| Date |
Text |
| 2019-09-17 15:43:44 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET S-2 OF THE APPROVED PLANS THERE ARE NOTES THAT |
| | INDICATE THE CHILLER SUPPORT WILL BE UNDER A SEPARATE |
| | PERMIT. THEREFORE, THESE DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | SUBMITTED AS A SEPARATE PERMIT. THIS SUBMITTAL NUMBER |
| | CAN BE CHANGED TO A PERMIT NUMBER. YOU WILL NEED TO |
| | HAVE THE CONTRACTOR THAT IS INSTALLING THE CHILLER |
| | STAND FILL OUT A PERMIT APPLICATION AND SUBMIT IT WITH |
| | THE OTHER DOCUMENTS. FBC 105.1 |
| | |
| | 2) THE ENGINEERED DOCUMENTS THAT WERE SUBMITTED ARE |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED BY AN ARCHITECT. AN ARCHITECT IS ONLY |
| | ALLOWED TO SIGN AND SEAL ENGINEERING THAT IS INCIDENTAL |
| | TO THEIR ARCHITECTURAL PRACTICE. |
| | ARCHITECTS |
| | SEC. 481.229 (4)?NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF THIS |
| | PART OR OF ANY OTHER LAW, NO REGISTERED ENGINEER WHOSE |
| | PRINCIPAL PRACTICE IS CIVIL OR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, |
| | OR EMPLOYEE OR SUBORDINATE UNDER THE RESPONSIBLE |
| | SUPERVISION OR CONTROL OF THE ENGINEER, IS PRECLUDED |
| | FROM PERFORMING ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES WHICH ARE PURELY |
| | INCIDENTAL TO HIS OR HER ENGINEERING PRACTICE, NOR IS |
| | ANY REGISTERED ARCHITECT, OR EMPLOYEE OR SUBORDINATE |
| | UNDER THE RESPONSIBLE SUPERVISION OR CONTROL OF SUCH |
| | ARCHITECT, PRECLUDED FROM PERFORMING ENGINEERING |
| | SERVICES WHICH ARE PURELY INCIDENTAL TO HIS OR HER |
| | ARCHITECTURAL PRACTICE. HOWEVER, NO ENGINEER SHALL |
| | PRACTICE ARCHITECTURE OR USE THE DESIGNATION |
| | ?ARCHITECT? OR ANY TERM DERIVED THEREFROM, AND NO |
| | ARCHITECT SHALL PRACTICE ENGINEERING OR USE THE |
| | DESIGNATION ?ENGINEER? OR ANY TERM DERIVED THEREFROM. |
| | |
| | 3) THE PROJECT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PERMIT WAS |
| | PERMITTED UNDER THE 2014 FBC FIFTH EDITION. THEREFORE, |
| | TO RETAIN CONSISTENCY THE DOCUMENTS FOR THIS PERMIT |
| | SHOULD USE THE SAME DESIGN CRITERIA. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 4) THE NOTES ON SHEET S-2 OF THE APPROVED PLANS SPECIFY |
| | THAT THE CHILLER WILL BE MOUNTED ON A 4'-2" X 6'-3" |
| | WALL MOUNTED METAL PLATFORM 7'-6" AFF AND A WIND |
| | PRESSURE OF 96 PSF (ASD). THE ENGINEERING DRAWINGS ARE |
| | IN CONFLICT WITH THIS INFORMATION. THE APPROVED PLANS |
| | OR PROPOSED ENGINEERING WILL HAVE TO BE REVISED TO |
| | CORRECT THE DIFFERENCES AND REFLECT ACTUAL LOCATION OF |
| | THE PLAT FORM STAND. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 5) WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A |
| | RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE |
| | CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT |
| | CORRECTED PLAN SHEETS INTO THE SETS, REMOVE THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND MARK VOID ON THEM, AND |
| | KEEP THEM WITH THE SUBMITTALS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
