| Date |
Text |
| 2019-08-06 14:44:46 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE A CLEAR SCOPE OF WORK. |
| | THERE IS A SHADED AREA IDENTIFIED AS NOT IN SCOPE, YET |
| | IT APPEARS THAT MEZZANINE STAIRS ARE BEING RELOCATED IN |
| | THAT SPACE. |
| | |
| | IS THIS PROPOSED PROJECT SEPARATING TWO SEPARATE |
| | SPACES? |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS INCLUDING ANY AND ALL WORK |
| | ASSOCIATED WITH THE ADJACENT SPACE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET A 1 & A 3- THERE IS A SEPARATION WALL |
| | INDICATED AS W 7 WHICH IS NOT INDICATED AS HAVING A |
| | RATED LISTING ON SHEET A 3. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REIVEW AND OR CORRECT |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) SHEET A 1 & A 3 - THE RATED WALL DETAILS AT THE |
| | OFFICE AREAS DO NOT INDICATE CONTIUNITY OF THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION FROM THE FLOOR UP TO FLOORING/DECKING, |
| | THROUGH THE FLOORING/DECKING AND ABOVE THE MEZZANINCE |
| | TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE ROOF. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS TO ENSURE CONTINOUS CONSTRUCTION |
| | FEATURES. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) SHEET LS 1 - THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE EXIT SIGNS |
| | ONCE ENTRANCE TO THE STORAGE AREA IS MADE FROM THE |
| | OFFICE AREA. HOWEVER, A FEW DO APPEAR ON SHEETS A 1 AND |
| | E 2. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CH 7, MEANS OF EGRESS |
| | |
| | 7.10 MARKING OF MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| | 7.10.1 GENERAL. |
| | 7.10.1.1 WHERE REQUIRED. MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL BE |
| | MARKED IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 7.10 WHERE REQUIRED IN CHAPTERS |
| | 11 |
| | THROUGH 43. |
| | 7.10.1.2 EXITS. |
| | 7.10.1.2.1* EXITS, OTHER THAN MAIN EXTERIOR EXIT DOORS |
| | THAT OBVIOUSLY |
| | AND CLEARLY ARE IDENTIFIABLE AS EXITS, SHALL BE MARKED |
| | BY AN APPROVED |
| | SIGN THAT IS READILY VISIBLE FROM ANY DIRECTION OF EXIT |
| | ACCESS. |
| | |
| | 7.10.1.5 EXIT ACCESS. |
| | 7.10.1.5.1 ACCESS TO EXITS SHALL BE MARKED BY APPROVED, |
| | READILY |
| | VISIBLE SIGNS IN ALL CASES WHERE THE EXIT OR WAY TO |
| | REACH THE EXIT IS |
| | NOT READILY APPARENT TO THE OCCUPANTS. |
| | 7.10.1.5.2* NEW SIGN PLACEMENT SHALL BE SUCH THAT NO |
| | POINT IN AN |
| | EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR IS IN EXCESS OF THE RATED VIEWING |
| | DISTANCE OR |
| | 100 FT (30 M), WHICHEVER IS LESS, FROM THE NEAREST |
| | SIGN. |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL EXIT SIGNAGE MAY BE REQUIRED IF RACKS OR |
| | EQUIPMENT IS PROPOSED IN THIS OPEN STORAGE SPACE. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW, CORRECT WHERE NEEDED TO BE CONSISTENT |
| | AND PROVIDE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 5) SHEET A 1 - THERE IS A NOTE INDICATING NEW GUARDRAIL |
| | WITH NO DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 7.2.2.4.6.1 THE HEIGHT OF GUARDS REQUIRED IN 7.1.8 |
| | SHALL BE |
| | MEASURED VERTICALLY TO THE TOP OF THE GUARD FROM THE |
| | SURFACE |
| | ADJACENT THERETO. |
| | 7.2.2.4.6.2 GUARDS SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 42 IN. (1065 |
| | MM) HIGH, |
| | EXCEPT AS PERMITTED BY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: |
| | (1) EXISTING GUARDS WITHIN DWELLING UNITS SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED TO |
| | BE NOT LESS THAN 36 IN. (915 MM) HIGH. |
| | (2) THE REQUIREMENT OF 7.2.2.4.6.2 SHALL NOT APPLY IN |
| | ASSEMBLY |
| | OCCUPANCIES WHERE OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN CHAPTERS 12 AND |
| | 13. |
| | (3) *EXISTING GUARDS ON EXISTING STAIRS SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED TO BE |
| | NOT LESS THAN 30 IN. (760 MM) HIGH. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS IN COMPLAINCE WITH NFPA 101. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 6) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 7) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
