALE. NEED A LARGER SHEET SIZE AS |
| | NOTED ON SURVEY REPORT NOTE #13 OR PROVIDE SURVEY WITH |
| | TRUE SCALE. SEC. |
| | 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B) SURVEY SUBMITTED HAS A PRINTED COPY OF A DIGITAL |
| | SIGNATURE. DIGITAL SIGNATURES ARE FOR ELECTRONICALLY |
| | SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS. THIS IS NOT AN ELECTRONIC |
| | SUBMITTAL. SURVEY NEEDS ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 472.025 FLORIDA STATUES. |
| | |
| | 3- ATTIC ACCESS SIZE SPECIFIED ON PLANS (22"X54")DON'T |
| | SEEM TO FIT ON THE HALLWAY THE WAY IS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | IF THIS IS THE SIZE THAT IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED, THEN |
| | THE OPENING NEEDS TO BE ORIENTED PERPENDICULAR TO THE |
| | ROOF TRUSSES AND STRUCTURAL FRAMING DETAILS WILL NEED |
| | TO BE PROVIDED. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R301.1 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 4- REVISE DOOR/WINDOW BUCK NOTES ON SHEET A-1. BEVELED |
| | BUCKS AR NOT ALLOWED. THE BUCK NEEDS TO EXTEND BEYOND |
| | THE INTERIOR FACE OF THE WINDOW OR DOOR FRAME AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R609.7.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE |
| | NOTES AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 5- ROOF SHEATHING NAILING TYPE AND SIZE SPECIFIED ON |
| | THE TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET S-3 DOESN'T MATCH THE |
| | SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON THE ROOF SHEATHING DIAPHRAGM |
| | SCHEDULE ON SHEET S-2. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. |
| | SEC. R301.2.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: |
| | (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION PRIOR TO |
| | INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. ALL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS NEED TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL): |
| | |
| | A)ENTRY DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | B) ROOF SHINGLES. PROVIDE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | COVER PAGE THAT CORRESPONDS TO DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. NEED |
| | COVER PAGE TO VERIFY CURRENT CODE AND IF THE PRODUCT IS |
| | APPROVED. |
| | |
| | C) PRECAST LINTELS AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | 7-DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS |
| | |
| | 8- TRUSS PACKAGE |
| | NOTE: |
| | TRUSS PACKAGE IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PLAN |
| | REVIEW FOR ONE AND TWO FAMILY BUILDINGS. CONTRACTOR MAY |
| | DELIVER THE TRUSS PACKAGE TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR AT |
| | THE TIME OF FRAMING INSPECTIONS AFTER CORRECTIONS |
| | ADDRESSING THE COMMENTS ARE ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | A) ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | TRUSS DRAWING AND TRUSS LAYOUT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B)TRUSS PACKAGE SUBMITTED NEEDS A TITLE BLOCK WITH THE |
| | INFORMATION OF THE TRUSS ENGINEER ON EACH SHEET AND |
| | EACH SHEET NEEDS TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE TRUSS |
| | ENGINEER AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G15-23.001 FAC. |
| | |
| | C) TRUSS LAYOUT TO SHOW THE TRUSS TO TRUSS CONNECTORS |
| | AND LOCATION. TRUSS ENGINEER TO SIGN AND SEAL THESE |
| | PLANS AND PROVIDE HIS INFORMATION AS REQUIRED BY FAC |
| | 61G15-23.001. OR PROVIDE COMPLETE STRUCTURAL |
| | CONNECTIONS ON EACH INDIVIDUAL TRUSS DRAWING. |
| | |
| | 9- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| | LOW BASED ON ALL THE SCOPE OF WORK. VALUATION TO |
| | INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND |
| | PROFIT AND DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. VALUATION WAS UPDATED TO |
| | $201,054. THE PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS $4503.23. |
| | |
| | 10-IMPACT FEES - |
| | PLANS REQUIRE REVIEW BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE. CALL |
| | (561) 233-5025. UPON APPROVAL OF PLANS, YOU MAY CHECK |
| | OUT ONE PLAN SET AND TAKE TO THAT OFFICE FOR REVIEW. |
| | PLEASE RETURNED STAMPED AND WITH A COPY OF THE RECEIPT |
| | AS APPLICABLE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE MUNICIPAL IMPACT FEE |
| | QUESTIONNAIRE FORM TO THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE. THE |
| | FORM CAN BE FOUND AT: HTTP://DISCOVER.PBCGOV.ORG/PZB/AD |
| | MINISTRATION/PDF/IMPACTFEES/FORMS/QUESTIONNAIRE.PDF |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| | REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS |
| | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION |
| | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO |
| | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE SUBMITTAL AND |
| | REMOVE/VOID THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. PLEASE |
| | DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS . SUBMIT OLD |
| | DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IN ORDER TO AVOID MULTIPLE SUBMITTALS, PLEASE FEEL FREE |
| | TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE |
| | COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
