| Date |
Text |
| 2019-07-23 11:55:49 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) THE LIFE SAFETY SHEETS INDICATES A GREATER THAN 200' |
| | TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM THE STAIRWELL ON THE WEST SIDE |
| | APARTMENT CORRIDORS. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 14 - |
| | |
| | 7.3.2.2* WHERE THE MOST REMOTE PORTION OF A |
| | NONSPRINKLERED |
| | FLOOR OR STORY IS LOCATED IN EXCESS OF 150 FT (45.7 M) |
| | OF TRAVEL |
| | DISTANCE FROM A HOSE CONNECTION IN OR ADJACENT TO A |
| | REQUIRED |
| | EXIT OR THE MOST REMOTE PORTION OF A SPRINKLERED FLOOR |
| | OR STORY |
| | IS LOCATED IN EXCESS OF 200 FT (61 M) OF TRAVEL |
| | DISTANCE FROM A |
| | HOSE CONNECTION IN OR ADJACENT TO A REQUIRED EXIT, |
| | ADDITIONAL |
| | HOSE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED, IN APPROVED |
| | LOCATIONS, |
| | WHERE REQUIRED BY THE LOCAL FIRE DEPARTMENT OR THE AHJ. |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL FD HOSE CONNECTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO REDUCE |
| | THIS DISTANCE FOR FIREGROUND OPERATIONS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE COORDINATE THOSE LOCATIONS WITH THE OFFICE OF |
| | THE FIRE MARSHAL. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) LIFE SAFETY SHEETS & STAIRWELL SHEETS - THERE ARE NO |
| | INDICATIONS OF EXIT TACTILE MARKINGS |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101 , CH 30 NEW APARTMENT OCCUPANCIES & CH 7, |
| | MEANS OF EGRESS |
| | |
| | 31.2.10 MARKING OF MEANS OF EGRESS. MEANS OF EGRESS |
| | SHALL HAVE |
| | SIGNS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 7.10 IN ALL BUILDINGS |
| | REQUIRING MORE |
| | THAN ONE EXIT. |
| | |
| | 7.10.1.3 EXIT DOOR TACTILE SIGNAGE. TACTILE SIGNAGE |
| | SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED TO MEET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, UNLESS |
| | OTHERWISE |
| | PROVIDED IN 7.10.1.4: |
| | (1) TACTILE SIGNAGE SHALL BE LOCATED AT EACH EXIT DOOR |
| | REQUIRING AN |
| | EXIT SIGN. |
| | (2) TACTILE SIGNAGE SHALL READ AS FOLLOWS: EXIT. |
| | (3) TACTILE SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH ICC/ANSI A117.1, |
| | AMERICAN |
| | NATIONAL STANDARD FOR ACCESSIBLE AND USABLE BUILDINGS |
| | AND |
| | FACILITIES. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE DETAILS |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) SHEET FS 2.3B - THERE ARE NO INDICATIONS OF FIRE |
| | SPRINKLER PROTECTION ON THE 3RD LEVEL OF THE PARKING |
| | GARAGE. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT OR JUSTIFYCLARIFICATION OR |
| | WITH SPECIFIC CODE REFERENCES. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) SHEET LS 1 - THE R-100 RETAIL/RESTAURANT SPACE |
| | INDICATES TWO EXITS THAT DO NOT APPEAR TO MEET THE |
| | SEPARATION REQUIREMENT. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CH 7 |
| | |
| | 7.5.1.3.3 IN BUILDINGS PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN |
| | APPROVED, |
| | SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH SECTION |
| | 9.7, THE MINIMUM SEPARATION DISTANCE BETWEEN TWO EXITS, |
| | EXIT |
| | ACCESSES, OR EXIT DISCHARGES, MEASURED IN ACCORDANCE |
| | WITH 7.5.1.3.2, |
| | SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN ONE-THIRD THE LENGTH OF THE |
| | MAXIMUM OVERALL |
| | DIAGONAL DIMENSION OF THE BUILDING OR AREA TO BE |
| | SERVED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS OR |
| | CORRECT. |
| | |
| | |
| | 5) SHEET LS 1 - THERE IS AN INDICATION OF A DOUBLE DOOR |
| | EXIT FROM THE EXTERIOR TERRACE A-122, TO THE CLUBROOM A |
| | 120 WHICH INDICATES FUNRNITURE IN THE TRAVEL PATH. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CH 7 |
| | |
| | 7.1.10 MEANS OF EGRESS RELIABILITY. |
| | 7.1.10.1* MAINTENANCE. MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL BE |
| | CONTINUOUSLY |
| | MAINTAINED FREE OF ALL OBSTRUCTIONS OR IMPEDIMENTS TO |
| | FULL INSTANT |
| | USE IN THE CASE OF FIRE OR OTHER EMERGENCY. |
| | 7.1.10.2 FURNISHINGS AND DECORATIONS IN MEANS OF |
| | EGRESS. |
| | 7.1.10.2.1 NO FURNISHINGS, DECORATIONS, OR OTHER |
| | OBJECTS SHALL |
| | OBSTRUCT EXITS OR THEIR ACCESS THERETO, EGRESS THERE |
| | FROM, OR |
| | VISIBILITY THEREOF. |
| | |
| | 7.5 ARRANGEMENT OF MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| | 7.5.1 GENERAL. |
| | 7.5.1.1 EXITS SHALL BE LOCATED, AND EXIT ACCESS SHALL |
| | BE ARRANGED, SO |
| | THAT EXITS ARE READILY ACCESSIBLE AT ALL TIMES. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 6) SHEET LS 1 - IN CORRIDOR 105 THERE ARE THREE EXITS |
| | CONVERGING TO ONE; (1) THE EXTERIOR TERRACE EXIT DOUBLE |
| | DOOR; (2) THE PARKING GARAGE EXIT DOUBLE DOOR AND (3) |
| | CORRIDOR 104 SINGLE EXIT DOOR. |
| | |
| | IT APPEARS THAT THE OCCUPANCY LOAD TOTALS FROM THOSE |
| | EXITS ARE INSUFFICIENT FOR THE SINGLE EXIT DISCHARGE |
| | DOOR AT THE END OF THE CORRIDOR 105. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CH 7 |
| | |
| | 7.3.3* EGRESS CAPACITY. |
| | 7.3.3.1 EGRESS CAPACITY FOR APPROVED COMPONENTS OF |
| | MEANS OF |
| | EGRESS SHALL BE BASED ON THE CAPACITY FACTORS SHOWN IN |
| | TABLE |
| | 7.3.3.1, UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN 7.3.3.2. |
| | 7.3.3.3 THE REQUIRED CAPACITY OF A CORRIDOR SHALL BE |
| | THE OCCUPANT |
| | LOAD THAT UTILIZES THE CORRIDOR FOR EXIT ACCESS DIVIDED |
| | BY THE |
| | REQUIRED NUMBER OF EXITS TO WHICH THE CORRIDOR |
| | CONNECTS, BUT THE |
| | CORRIDOR CAPACITY SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN THE REQUIRED |
| | CAPACITY OF THE |
| | EXIT TO WHICH THE CORRIDOR LEADS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC OCCUPANY LOAD TOTALS COMING |
| | IN FROM THOSE EXITS AND THAT THE EXIT DISCHARGE DOOR |
| | CAN HANDLE THIS OCCUPANCY LOAD TOTAL OR CORRECT. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 7) SHEET LS 1 - IN CORRIDOR 111 THERE ARE THREE EXITS |
| | CONVERGING TO ONE; (1) THE COURTYARD EXIT DOUBLE DOOR; |
| | (2) THE PARKING GARAGE EXIT DOOR AND (3) CORRIDOR 110 |
| | SINGLE EXIT DOOR. |
| | |
| | IT APPEARS THAT THE OCCUPANCY LOAD TOTALS FROM THOSE |
| | EXITS ARE INSUFFICIENT FOR THE SINGLE EXIT DISCHARGE |
| | DOOR AT THE END OF THE CORRIDOR 111. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CH 7 |
| | |
| | 7.3.3* EGRESS CAPACITY. |
| | 7.3.3.1 EGRESS CAPACITY FOR APPROVED COMPONENTS OF |
| | MEANS OF |
| | EGRESS SHALL BE BASED ON THE CAPACITY FACTORS SHOWN IN |
| | TABLE |
| | 7.3.3.1, UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN 7.3.3.2. |
| | 7.3.3.3 THE REQUIRED CAPACITY OF A CORRIDOR SHALL BE |
| | THE OCCUPANT |
| | LOAD THAT UTILIZES THE CORRIDOR FOR EXIT ACCESS DIVIDED |
| | BY THE |
| | REQUIRED NUMBER OF EXITS TO WHICH THE CORRIDOR |
| | CONNECTS, BUT THE |
| | CORRIDOR CAPACITY SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN THE REQUIRED |
| | CAPACITY OF THE |
| | EXIT TO WHICH THE CORRIDOR LEADS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC OCCUPANY LOAD TOTALS COMING |
| | IN FROM THOSE EXITS AND THAT THE EXIT DISCHARGE DOOR |
| | CAN HANDLE THIS OCCUPANCY LOAD TOTAL OR CORRECT. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 8) SHEET LS 1 - IN CORRIDOR 106.1 THERE ARE THREE EXITS |
| | CONVERGING TO ONE; (1) THE EXTERIOR TERRACE EXIT DOOR |
| | (2) THE PARKING GARAGE EXIT DOUBLE DOOR AND THE 2ND |
| | FLOOR STAIRWELL EXIT . |
| | |
| | IT APPEARS THAT THE OCCUPANCY LOAD TOTALS FROM THOSE |
| | EXITS ARE INSUFFICIENT FOR THE SINGLE EXIT DISCHARGE |
| | DOOR AT THE END OF THE STAIRWELL EXIT DOOR.. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CH 7 |
| | |
| | 7.3.3* EGRESS CAPACITY. |
| | 7.3.3.1 EGRESS CAPACITY FOR APPROVED COMPONENTS OF |
| | MEANS OF |
| | EGRESS SHALL BE BASED ON THE CAPACITY FACTORS SHOWN IN |
| | TABLE |
| | 7.3.3.1, UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN 7.3.3.2. |
| | 7.3.3.3 THE REQUIRED CAPACITY OF A CORRIDOR SHALL BE |
| | THE OCCUPANT |
| | LOAD THAT UTILIZES THE CORRIDOR FOR EXIT ACCESS DIVIDED |
| | BY THE |
| | REQUIRED NUMBER OF EXITS TO WHICH THE CORRIDOR |
| | CONNECTS, BUT THE |
| | CORRIDOR CAPACITY SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN THE REQUIRED |
| | CAPACITY OF THE |
| | EXIT TO WHICH THE CORRIDOR LEADS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC OCCUPANY LOAD TOTALS COMING |
| | IN FROM THOSE EXITS AND THAT THE EXIT DISCHARGE DOOR |
| | CAN HANDLE THIS OCCUPANCY LOAD TOTAL OR CORRECT. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 9) SHEET LS 5 - THE EAST APARTMENT ROOF DOES NOT APPEAR |
| | TO HAVE AN ACCESS/EXIT. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND CLARIFY ACCESS/EXIT FROM THAT ROOF |
| | SECTION. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 10) FIRE ALARM SHEETS - THE FACP COULD NOT BE LOCATED. |
| | THOUGH THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL DRAWINGS THE FACP LOCATION |
| | NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | AS THIS BUILDING IS DIVIDED, MULTIPLE FACP(SISTER |
| | PANELS) MAY BE REQUIRED TO EXPRDITE FD RESPONSE AND |
| | LOCATION. |
| | |
| | CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL |
| | IS ESSENTIAL. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE PROPOSED LOCATION(S) (ONE IN |
| | EACH ELECTRICAL ROOM?), THAT IS EASILIY IDENTIFIABLE |
| | FOR REVIEW PURPOSES. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 11) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 12) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |