| Date |
Text |
| 2020-05-29 13:30:46 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW: FBC SIXTH EDITION (2017) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) NOT COMPLIANT. THE OCCUPANT LOAD CALCULATIONS WERE |
| | CORRECTED ON SHEET A0.0 TO 38 OCCUPANTS. HOWEVER, THE |
| | LIFE SAFETY PLAN ON SHEET A2.0 WAS NOT CHANGED FROM 19 |
| | TO 38 OCCUPANTS. PLEASE CORRECT SHEET A2.0. THE |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD CALCULATIONS ARE INCORRECT. THE JUICE BAR |
| | AND THE YOGA AREA ARE BOTH ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES. |
| | THEREFORE, YOU WOULD USE THE ASSEMBLY OCCUPANT LOAD |
| | FROM TABLE 1004.1.2 AND DIVIDE THE NET FLOOR AREA OF |
| | EACH OF THESE TWO AREAS BY 15. BASED ON THE AREAS |
| | PROVIDED, THIS GIVES YOU AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 11 |
| | (DECIMALS ALWAYS ROUND UP) FOR THE JUICE BAR AND 26 FOR |
| | THE YOGA AREA. INCLUDING THE 1 OCCUPANT FROM THE |
| | MECHANICAL ROOM AND BATHROOM AREAS THE TOTAL NUMBER OF |
| | OCCUPANTS IS 38. BECAUSE THE OCCUPANT LOAD IS LESS THAN |
| | 50, THIS IS A TYPE B OCCUPANCY PER FBC 303.1.1. |
| | (ORIGINAL COMMENT FOLLOWS) SPECIFY OCCUPANCY TYPE AND |
| | OCCUPANT LOAD ON THE PLANS. FBC 302 & 1004 IT APPEARS |
| | THAT DUE TO SMALL SIZE BUILDING AND THE YOGA AREA THAT |
| | THERE WILL BE LESS THAN 50 PERSONS WHICH WOULD ALLOW |
| | THIS TO BE CLASSIFIED AS A BUSINESS OCCUPANCY. SEE |
| | SECTIONS 303.1.1, 303.1.2 AND 304.1. |
| | |
| | 2) WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A |
| | RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH REVIEW COMMENT ALONG |
| | WITH THE CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. THIS WILL ALSO HELP |
| | REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME. |
| | |
| | |
