| Date |
Text |
| 2020-03-11 13:58:03 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION SECOND BUILDING |
| | REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 6TH EDITION (2017) AND CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| | MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER |
| | THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES MAY APPLY. CONTRACTOR |
| | TO ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME |
| | OR IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: SEC. 801.3 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING. ALL NEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND SPACES |
| | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. |
| | |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- ACCORDING TO SEC. R301.2.1.4 FBC-RESIDENTIAL THIS |
| | BUILDING IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE "D" NOT "C". REVISE THE |
| | DESIGN CRITERIA SHOWN ON SHEET A-3 AT THE BOTTOM LEFT |
| | OF THE PAGE. REVISE THE BUILDING EXPOSURE AND ALL THE |
| | DESIGN WIND PRESSURES ACCORDINGLY. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | THE BUILDING EXPOSURE WAS REVISED ON SHEET A-3 BUT THE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES WERE NOT REVISED. THE SAME DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WERE SPECIFIED. |
| | ARCHITECT STATES THAT DOORS & WINDOWS DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | ARE FOR WORST CASE. USING TABLE R301.2(2) |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL AS A REFERENCE, THE DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | FOR WALL OPENINGS ARE LOW. WORST CASE WOULD BE THE |
| | MINIMUM EFFECTIVE AREA OF 10PSF, AT THE MEAN ROOF |
| | HEIGHT OF 25 FEET, AT THE END ZONE (#5) AND BUILDING |
| | EXPOSURE "D". SEE TABLE R301.2(3) FBC-RESIDENTIAL FOR |
| | PROPER ADJUSTMENTS. |
| | REVISE DOORS AND WINDOWS DESIGN PRESSURES OR PROVIDE |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR EACH OPENING. SEC. 107.2.1.2 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- SPECIFY CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS BY THE BEDROOMS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R315.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | PARTIALLY COMPLIED. SMOKE ALARM WITH CARBON MONOXIDE |
| | COMBO ALARM WAS SPECIFIED FOR THE BEDROOM IN THE SECOND |
| | FLOOR ADDITION. NEED TO SPECIFY THE CARBON MONOXIDE |
| | ALARM FOR ALL EXISTING BEDROOMS ALSO. |
| | |
| | 3- OK |
| | 4- OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 5- ADDITION IS DESIGNED WITH UNVENTED ATTIC. ARCHITECT |
| | IS SPECIFYING R-30 ICYNENE SPRAY INSULATION. PROVIDE |
| | ICC EVALUATION REPORT (2 COPIES) FOR THE ICYNENE R-30 |
| | INSULATION TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R316 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: ARCHITECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THE REPORT IN |
| | WRITING PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | A) ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THE |
| | INSULATION WILL BE R-20 BUT SPECIFICATION ON SHEET A-4 |
| | WERE REVISED TO R-13. CLARIFY WHAT IS THE CORRECT R |
| | VALUE. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B) ICC EVALUATION REPORT SUBMITTED IS OLD. ESR-3199 |
| | REPORT SUBMITTED WAS SUPPOSED TO BE RENEWED ON 04/2017. |
| | SEE UPPER RIGHT CORNER OF REPORT SUBMITTED. PROVIDE |
| | COPIES OF CURRENT REPORT. |
| | NOTE: ARCHITECT, PLEASE STAMP THE FRONT PAGE OF THE |
| | REPORT NOT THE BACK OF THE PAGE. THIS WILL FACILITATE |
| | PROPER SCANNING FOR RECORDS RETENTION. THANKS IN |
| | ADVANCE FOR YOUR COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | 6- OK |
| | 7- OK |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 8- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO MATCH PLANS. (A)ACCORDING |
| | TO PLANS SUBMITTED THERE IS NOT KITCHEN IN THE |
| | ADDITION. (B) REVISE CEILING R-VALUE TO MATCH PLANS. |
| | PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE BUILDER. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE |
| | NOT REVISED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 9- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ROOF TILE FASTENING AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.2.1.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. IF |
| | SPECIFYING SCREWS, THEN SPECIFY SIZE AND NUMBER OF |
| | SCREWS. IF SPECIFYING ROOF TILE ADHESIVE, THEN SPECIFY |
| | PADDY SIZE AND PRODUCT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE |
| | LETTER STATES "SEE REVISED DRAWING S-2". THERE IS NOT |
| | INFORMATION ON SHEET S-2 REGARDING THE FASTENING OF THE |
| | ROOF TILE. PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE NOT SUBMITTED YET. |
| | THEY WILL BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. |
| | THERE IS NO INDICATION OF HOW THE ROOF TILES ARE GOING |
| | TO BE FASTENED. IN ORDER TO GO FORWARD WITH THIS ITEM, |
| | THIS WILL BE TAKEN CARE OF WHEN PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE |
| | SUBMITTED. |
| | NOTE: PRODUCT APPROVALS WILL NEED TO BE MARKED WITH THE |
| | SPECIFIC FASTENING METHOD AND REVIEWED/APPROVED BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 10-PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: |
| | (NOTE: THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED LATER AS A DEFERRED |
| | SUBMITTAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION PRIOR TO |
| | INSTALLATION TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS) |
| | |
| | A)ALL WINDOWS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | B) ALL EXTERIOR DOORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | C) WINDOW MULLIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. AND REQUIRED: |
| | CLEARLY SPECIFY MULLION SIZE TO BE USED TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | D)ROOF TILE AND CLEARLY MARK ROOF TILE FASTENING METHOD |
| | AS REQUIRED BY CITY POLICY FOR ALL ROOFING PERMITS. |
| | E)ROOF TILE ADHESIVE IF SPECIFIED BY THE DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD. |
| | |
| | 11- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| | REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS |
| | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL |
| | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE |
| | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION |
| | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO |
| | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED |
| | COOPERATION. |
| | |
| | PLEASE, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE SUBMITTAL AND |
| | REMOVE/VOID THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. PLEASE |
| | DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS . SUBMIT OLD |
| | DRAWINGS/DOCUMENTS FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | IN ORDER TO AVOID MULTIPLE SUBMITTALS, PLEASE FEEL FREE |
| | TO CONTACT ME IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE |
| | COMMENTS, |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
